Are The COVID19 Magnetic Jabs Claims Real?

Published on June 5, 2021Written by John O’Sullivan

Fears that COVID19 vaccines are likely super-magnetic are borne out by a 2014 peer-reviewed PubMed paper which affirms unequivocally that nanometer-sized magnetite particles ARE added to vaccine solutions to boost DNA jab effectiveness. BBC beclowns itself denying all such ‘magnetic’ jabs claims.

The paper, which was first published in 2014 in the National Library of Medicine is titled ‘Superparamagnetic nanoparticle delivery of DNA vaccine.’ [1]
The ‘Abstract’ from the above paper tells readers:

“The efficiency of delivery of DNA vaccines is often relatively low compared to protein vaccines. The use of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) to deliver genes via magnetofection shows promise in improving the efficiency of gene delivery both in vitro and in vivo. “
Dozens of videos have appeared on social media claiming to show that there is a super-magnetized protein included in the experimental COVID19 ‘vaccines’ that astonishingly causes magnets, cell phones and other metallic objects sticking to people’s arms. See below:

Other peer reviewed published papers in respected journals that likewise validate the claims that this isn’t conspiracy theory but cold, hard scientific fact include
Fake news peddlers such as the BBC were quick to shoot down alternative media claims that many people who have had the unproven, toxic COVID potions were suddenly experiencing magnetisation of their arms where the jabs went in.
The BBC’s propaganda machine attempted to quell questions among the sheeple with this little ‘fact check’ fakery on May 22, 2021:

The lying BBC claims that:

Some people say there must be something magnetic in the vaccines and others have gone further to say it’s proof of a microchip – a theory which just isn’t true. BBC Reality Check’s Jack Goodman debunks the so-called #magnetchallenge.

However, the science tells a different story!

The above study from Science Direct [2] tells us:
“Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) have drawn attention because of their excellent superparamagnetic properties such as controllable size, large surface area-to-volume ratio, and nontoxicity. Surface functionalization of SPIONs with therapeutic molecules, including antimicrobial agents, has been successfully used in nanomedicine. Through application of an external magnetic field, antimicrobial-loaded SPIONs can be guided to the desired infection site allowing a direct and specific therapeutic effect with minimum side effects. The great advantage of SPIONs is their magnetic properties that allow direct delivery of matter into the pathogen zone without influencing the whole organism, which incites an increasing interest in the development of antimicrobial SPIONs.”

The BBC’s biased and dishonest video (watch here) makes no mention whatsoever of this proven technology. Why is that?

The following peer-reviewed studies show that BBC fact checkers are no such thing but merely servants of their eugenicist billionaire masters. We are under a sustained psyops attack by Big Media that wants to dupe us all into accepting the evil COVID jab.
To further emphasis the point, below is a selection of verifiable published science studies affirming that current medical technology provides the means such that COVID19 ‘vaccines’ may well contain super-magnetic proteins (SPIONs):

Superparamagnetic nanoparticles for effective delivery of malaria DNA vaccine.
Al-Deen FN, Ho J, Selomulya C, Ma C, Coppel R.Langmuir. 2011 Apr 5;27(7):3703-12. doi: 10.1021/la104479c. Epub 2011 Mar 1.PMID: 21361304

Polyethyleneimine-associated polycaprolactone-Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as a gene delivery vector.
Kim MC, Lin MM, Sohn Y, Kim JJ, Kang BS, Kim DK.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017 Jan;105(1):145-154. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33519. Epub 2015 Oct 6.PMID: 26443109

Magnetofection: a reproducible method for gene delivery to melanoma cells.
Prosen L, Prijic S, Music B, Lavrencak J, Cemazar M, Sersa G.Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:209452. doi: 10.1155/2013/209452. Epub 2013 Jun 3.PMID: 23862136 Free PMC article.

Recent advances in superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) for in vitro and in vivo cancer nanotheranostics.
Kandasamy G, Maity D.Int J Pharm. 2015 Dec 30;496(2):191-218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.058. Epub 2015 Oct 28.PMID: 26520409 Review.

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers.
Wahajuddin, Arora S.Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:3445-71. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S30320. Epub 2012 Jul 6.PMID: 22848170

All you need do is conduct your own internet search for ‘Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle‘  and/or SPIONs and you will see countless examples that are apparently invisible/unavailable to those hard-working, diligent BBC ‘fact checkers’ striving so hard to get the planet ‘vaccinated’ against a non-existent deadly virus.
So, if unpaid citizen journalists can readily verify the truthfulness of these new claims, why is that highly-paid professional journalists cannot discern the same facts?

[1] ‘Superparamagnetic nanoparticle delivery of DNA vaccine’ DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0410-5_12
About John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI).  John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Portland Men Who Shot and Killed Pregnant Woman During Burglary Sentenced to Only 7.5 and 10 Years in Prison, Respectively

On Friday, Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt announced the convictions of two men found guilty in the shooting death of a 21-year-old pregnant woman inside her Portland, Oregon, apartment in August of 2014. 27-year-old De’Anthony Simmons and 29-year-old Kelani Brown pleaded guilty to charges of Manslaughter in the Second Degree with a Firearm and […]
The post Portland Men Who Shot and Killed Pregnant Woman During Burglary Sentenced to Only 7.5 and 10 Years in Prison, Respectively appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes.

How to Win the War Against Tyranny

STORY AT-A-GLANCE Make Americans Free Again, led by Pam Popper, is fighting to preserve American freedoms and has a proven strategy that ensures we can win They are launching strategic legal challenges across the U.S. Rather than arguing the unconstitutionality of mandates, they challenge the legal basis of the emergency declaration that allowed the mandates […]
The post How to Win the War Against Tyranny appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes.

Baby of ‘fully vaxxed’ mom dies after born bleeding from mouth, nose

Published on December 30, 2021Written by

A baby whose mother received two COVID vaccine shots during her last trimester of pregnancy was born bleeding from his mouth and nose, and died the day after his birth, according to a recent report to the U.S. government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System from a foreign “regulatory authority.”

The baby boy was born on the morning of October 6, 2021, after his mother received two experimental mRNA Moderna shots on July 19 and August 13. He was expected on October 15 but was delivered weighing 2,800 grams (just over six pounds, two ounces) in hospital after a labor marked by unstable fetal heartbeat.
“The doctor said that after the patient was born, there was a cry. When the umbilical cord was cut for newborn care, the nursing staff found that the patient had symptoms of oral and nose bleeding, and immediately asked the pediatrician to intubate and give him oxygen, and he was admitted to the NICU,” according to the report received by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) November 18 from an unidentified foreign health agency. “In the NICU, his result of examination showed abnormal blood coagulation, pulmonary hemorrhage [acute bleeding from the lungs], and cardiac dysfunction.”
According to the VAERS report (No. 1879991) on the death following “transplacental exposure” to the mRNA vaccine, it was unknown if an autopsy was performed and no cause of death was reported, but the infant’s father suspected it was related to the vaccine.
The infant death is one of 52 reported deaths among 30,550 adverse events recorded by VAERS for children under 17 years old as of December 3.
Among the other reports:

Another nursing newborn, who was pending discharge from hospital, suddenly developed problems after his mother received a second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on September 9. Within 24 hours, the baby experienced a significant drop in heart rate, low oxygen in the blood causing him to turn blue, and he developed difficulties sucking and swallowing. An ultrasound of his head revealed brain blood clots that “were not present prior to vaccination,” according to the VAERS report, which concludes that baby was transferred to higher level of care for neurological evaluation.
A report on a five-year-old girl in Iowa who had underlying health conditions but was doing well is among those recently added to VAERS. She was injected with Pfizer’s vaccine November 18 and was monitored in hospital. She was discharged from hospital a day later, but her father found her pulseless and not breathing. She had died unexpectedly during the night, three days after the shot.
An 11-year-old girl from the state of Georgia died the same day that she was vaccinated with Pfizer’s vaccine meant for children over the age of 12. No cause was stated in the VAERS report.
An eight-year-old boy from Wyoming who was “totally healthy and active” prior to receiving a first dose of Pfizer’s COVID pediatric shot was hospitalized in an Intensive Care Unit with myocarditis, an inflammatory life-threatening heart condition, two days later in November.
A previously healthy10-year-old girl in Oregon developed chest pain and had difficulty breathing and was hospitalized for myocarditis four days after getting Pfizer’s shot, even though she had already had COVID a year earlier.
In September, a 14-year-old from North Carolina received a first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine and the following day was drooling, could only mumble when speaking and was in an “altered state” at his school, when an ambulance was called and he was taken to hospital where he was diagnosed with a stroke and had surgery to remove clot from his brain.
A 13-year-old from Maryland suffered a fatal heart attack 15 days after receiving a Pfizer shot.
A nine-year-old girl in Southern California had a seizure lasting 30 seconds about a minute after receiving her first dose of COVID vaccine in November.
A 16-year-old Wisconsin girl with cancer whose death report was received by VAERS in November was found deceased in her bed the third morning after her shot in September with “excessive amounts of blood along with large blood clots that appear to have come vaginally.” No autopsy was ordered, according to the report.

Toddler death scrubbed from data
Other recent reports to VAERS include the death of a two-year-old Alaska boy following COVID vaccination. The report of his death briefly appeared in reports posted on VAERS. The record said the boy “began bleeding out the mouth, eyes, nose and ears within six hours of the shot” and died the same evening.
The report appeared briefly on the VAERS website on Thanksgiving Monday in a batch of 14,529 records which were downloaded, according to a VAERS analysis website run by an anonymous data tracker. The retracted reports were then reloaded onto the website on December 3, but the record of the two-year-old’s death was not among them.
While no COVID vaccine has been authorized for children as young as two, numerous reports of accidental vaccinations of children with adult doses, or children who mistakenly received COVID shots instead of other vaccines for their age group are recorded.
A four- and five-year-old brother and sister both received adult-dose COVID vaccines instead of flu shots from a Walgreens pharmacy and developed heart complications afterwards, for example.
The Food and Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for Pfizer’s abortion-tainted COVID vaccine for children aged five to 11 on October 29, 2021 so more data on that age bracket can be expected to be recorded to VAERS in the coming months, especially as mandates are introduced.
The vaccine is experimental and uses a novel gene therapy that hijacks cellular machinery to manufacture spike protein which the body is meant to manufacture antibodies against.
LifeSite asked the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to confirm the case and why it was removed from the database, but the agency’s media group did not respond to the questions.
In Canada, when Independent Member of Provincial Parliament Rick Nicholls asked Ontario Minister of Health Christine Elliot about the reported rise in stillbirths among vaccinated mothers in the province this week, the government ignored his questions and refused to answer.
Bleeding disorders
Bleeding disorders are described in thousands of VAERS reports including 2,177 records of deaths following COVID vaccination. Many of these reports include descriptions of patients experiencing nosebleeds, blood in stool from gastric bleeds, brain bleeds, bruising, and bleeding from the mouth.
One VAERS report describes a five-month-old breastfeeding baby who died from a rare autoimmune bleeding disorder, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) after developing a rash the day following his mother received a COVID vaccine.
TTP has been reported in a number of people who had been vaccinated with AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson’s vaccines. A Norwegian study put the rate at one case in 26,000 vaccine doses. If this rate were to be applied to 76 million American vaccinated children, 2,923 children could be expected to develop the potentially lethal bleeding disorder.
Among VAERS reports for six- to 17-year-olds are 1,094 serious heart conditions, most for potentially lethal myocarditis and pericarditis, and most (997) following Pfizer’s vaccine.
Health Canada reports 1,428 instances of myocarditis/pericarditis among 1,598 cardiac disorders, affecting those an average age of 27 but children as young as 11. The agency received 1,138 reports from healthcare professionals of bleeding and blood clotting disorders after COVID vaccination in Canada.
Most injuries in VAERS are neurological, according to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., president of the Children’s Health Defense, who testified earlier this week to a Louisiana House Health and Welfare Committee considering a bill to add COVID vaccines to the mandated vaccine schedule for children in the state.
Pfizer lied
Kennedy said Pfizer hid at least one serious injury to a child in its vaccine trial, which included only 1,100 children. Maddie De Gary, a 12-year-old girl from Cincinnati, Ohio who took part in Pfizer’s trial and immediately developed a fever and seizures, is permanently disabled by the vaccine, but Pfizer pretends she does not exist. “She is in a wheelchair for life. She can only eat through a feeding tube through her nose,” said Kennedy. “She was one of the 1,100 children. When we went back and looked at Pfizer’s study, they said Maddie De Gary had a stomachache. So, they lied.”
“If one in 1,1000 children look like this, this is an injury that will affect 75,000 [American] children,” if 76 million American children are force-vaccinated, Kennedy added.
Kennedy called the COVID vaccine the “deadliest vaccine ever made,” showing a graphic illustrating COVID vaccine injury logged by the U..S. government in eight months since its rollout comprising more than half of all vaccine injuries recorded to the agency in 33 years.
So far, uptake of the experimental shots for children has remained low in some regions of the country. In Butte Country, California, just 3% of eligible children under 12 have been doubly vaccinated and six percent have received one shot. In Shasta County, just 4.7 percent of children have taken a first dose of Pfizer’s lucrative experimental injection.
State data show that the Bay Area counties including San Francisco have the highest vaccination rates ranging from 26 to 51 percent with at least one dose, but the statewide average for five- to 11-year-olds is 13.5 percent.
Although reports to VAERS do not confirm that a vaccine caused an injury, a major Harvard-Pilgrim study also showed that only a fraction – as little as one percent – of vaccine effects that should be reported to the government are in fact reported.
See more here:
Header image: Sky News
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 


Trackback from your site.

CO2’s Role In The Great ‘Climate Change’ Deception

Published on December 29, 2021Written by Climate Change Dispatch

World history is replete with imaginary gods and demons that man has blamed for conditions and events beyond human control.

From 1300 AD to 1880, the Northern Hemisphere experienced a cooling period called the “Little Ice Age.”
During that period, many people irrationally believed that the cold temperatures were caused by witches. During the preceeding Medieval Warm Period, witches had been blamed for ‘cooking the weather’. As a result, many witches were identified, tried, and executed.
One hundred years later, people began to complain that the weather was becoming “too warm.” Man’s imagination then again created a new demon to blame for the warmer weather: anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2).
Demon adherents proclaim that if atmospheric CO2 is not immediately reduced to pre-industrial levels, the glaciers will melt, and our coastal cities will be submerged by rising seas.
Unfortunately, the irrational belief that anthropogenic CO2 will lead to future catastrophe, has become a “mass movement” with all the hallmarks of a religion. See, “The True Believer,” by Eric Hoffer (1951).
Computer “climate models” now blame CO2 for the warmer weather and issue dire predictions of impending doom if CO2 levels are not reduced.
Al Gore, the CO2 oracle, and Greta Thunberg, the child prophet, tell their “true believer” followers that burning fossil fuels is sinful and, if not stopped, will result in future catastrophe.
Those “true believers” have closed their minds to opposing views and refuse to acknowledge any information that does not fit the imaginary climate disaster scenario.
They also ignore the harsh reality that modern world economies are based upon massive infrastructures, completely dependent upon fossil fuels that can never be replaced by windmills and solar panels. (Anyone for a battery-powered aircraft?)
Finally, they treat the thousands of scientists, who inform us that the CO2 molecules now being added to the atmosphere have not had, and will not have, any adverse effect whatsoever on the climate, as though they did not exist.
As a matter of scientific fact, only natural forces beyond human control can increase the average temperature of the Earth.
Modern science teaches us that increases and decreases in global temperatures over decades, centuries, and millennia have been, and still are, solely the result of a combination of natural heating and cooling forces that are all beyond human control:

Changes in the radiation intensity of the Sun (sunspots, mass coronal ejections, etc.).
Changes in the Earth’s orbit and its tilt to the sun.
Changes in the radiation and heating of the oceans and land by the Earth’s molten core.
The aerosol effects of volcanos blocking sunlight.
The albedo effects of constantly changing clouds, ice, and snow (including the volume of cosmic rays that may affect cloudiness).

All of the many heating and cooling periods the Earth has experienced for millions of years – before the industrial revolution – were solely the result of those natural and uncontrollable heating and cooling forces.
The climate models, however, are programmed on the assumption that additional atmospheric CO2 causes global temperatures to increase.
In reality, however, ancient ice-core data demonstrates that rising global temperatures always precede increases in atmospheric CO2 by several hundred years – not vice versa, as the climate models falsely predict.
Consequently, claims that the recent minuscule increase of CO2 molecules in the atmosphere is the sole “cause” of the current warming trend are scientific fraud.
Modern-day climatologists can roughly approximate changes in average global temperatures and have concluded that since 1960, the average temperature of the Earth has increased by about 1-degree Celsius.
During that same period, they have also found that the CO2 content of the atmosphere, as measured at Mona Loa, has increased from 0.031 percent to 0.041 percent.
Or, in terms of additional molecules, the number of CO2 molecules in a cubic meter of air has risen by 100 parts per million (ppm), from 310 in 1960 to 410 ppm today. [The atmosphere is composed of 78 percent nitrogen, 20 percent oxygen, one percent argon, and 0-4 percent water vapor. The remaining one percent of the atmosphere is comprised of “trace gases:” 0.04 percent carbon dioxide, 0.00182 percent neon, and 0.000175 percent methane.]
The correlation of the tiny 0.01 percent increase in CO2 with the modest one-degree increase in temperature over the last 60 years would normally be dismissed as a mere coincidence. Indeed, the scientific method demands that all other possible causes be evaluated and dismissed before designating a simple correlation as a “cause.”
“True believers,” however, including the climate modelers themselves, simply disregard any other more likely natural causes. That total disregard for all other possibilities, probabilities, and contrary views constitutes scientific fraud.
The trace gas CO2 does NOT act as a “blanket” to increase the Earth’s temperature. Many proponents of a CO2 catastrophe liken the effect of the additional 100 ppm CO2 molecules to an insulating blanket that increases the Earth’s temperature.
Those trace CO2 molecules, however, neither form a “blanket,” “trap heat,” nor send heat back to the surface. Only water vapor can “trap latent heat” for a short time until the vapor condenses, and the heat is radiated to space. [“Heat” is defined as the kinetic movement of molecules. “Radiation” is defined as the energy force that causes kinetic movement].
All of the gases comprising the atmosphere are constantly moving the radiant energy emitted by the Earth’s warm surface, per the Second Law of Thermodynamics, up and out to the vacuum space by conduction, convection, and radiation.
In that massive continuous process, the additional 100 ppm of anthropogenic CO2 molecules are only along for the ride like a few new feathers on a bird. While those CO2 molecules do absorb “fingerprint” IR radiation at the narrow IR 15-micron band, that absorption is an integral part of the basic natural cooling process.
It raises the CO2 molecule’s kinetic motion, which is instantaneously transferred to all surrounding molecules by conduction and radiation. Accordingly, the additional 100 ppm CO2 molecules create NO additional “heat” in the atmosphere.
Nor do they “delay” the emission of radiation to space. They merely participate in the constant transfer of kinetic and radiative energy, by atmospheric molecules, from the surface through the atmosphere to outer space.
The Rise of the CO2 Imaginary Climate Model Demon.
In 1988, NASA scientist James Hansen testified before the U.S. Senate Energy Committee that “the greenhouse effect has been detected, and it is changing our climate now.”
People around the world began to talk about how the “greenhouse effect” from anthropogenic CO2 was creating rising temperatures across the planet. That same year, the United Nations established the Intgovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to study the causes and effects of “global warming.”
The IPCC then developed a contingent of “general circulation climate models” (GCMs) that formed the basis of its First Climate Assessment in 1990. The operators of those mysterious computer models, just like the Wizard of Oz, then announced with – “certainty”:
Emissions resulting from human activities are substantially increasing the atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gasses: carbon dioxide, methane, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), and nitrous oxide. These increases will enhance the greenhouse effect, resulting on average in an additional warming of the Earth’s surface. The main greenhouse gas, water vapor, will increase in response to global warming and further enhance it.
No one, of course, was in a position to challenge the pronouncements of the climate model wizards because no one knew how the models were programmed.
We later learned that the working hypothesis for programing the models was simply the unfounded assumption that the 1-degree rise in average temperature since 1960 was the result of the additional anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere.
Those 100 ppm new CO2 molecules, in turn, purportedly caused water vapor to increase – an assumption that is conveniently impossible to validate with actual measurement.
The “climate model wizardry” then makes the further assumption, again without evidence, that a doubling of CO2 (300 ppm to 600 ppm) will reduce the radiation leaving the atmosphere by 3.4 watts per square meter, thereby increasing the Earth’s temperature.
The computer models, of course, performed as intended and predicted catastrophe unless man-made CO2 and other greenhouse gases were reduced.
They couldn’t do anything else, they were programmed to reach that conclusion.
All of the so-called “science” that now predicts climate catastrophe is based solely on the predictions of those faulty IPCC models. No other basis in actual physical “science” exists to support the dire predictions.
The international campaign to designate anthropogenic CO2 as the primary cause of current and future global warming culminated in 1997 in a U.N. sponsored conference in Kyoto, Japan. At that time, many nations, including the United States, signed an agreement requiring drastic reductions of man-made greenhouse gases in the future.
Scientific Opposition to the IPCC’s CO2 Climate Model Deception.
The Kyoto agreement sparked a countermovement by scientists who believed that the minuscule 0.01 percent increase in CO2 since 1960 had nothing to do with the one-degree increase in average world temperature over the same 60-year period.
Most scientists viewed that gradual increase in temperature simply as part of the earth’s normal cycles between warm and cold periods and the much longer cycles of glaciation and glacier retreat.
Therefore, in 1998, Arthur B. Robinson of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine and Frederick Seitz, Past President of the National Academy of Sciences USA, circulated the following petition to thousands of scientists urging the U.S. government to reject the Kyoto Agreement:
“We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”
The Petition was ultimately signed by 31,487 scientists and is fully set forth on the website, where all signatories are listed under various categories. The Exemplar Petition on the website is signed by Dr. Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb.
Since 1998, no organization has attempted to circulate a counter-petition containing any “scientific evidence” demonstrating that anthropogenic CO2 is the cause of the current warming trend. That is because there is no such “scientific evidence” – only conjecture by the climate modelers.
The IPCC, however, paid no attention to the Petition and, in 2007, issued its Fourth Assessment which elucidated the purported basis of its hypothesis that man-made CO2 was leading the world to climate catastrophe.
The IPCC asserted that the increased average temperature of the Earth was caused by “back radiation” from the minuscule 100 parts per million of CO2 molecules that man has added to the atmosphere since 1960.
According to the Assessment, those molecules absorb a certain spectrum of infrared radiation from the surface and purportedly “re-radiate” that spectra back to the surface where it is again absorbed by the Earth to increase the temperature of the atmosphere. A diagram by one of the IPCC’s lead authors illustrated that fictitious process.
The Scientific Take-Down of the Imaginary CO2 Climate Model Demon.
In 2009, two distinguished German physicists published a paper that disproved the IPCC’s unsupported hypotheses of “back radiation.” See Falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame of Physics, by Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, Vol. 23, No. 3, (2009) and rebuttal in the same Volume at pp. 1333-59.
Since that time, G&T’s falsification of the anthropogenic CO2 hypothesis has never been effectively challenged by any reputable physicist. On the contrary, many eminent scientists from all over the world have published papers confirming G&T’s basic conclusions.
See, for example;
Slaying the Sky Dragon, various authors (2011);
Observations on ‘Backradiation’ During Daytime and Nighttime, by Professor Nasif Nahle, Principia Scientific International (2011);
Refutation of the Greenhouse Effect Theory on a Thermodynamic and Hydrostatic Basis, by Alberto Miatello, Principia Scientific International (2012);
Is No “Greenhouse Effect” Possible From The Way That IPCC Define It?, by John Elliston, Principia Scientific International (2015) [“The presence of GH gases does not change the energy input. If the absorbed energy input remains unchanged, the output of energy cannot change.”];
Role of Greenhouse Gases in Climate Change, by Martin Herzberg, Alan Siddons, and Hans Schreuder, Energy and Environment, Vol. 28, Issue 4 (2017);
The Layman’s Guide to the Greatest Scientific Fraud in History, by Joseph E. Postma (2019).
Sky Dragon Slayers Victory Lap, various authors (2019);
Bottom line: The imaginary CO2 climate model demon is based upon a demonstrably false physical hypothesis that has been disproved by many eminent scientists worldwide.
Nevertheless, millions of people have adopted the “religious belief” that burning fossil fuels is a sin that will lead to a glacial melt and sea-level rise catastrophe. Therefore, it is long past time that the new “CO2 Climate Change religion” be recognized for what it is – nothing more than sophisticated climate model fraud.
See more here:
Bold emphasis added
Header image: Facebook
About the author: Don Crockett served the U.S. Department of Energy as an attorney for more than 30 years. During that time, he dealt with many technical and scientific issues such as nuclear waste and the hypothesis that man-made CO2 is the cause of the Earth’s current warming period.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 


Trackback from your site.

President Biden Greeted by Trump Flag, ‘Let’s Go, Brandon’ Chant in Kentucky

Billionaire Elon Musk handed Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) the most epic insult as the two were feuding over taxes. Musk referred to the progressive senator as “Senator Karen” in a pretty wonderful Twitter thread.

On Monday Elon Musk was announced as TIME Magazine’s “Person of the Year.” Senator Warren did not congratulate Musk, but rather, took to Twitter to demand he pay more taxes. “Let’s change the rigged tax code so The Person of the Year will actually pay taxes and stop freeloading off everyone else” she tweeted alongside a Boston Globe article about the TIME announcement.
Short but sweet, Musk responded “Stop projecting!” with a link to a Fox News article discussing how “Sen. Elizabeth Warren repeatedly and deliberately sought to benefit in her personal, academic and employment life by posing as a Native American.”

TRENDING‘Let’s Go Brandon’ Flies the Friendly Skies: Southwest Pilot Signs off to Passengers with Phrase
Musk added a few more digs, continuing the thread with “you remind me of when I was a kid and my friend’s angry Mom would just randomly yell at everyone for no reason.” Not done yet, Musk added one final tweet, “Please don’t call the manager on me, Senator Karen.”
According to Forbes, Musk is the world’s wealthiest man with a net worth of $252 billion. “The spat comes as Warren and other DC Democrats mull wealth taxes and other measures that could potentially put Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg on the hook for billions of dollars by taxing their unrealized gains” reports The Post.

Musk has a history of taking jabs at progressive Democrats on Twitter. The Post put together a few:
In November, Oregon Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden reiterated his support for a wealth tax for billionaires on Twitter.
“Why does ur pp look like u just came?” responded Musk in apparent reference to the senator’s profile photo.
Musk also attacked Sen. Bernie Sanders that same month after the Vermont independent expressed support for raising taxes on billionaires.
“I keep forgetting that you’re still alive,” replied Musk.
“Want me to sell more stock, Bernie? Just say the word …” the mogul added in reference to the billions of dollars of Tesla shares he has sold this year to cover tax bills.

You may like

Oregon Governor’s new mask mandate applies to outdoor venues and the vaccinated

Aug 27, 2021 By Jenny Goldsberry Oregon Governor Kate Brown announced a state-wide mask mandate Tuesday. Now, Brown expects all Oregonians, vaccinated or otherwise, to wear masks indoors and outdoors. The mandate will go into effect Friday. “Today we have 1,000 COVID-19 patients in our hospitals,” Brown tweeted along the announcement. “I’m continuing to take … Read more

How the U.S. unleashed Agent Orange in its own backyard

Published on July 26, 2021Written by The Daily Mail

When Carol Van Strum moved to Five Rivers, Oregon, in 1974, she thought she had found the perfect rural idyll. Surrounded by National Forest, her four young children could grow up close to nature. They loved fishing and playing by the river, fascinated by the little ‘dipper’ birds that sat on the rocks.

‘They knew everything that lived down there,’ she recalls. ‘There were beavers and otters in the river, and all the fish and herons and ospreys. So they just were part of that.’
Then one day the children fell sick, choking and gasping.
Down at the river, Carol found a scene of devastation — dead ducklings, crayfish and trout.
The cause seemed fairly obvious: a U.S. Forestry Service helicopter had been flying overhead the day before, spraying something over the land.
Nobody knew what it was but, ‘a lot of people assumed, “Well it’s the government doing it, it must be OK,” ’ says Carol. ‘We called the fire service and they said: “Oh no, it’s perfectly safe.” ’ But it wasn’t.
The chopper was spraying a herbicide known as 2,4,5-T — the highly toxic main ingredient of Agent Orange, the notorious chemical defoliant used to blanket swathes of South-East Asia during the Vietnam War.

The U.S. military had stopped using it in 1971 because of growing public health concerns — but here it was being used in the U.S.
Agent Orange was the most devastating and enduring blight inflicted on Vietnam during the conflict, believed to have caused death or serious injury to up to a million victims. Its most toxic element, a dioxin known as TCDD, would soon wreak havoc in sleepy Oregon.
The herbicide drifted on to the Van Strums’ land with disastrous effect. The family dog died and so did the garden.
And it wasn’t just the Van Strums who suffered. The miscarriage rate among local women shot up within a month: one would-be mother eventually had 14 miscarriages.
Hunters began to find deformed fish, water fowl and deer. Fawns were born with no eyes, goslings hatched with their feet facing backwards or with only one wing, frogs had six legs.
And, appalling as that sounds, there was a devastating human parallel — successive generations of Vietnamese children were being born with equally horrifying deformities, earning Agent Orange notoriety as the most destructive chemical used in the history of warfare.
The battle waged by Carol and another courageous woman campaigner, French-Vietnamese activist Tran To Nga, against the ‘herbicide from Hell’ and the industrial giants and governments responsible for its manufacture is revealed in a new American documentary, The People Vs. Agent Orange.
America’s mixed feelings about the Vietnam War might help to explain why Oregon’s Agent Orange scandal was never made into a thriller. It is certainly worthy of it, with menacing men in dark suits, phone-tapping, stolen evidence and signs of a monstrous cover-up.

Some believe a tragic fire that destroyed the Van Strums’ home in 1977 and killed all four of their children was an arson attack linked to the spraying protest. Carol, who almost committed suicide that night, still cannot talk about it on camera.
The Agent Orange nightmare began in South Vietnam in the early 1960s, where the U.S. military (copying Britain’s example in the earlier Malayan Emergency) started using the herbicide to destroy the enemy’s crops and remove jungle foliage that the North Vietnamese soldiers used as cover.
The agent, which could reduce huge trees to leafless skeletons, was 50 per cent composed of 2,4,5-T. This in turn contained the devastating dioxin TCDD.
Dioxins persist for a very long time in animals and have been described as ‘wreaking havoc’ on the human genome. They can cause chromosomal mutations leading to deformed babies, lethal cancers and other crippling ailments as traces of poison pass through generations.
A dioxin molecule has a half-life of two billion years, making it about as lethal as the plutonium in nuclear bombs. Environmental protection agencies consider dioxins one of the planet’s most hazardous pollutants.
Some 18 million gallons of the herbicide were sprayed on Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia in America’s Operation Ranch Hand, from 1962 to 1971. It was used heavily around U.S. camps and bases to remove foliage where enemy snipers could hide.
The U.S. companies that made it — principally Dow Chemical and Monsanto — have argued that there is insufficient evidence to prove Agent Orange was responsible for what has been alleged. (Although in 1984, seven chemical companies paid out $180 million — £131 million — to help persuade U.S. veterans to drop claims against them.)
The companies have also claimed they can’t be held responsible for the uses to which Washington put their product.
Their critics — including Dr James Clary, a retired U.S. Air Force scientist who was involved in Operation Ranch Hand — insist that both the U.S. and the chemical companies always knew Agent Orange was ‘extremely harmful’ to people but refused to dilute the dioxin content (the cheaply produced military version had more concentrated dioxin than the expensive civilian one).
The U.S. military stopped dropping Agent Orange on South-East Asia in 1971, under pressure from scientists who disputed the claim that it only damaged plants.
But vast reserves of it, in barrels identified by orange bands around them, remained.

Its use on U.S. forests and land considered ‘remote from sustained human contact’ continued to be allowed.
In the heavily forested hills and mountains of west Oregon, an array of toxic herbicides arrived with perfect bad timing.
The local logging industry used a controversial process called ‘clear-cutting’, in which tracts of forest were cleared of trees so new timber could be grown.
Much of the land wasn’t replanted, and instead turned into vast areas of brushwood. In the early 1970s, a new U.S. law banned clear-cutting unless the land was replanted within three years.
Suddenly, logging companies needed to clear areas of brush very quickly. The chemicals used in Agent Orange must have seemed the perfect solution — until they were washed into the water supply.
Local people soon realised there was something terribly wrong.
A doctor recalls seeing a rise in birth defects, including ultra-rare conditions, such as babies born with parts of their brain and skull missing.
Led by Carol Van Strum and her late husband Steve, locals set up Citizens Against Toxic Sprays (CATS) and took legal action.
The chemical and logging companies hit back with studies concluding that the chemicals were harmless, dismissing their opponents as tree-hugging zealots. A senior Dow company scientist claimed 2,4,5-T was ‘about as toxic as aspirin’.
Outside the courtroom, their tactics got much dirtier, say the protesters. A health study that an activist had meticulously compiled mysteriously went missing after her home was burgled. When protesters went to deliver evidence to officials in a nearby city, they were ‘followed by a shiny sedan with guys in suits’.
Two men in suits also visited Dr Renee Stringham, who had sounded the alarm about birth defects, saying they wanted to talk about the herbicides: ‘They didn’t really say where they were from. When they said: “Do you know at all times where your children are?”, I realised I didn’t. I said it was time to end the interview, as it was clearly a threat against me and my children.’
A van with tinted windows turned up outside the Van Strums’ house, the men inside it sidling up to the children to ask about the ‘deformed critters’ they kept in the freezer. As the van left, the back door flew open, revealing a bank of video cameras inside.
‘The phone company’s employees told us our phones were being tapped,’ says Carol. Her husband was followed as he drove along deserted country roads.
They never worked out whether it was the government, the loggers or the chemicals companies.
When they won a temporary injunction stopping the spraying of 2,4,5-T, the amateur activists were flooded with appeals for help from people across the U.S. reporting similar issues.
A study in Idaho, for instance, showed that the sperm of men working with herbicides became deformed after the spraying season.
Protesters in other parts of the U.S. even shot at spraying helicopters. The new documentary has footage, secretly shot by one of the pilots as recently as 2015, in which he finishes his shift red-faced and coughing up blood.
On December 31, 1977, Carol arrived home to find her house in flames. Her four children, aged five to 13, perished inside.
Police said the fire was ‘accidental in nature with the actual cause unknown’ but Carol, now 79, insists that firefighters told her it was arson.
‘It’s hard to talk about it. I just can’t, really,’ she says. But she makes clear that she believes her opponents in the spraying row were responsible.
‘They had done absolutely the worst thing anybody could do to me,’ she tells the programme. As her children had also campaigned against spraying, she reasoned, ‘the only thing to do was to keep going for their sake’.
The U.S. government severely restricted the use of 2,4,5-T in 1979, after the Oregon protest, and a few years later firms stopped selling it.
While helicopters no longer clatter overhead spraying 2,4,5-T, they still use the other herbicide in Agent Orange, a chemical called 2,4-D. It doesn’t contain dioxin but its safety is fiercely debated.
U.S. politicians and judges have dragged their feet over making reparations to Vietnam, apparently afraid of opening the floodgates.
Tran To Nga, the documentary’s other warrior mother, would love to change that. Working as a journalist aligned with anti-U.S. forces during the Vietnam War, she remembers Agent Orange as a ‘sticky powder’ that ‘drenched’ her body and made her cough uncontrollably.
She and her friends consumed water and food contaminated by it for months, and its terrible legacy revealed itself when she had her first child, a daughter, in 1968.
Everyone marvelled at the baby’s beauty until, after a few days, her skin ‘started to come off in pieces’.
She developed breathing and heart problems, then died.
Tran’s other two children survived but, like their own children, have suffered from incurable diseases such as blood and pancreatic disorders.
Tran blamed herself for 40 years until she found out Agent Orange had been responsible and that she still has dioxin in her body.
Now 79, she has diabetes, cancer and a rare insulin allergy, all probably caused by the defoliant.
She may not live to fulfil her pledge to appeal against a French court ruling in May that rejected her lawsuit against 14 chemical companies.
Meanwhile, dioxin from Agent Orange is contaminating the environment at scores of sites around the world, from the Netherlands to Japan, where the herbicides were produced, tested, shipped and eventually dumped.
In Britain, campaigners say biodiversity is being damaged by herbicides and insecticides used by farmers. In countries such as Brazil, Argentina and the U.S., there are far less rigorous controls on chemicals.
Agent Orange, according to Tran, is the mother of them all, though. ‘If we allow it to be forgotten, the tragedy of pesticides will continue,’ she says.
And whether we mean Vietnam or Oregon, no one has been made properly accountable.
See more here:
Header image: Progressive International
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

MIT Researchers Infiltrate Anti-Maskers And Are Stunned To Discover They Do SCIENCE

You can’t make this stuff up. You really can’t. Someone sent me a link from an article at “Life Site News” that left me not knowing whether to laugh, cry or both. MIT researchers infiltrate ‘anti-maskers,’ but find they ‘practice a form of data literacy in spades’ ‘Far from ignoring scientific evidence to argue for … Read more