feed

How Jimmy Dore Broke Out of the Propaganda Matrix

Published on

Written by Dr Joseph Mercola

He was duped by the matrix of propaganda, but after he took the vaccine he had horrible side effects and went on to discover they lied about everything as part of a criminal act on an unbelievable scale. Now he’s spitting fire at the evil psychopathic system

In this interview, one of my favorite comedians, Jimmy Dore, and I discuss the propaganda machine surrounding all things COVID. I’ve posted many of his videos on this site, as I enjoy his direct and incisive commentary. Like me, Dore grew up in Chicago, Illinois. He packed up his belongings and drove to Los Angeles, California, in 1995, and never looked back.

“Everything worked out in Los Angeles for me when I got to town,” he says. “It was a real refuge being around all the other comedians and actors and artists. I got lucky, I got an agent right away and I was able to get on television right away. So everything worked out.”

Exiting the Matrix

I’m impressed with Dore’s critical thinking skills because, like most people, he got caught up in the propaganda and believed the COVID jab would be a good strategy. He took the shot, suffered side effects from it, and had to find a holistic physician who was able to guide him back to health.

Unlike most people, however, Dore was able to put two and two together after that, and realized he’d been duped. The shot was nowhere near as safe (or effective) as they claimed. After that realization, he started seeing through other propaganda narratives as well.

“I was completely propagandized,” he says. “I have a bone condition that I have to treat every day, so I was afraid. They made it sound like if you got COVID, it’s going to go find the most vulnerable part of your body, it’s going to infect it and kill you. So, I was convinced that if I got it, it was going to go right to my bones and kill me.

“I was scared to death. So, I knew I was going to take the vaccine—and I was afraid to look into it. This is true, right? Because I knew I was going to take it anyway, and because both of my doctors had told me to take it, because they didn’t know any better. None of us knew at the time that they were suppressing accurate information. I didn’t know that. Neither did my doctors.

“At that time, we didn’t know there were other doctors out there with another narrative. I didn’t know about the Great Barrington Declaration. I didn’t know there were leading scientists and doctors who had a different idea. I didn’t know what a criminal Dr. Fauci was. I didn’t know that he did the same thing in the AIDS crisis.

“So, I took the vaccine, I got sick, and never got better. It was just horrible side effects. I had 180/120 blood pressure. I could have had a stroke at any moment. I had nerve pain, nerve damage. I was diagnosed with occipital neuralgia, which if you know what that is, it’s the most wicked stiff neck you’ve ever had in your life.

“I had joint pain, exhaustion, shortness of breath. I had it for months. Luckily, [I found doctors] who were on the forefront of treating people who were vaccine injured … and they had a theory. My doctor was Dr. [Ram] Yogendra. He was working with [Dr.] Bruce Patterson and their idea was that people who got vaccine injured would be presenting as if they had long COVID.

“They did a special blood test. He showed me my biological markers and said, ‘You are presenting as if you had long COVID, but you’ve never had COVID. So, you got this from the vax’ … They gave me fluvoxamine, azithromycin, and ivermectin. And when he gave me ivermectin, I was like, ‘Hey, what’s this? I thought this was that horse paste.’

“That’s when it was explained to me that we were being lied to on a scale that our minds can’t comprehend. That ivermectin not only is not dangerous, it’s not only for animals, it’s a human medicine.

In fact, it won the Nobel Prize for human medicine, and it’s on the World Health Organization’s list of essential medicines, has been prescribed billions of times and has saved billions of lives, and is less toxic than Tylenol.

“I was like, ‘Are you kidding me?’ And he said, ‘Jimmy, before COVID, they were looking at ivermectin to treat cancer. It was considered a wonder drug. And the reason why they’re lying about it now is because if ivermectin treats COVID, they can’t get their emergency use authorization for these vaccines’ …

“So that was like, ‘Oh my god, they’re lying about it.’ This is just a big money grab. And as soon as I figured that out, and no matter what I looked into, they were lying about it.”

All Lies

As Dore eventually realized, the medical establishment lied not only about ivermectin, but also about hydroxychloroquine and early treatments.

They lied about herd immunity and natural immunity.

They lied about masks.

They lied when they said the COVID jab prevents transmission and could end the pandemic.

They lied about the safety of the shots, and about the seriousness of the virus itself too.

“The virus was never a serious virus,” Dore says. “Bill Gates, after he cashed in his stock, money that he invested in Pfizer, then he started telling people the truth. He said, ‘Yeah, well, the virus, it isn’t that deadly. It has a low fatality rate.’ This is a direct quote …

“It affects the elderly and those with comorbidities, kind of like the flu, but a little different. The average age of death from COVID is over the age of life expectancy, but we’re vaccinating high schoolers … children and babies. This is a criminal act on an unbelievable scale. And they’re still doing it because they own the media and because they’ve gotten away with it and because they have immunity from lawsuits.

“Why do you need immunity from a lawsuit? Why do you need that if it’s safe and effective if you’ve done all the trials? Because it’s not, and you haven’t done all the trials. That’s why.

“The people who are pushing this are the biggest criminals in the world, and they’ve already proven that they are willing to kill massive amounts of people for profit … It’s the most psychopathic evil system I’ve ever seen. And everybody is OK with it. So, that was my journey.”

On the Vaccine That Isn’t

As noted by Dore, a vaccine that doesn’t block transmission of a virus (and therefore doesn’t prevent you from getting sick) isn’t a vaccine. It’s a therapeutic. We now know for a fact that the COVID shots don’t block transmission.

They never even tested to see if it would prevent transmission, which is something I and other scientists pointed out from the very beginning. We also have an abundance of evidence showing the shots do more harm than good.

“More people were injured by the ‘vaccine’ than got saved by it,” Dore says. “Right now, nobody should take it. Omicron is a cold. It has done exactly what Dr. Robert Malone explained on my show in early 2021, that the virus is going to mutate to become way more infectious and less deadly. And that’s exactly what happened.”

During the Omicron wave, Dore got COVID three times, “and it was nothing,” he says. “It was the mildest cold I ever had in my life.” Unfortunately, he made a second mistake the first time he got COVID.

He took Paxlovid and got it again. That Paxlovid makes you prone to reinfection is now also an established fact.

Corruption Will End the US Empire

“What’s happening is we’re run by psychopathic criminals and … people don’t realize that our government is not ‘regular’ corrupt,” Dore says. Most people think of government corruption in terms of Joe Biden giving his son Hunter a cushy job on an energy board in Ukraine, or Donald Trump setting his son up with a business deal in Saudi Arabia.

But the corruption we’re now starting to see is far worse and more widespread than that. It’s been integrated into every part of the government, and every system used to run it.

“The whole thing is corrupt,” Dore says. “The whole COVID policy was corrupt. The whole vaccine rollout 100 percent corrupt. Everything that happens in Congress happens because of grease from the oil of corruption. And if there isn’t corruption in there to grease the wheels, the mechanisms of government don’t run.

“That’s why we can send $100 billion to Ukraine because that’s $100 billion in corruption, while we don’t send $100 billion to the United States to end homelessness. $100 billion dollars could end homelessness three times in the United States, and they won’t send it to our own country because there’s nobody there to make a profit off it … Our legislators make a big profit off war.

“So, we have an endless death economy, and that’s all we can do. We will not invest in our own country. This is called an end of an empire. This is how all empires end, and we’re ending right now …

“We have 1,000 military bases around the world. You know how many Russia has? Three. You know how many China has? I don’t know, two. It’s like nothing. We have 1,000 military bases. We’re the terrorists. We’ve had 400 military bases surrounding China since the Korean War.

“We’re doing a war right now on Russia’s border. Can you imagine if Russia was financing a war against us in Mexico to the tune of $100 billion dollars? Could you imagine if Russia was sending their missiles and their tanks? What do you think we would do? And that’s exactly what’s happening right now.”

We Live in an Illusion of Democracy

As noted by Dore, Russia, China, India, Italy, and Venezuela are now joining forces to create new economic power centers to combat the United States’ hegemony. “And they’re doing it by saber-rattling with two nuclear powers,” Dore says.

“This was the stuff that they said Trump was going to do. Trump actually wasn’t, he was actually a peacenik compared to these guys. Trump didn’t start another war. That’s why they’re arresting him. That’s why they impeached him twice. They had to do an FBI op on January 6.

“The whole thing is, they know that people are done with the oligarchy. They’re done with this two-party duopoly, which is a uniparty because they all work for the same people. The Democrats and the Republicans get paid by the same guys: Wall Street, Big Pharma, health insurance, Silicon Valley, and the military-industrial complex.

“They all work for the same people, which is why we can have an ecological disaster that’s poisoning people in East Palestine, and nobody cares about it in the government, but they will fly to Kiev and promise another $10 billion to a foreign country because corruption is greasing the wheels of that happening …

“We live under a fascist government. Anybody who thinks they’re voting for Democrats and patting themselves on the back like they’re fighting against fascism or white supremacy, I want to disabuse you of that stupid idea. You are not. You are voting for another brand of fascism …

“This idea that you’re going to end fascism by voting for a Democrat—we already live under a fascist government! Your democracy has already been stolen from you. The perfect marriage of corporations and government, that’s what fascism is. That’s why they mandated vaccines. That’s why they gave $100 billion to Ukraine, and they won’t fix homelessness in America.”

Predictions for the Future

Like me, Dore believes things will get far worse before they get better. In terms of overthrowing the corrupt uniparty, he believes we need a brand-new party that hasn’t yet been swallowed by corruption, and his suggestion for Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who is contemplating running for President in 2024, is to ditch the Democratic party and form a new one.

“I wish Bobby Kennedy would run as a third party, and I wish he would organize people to get in the streets,” Dore says. “The guy, he’s a real hope. When you talk to him, you can just sense he’s the real deal … I know he is going to run as a Democrat, and wouldn’t it be great if he proved me wrong? …

“But superdelegates … would find other ways to rig it. Look what they did to Bernie Sanders this last time. They invented a new app for the Iowa primary, and somehow that new app couldn’t count votes. Isn’t that amazing? They couldn’t figure out how many people voted. And who invented that app? A bunch of Democratic Party operatives and donors.

“So, they’re going to invent a way. If it isn’t the superdelegates, which it will be, they will invent new ways to do it, plus the onslaught of the media. Plus, they’ll just say, ‘Oh, he didn’t win. He didn’t get the votes.’ And then if you say, ‘You guys are stealing the election,’ they’ll call you a conspiracy theorist, just like they did to anybody who challenges their elections.

“When the Democrats challenge an election, it’s because they’re good people standing up for democracy like they did against the 2016 election. They say the 2016 election was stolen by Russia. So, that’s OK to say, but you can’t say any other election was stolen or you’re a kook.

“So, our elections weren’t secure enough in 2016 that Donald Trump could win, but they’re so secure in 2020 that you could never have a question about it.

“These people are pathological liars, criminals. We’re ruled by criminals. And I hope Bobby Kennedy gets people in the streets because that’s the only way to get this done. Just like Martin Luther King did, just like Gandhi did. That’s the only way to overthrow [the oligarchy].”

See more here theepochtimes.com

Bold emphasis added

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Read More
feed

The Renewed Scientific Opposition to Water Fluoridation

Published on

Written by Christy Prais

Fluoridation of the U.S. public water supply has been a polarizing topic both academically and politically since its start in the 1940s. Debate over its benefits and health risks has raged on as the science has continued to unfold

This series will explore the contentious findings surrounding this ubiquitous public health measure and answer the question of whether water fluoridation poses a risk and what we should do about it.

We’ve all grown up being told that fluoride is good for our teeth. Some experts thought it was so good for the health of our teeth that in the 1940s, the U.S. government decided to start adding synthetic fluoride to the U.S. water supply.

From very early on, there have been conflicting views and significant debate within the scientific, medical, and dental communities over the merits of fluoride. In her paper published in The American Journal of Public Health in 2015, historian Catherine Carstairs recounts that in the late 1940s and early 1950s, this debate largely ended with experts opposed to the fluoridation program being dismissed “as cranks and quacks,” and relegated to the so-called fringes by their peers.

After more than 70 years, the battle between the pro-fluoride and no-fluoride camps wages on. At the heart of that battle are questions about how effective water fluoridation is at preventing dental decay and whether the possible adverse health risks are worth the benefits.

Water Wars

The big guns on the pro-fluoridation side, such as the American Dental Association and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), support community water fluoridation as an effective way to prevent tooth decay.

Both groups say the safety and benefits of fluoride for preventing tooth decay in both children and adults are “well documented and have been reviewed” by several “scientific and public health organizations.”

The CDC claims there has been “no convincing scientific evidence” found “linking community water fluoridation with any potential adverse health effect or systemic disorder such as an increased risk for cancer, Down syndrome, heart disease, osteoporosis and bone fracture, immune disorders, low intelligence, renal disorders, Alzheimer’s disease, or allergic reactions.”

But the actual science is less one-sided than the CDC suggests. A 2018 research review published in Preventative Nutrition and Food Sciences looked at both the pros and cons of fluoridation.

“Major concerns about excessive fluoride intake and related toxicity were raised worldwide, leading several countries to ban fluoridation,” it noted.

Opponents of water fluoridation include the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) and Food and Water Watch. Their criticism focuses on the possible health risks revealed in more than 100 published studies showing the harmful effects of fluoride including neurotoxic harm, reduced IQ, damaged kidneys and liver, suppressed thyroid hormones, and brittle bones.

Dental Data

While it’s fairly well established that putting fluoride on the teeth can help combat cavities, there is less clarity around the benefits of drinking it. Advocates of water fluoridation point to population-level data to support these programs.

An October 1999 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly report from the CDC noted that early studies reported that water fluoridation can reduce tooth decay by 50 percent to 70 percent.

The report stated that between 1960 and 1970, unpublished data showed that the new fluorination program reduced decayed, missing teeth due to caries, and filled teeth in the permanent teeth of 12-year-olds by 68 percent.

But, the report said, a later review of studies on the effectiveness of water fluoridation conducted in the United States from 1979 to 1989 found that caries reduction was 8 to 37 percent among adolescents.

Part of the problem with the data is that better dental hygiene practices, including the introduction of fluoride toothpaste came about at the same time as water fluoridation programs.

Studies conducted after this change cited by the Fluoride Action Network further discount the dental benefits of water fluoridation.

One of their cited studies done between 1986 and 1987 and submitted for publication in the Danish journal Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology looked for dental caries in 39,207 school children 5 to 17 years old across 84 different geographical areas.

This study found no statistically significant difference between the number of dental caries in the fluoridated verse the non-fluoridated groups across all age groups.

Today, the CDC says that water fluoridation reduces tooth decay by about “25 percent in children and adults,” and the agency has named community water fluoridation as “1 of 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century,” because it has “contributed to the dramatic decline in tooth decay over the past 70 years.”

A Harvard review of data gathered by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development is less glowing. Looking at the average number of decayed, missing, or filled teeth between 1975 and 2014 in different countries, it compared nine countries that fluoridated their public water to 22 countries that didn’t.

Per a Harvard Public Health Magazine article, the data showed that countries that didn’t fluoridate their water had also seen similar drops in cavity rates over that time period.

Despite more than 73 percent of the U.S. population currently being on a fluoridated community water system, tooth decay remains the most prevalent chronic disease in both children and adults, even though it’s largely preventable.

The Battle Wages On

This 70-year battle reached a new level in 2017, when a landmark lawsuit by a coalition of groups including the FAN and the Food & Water Watch was filed against the Environmental Protection Agency to “protect the public and susceptible subpopulations from the neurotoxic risks of fluoride by banning the addition of fluoridation chemicals to water.”

Because of many delays brought on by the EPA, this David-and-Goliath battle is still ongoing, with its next scheduled court hearing on April 11.

The suit has brought into question annual fluoride participation awards given to communities across the United States by the CDC, Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors, and the American Dental Association.

The case also recently revealed government attempts to limit available evidence and avoid having the facts of water fluoridation reviewed in court.

Per court order, the suppressed National Toxicology Program’s (NTP’s) draft review has recently been made public.

The NTP’s “2019 Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Health Effects” concluded that “fluoride is presumed to be a cognitive neurodevelopmental hazard to humans.” They state that “this conclusion is based on a consistent pattern of findings in human studies across several different populations showing that higher fluoride exposure is associated with decreased IQ or other cognitive impairments in children.”

Per the NTP, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine committee criticized the NTP’s classification of fluoride as a cognitive neurodevelopmental hazard for humans, saying they hadn’t adequately supported its conclusions. The May 2022 draft, although public, is still under review and not yet finalized.

Over the next several articles, we’ll take a closer look at the toxicity profiles of fluoride additives, the controversy around how they’re made, and the questionable scientific research that the fluoridation of the U.S. public water supply was based on.

In the next article: The fluoride additives in our public water system aren’t naturally occurring, which opponents and chemical data research suggest make them even more toxic to human health.

See more here theepochtimes.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Read More
feed

Satellite Data Shows No Global Warming For Eight Years, Nine Months

Published on

Written by Issues and Insights

Yet again, the society of climate alarmists tells us we have little time left to address global warming. It’s a sign of desperation

What else can the merchants of madness do when we’re now closing in on nine years of a warming pause?

Last month the New York Times published an article that we swear we have read before.

“Earth is likely to cross a critical threshold for global warming within the next decade, and nations will need to make an immediate and drastic shift away from fossil fuels to prevent the planet from overheating dangerously beyond that level,” the Times’ climate scribe wrote, citing a “major new report” issued by the United Nations’ IPCC.

The IPCC paper reveals that “there is still one last chance to shift course.” But it will – naturally – “​​require industrialized nations to join together immediately to slash greenhouse gases roughly in half by 2030 and then stop adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere altogether by the early 2050s.”

How many other times have we heard that we were either approaching our last chance to save ourselves from global warming, or that our opportunity to do what is “right” had already passed us by?

So many deadlines, so many “now or nevers” have come and gone that it’s almost impossible to track them all.

The climate cranks are like the doomsday cultists who have the end of the world marked on their calendars and when it doesn’t arrive they say, “Whoops, my math was bad. Let me recalculate and I’ll get back to you with a new date.”

While the international hotheads are screeching about impending doom, levelheaded observers point to data that clearly show a pause in warming, which has been mild and as likely natural as it is human-caused, has now reached eight years and nine months.

There has been no rise in global temperatures from July 2015 to March 2023.

This fact-based claim draws on satellite readings from the University of Alabama in Huntsville that measure temperatures in the troposphere (image below), a much more accurate method of keeping score than the shoddy records produced by ground-based weather stations.

“The start and end dates of the New Pause are not cherry-picked,” writes Christopher Monckton, an adviser for Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who now consults with the Heartland Institute on climate policy. “The end date is the present; the start date is the farthest back one can reach and still find a zero trend. It is what it is.”

But why not go back further, maybe to the beginning of the satellite measurements? What do the data say then?

Not much, at least not anything to be alarmed by.

“The entire dataset for 44 years four months since December 1978,” says Monckton, “shows a less than terrifying long-run warming rate equivalent to 1.3 degrees/century, of which 0.3” degrees has already occurred, leaving a single degree “to go (on the current trend) until 2100.”

Of course, the warming racket will either ignore the pause or attack the messenger. Fact-checkers will skip the truth whenever possible and bend it when they can’t. And the cycle of fearmongering will roll on.

See more here climatechangedispatch

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Read More