WATCH: Pfizer Executive Runs Away From Questions About Testing COVID Vaccine on Cells From Aborted Baby

Pfizer Senior Director of Worldwide Research Vanessa Gelman RUNS from Veritas' Questions. I’m WEAK — alyssamariiee (@alyssadehen) October 14, 2021 Confronted by a Project Veritas reporter, a Pfizer executive literally ran away when asked about the connection between her company’s COVID-19 vaccine and abortion. In a video published Thursday , Project Veritas journalist James […]
The post WATCH: Pfizer Executive Runs Away From Questions About Testing COVID Vaccine on Cells From Aborted Baby appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes.

Vaxxer Regime Has a Real Problem Denying Natural Immunity

Editor’s Commentary: One of the biggest fallacies I fall for on a regular basis is one I’m sure many of our readers fall for as well. We see so much coverage of certain topics on sites we regularly visit that we assume the information is common knowledge. Invariably, I come across people in my travels […]
The post Vaxxer Regime Has a Real Problem Denying Natural Immunity appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes.

The Manipulators: Frank Luntz and Far-Left Group Wage Disinformation Campaign for COVID Tyranny

A shadowy far-left “public health” organization and TV “pollster” Frank Luntz have teamed up to run a full court press COVID-19 disinformation campaign, with the goal of persuading governments on all levels to further mandate tyranny on the masses, while attempting to convince American citizens of the necessity of these orders. Since the beginning of […]
The post The Manipulators: Frank Luntz and Far-Left Group Wage Disinformation Campaign for COVID Tyranny appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes.

Breaking: U.S. Dept. of Defense Data Shatters Official COVID Narrative!

Published on October 14, 2021Written by

AI-powered DoD data analysis program named “Project Salus” shatters official vaccine narrative, shows A.D.E. accelerating in the fully vaccinated with each passing week.

The alarming findings show that the vast majority of covid hospitalizations are occurring among fully-vaccinated individuals and that outcomes among the fully vaccinated are growing worse with each passing week. This appears to fit the pattern of so-called Antibody Dependent Enhancement, where the treatment intervention (mRNA vaccines) is worsening health outcomes and leading to excess hospitalizations and deaths.
These data, presented here, shatter the official Biden / Fauci narrative that falsely claims America is experiencing, “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” The data show that the pandemic actually appears to be accelerated by covid-19 vaccines, while unvaccinated individuals are having far better outcomes than the vaccinated.
Furthermore, according to these data (shown below), the single best strategy for avoid post-vaccine infections and hospitalizations is natural immunity derived from a previous covid infection.
The full analysis is entitled, “Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against the Delta variant among 5.6M Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older” and is dated Sep. 28, 2021. The presentation of these data consists of 17 slides, which are available at the Humetric website in slide form, also posted on Natural News servers in this PDF versionwhich is more convenient for viewing and printing.
From the JAIC Project Salus document:
In this 80 percent vaccinated 65+ population, an estimated 60 percent of COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in fully vaccinated individuals in the week ending August 7th.

By August 21st, 71 percent of covid-19 “cases” were occurring among fully vaccinated individuals:
In this 80 percent vaccinated 65+ population, an estimated 71 percent of COVID-19 cases occurred in fully vaccinated individuals.

These data reveal that as the Delta variant approached a 97% infection rate, “cases” and hospitalizations among fully vaccinated individuals showed striking increases with each passing week.
Key findings of the DoD / JAIC / Project Salus / Humetrix analysis
Throughout the slides, “VE” refers to vaccine effectiveness. “Breakthrough” means a failed vaccine, where a fully vaccinated person is diagnosed with covid. Many of those people require hospitalization and ICU treatments (see the slides below).
Some of the key findings of the Project Salus analysis include:

The effectiveness of mRNA vaccines is confirmed to wane over time.
With each passing week, those vaccinated with mRNA vaccines show an increasedrisk of vaccine failure / covid infections requiring hospitalization. From the analysis: “Odds ratio increasing to 2.5 at 6 months post vaccination.”
Natural immunity works: A prior covid infection greatly reduces the odds of a vaccinated person needing hospitalization from a subsequent infection.

Vaccine failure dramatically worsens within 5-6 months after being vaccinated
One slide from the analysis reveals that so-called “breakthrough” infections — vaccine failures — increase with time, showing a near doubling of breakthrough infections among those vaccinated 5-6 months ago vs. those vaccinated only 3-4 months ago.
These data end at August 21st, 2021 but the trend does not appear to be flattening. As more data are added to this analysis each week, it seems almost certain that breakthrough infections rates will continue to rise over time in vaccinated individuals. We do not yet know what will happen in 9 months after vaccination, but these data show cause for serious concern.

The following chart reveals that both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are showing the same pattern of worsening “breakthrough” infection rates over time. Notice the upward trend of all the bars in this chart, meaning both mRNA vaccines are producing the same increase in infections among the fully vaccinated:

Once the Delta variant took hold, 71 percent of COVID-19 “breakthrough” cases occurred among the fully vaccinated
As the following chart shows, 71 percent of COVID-19 “cases” were breakthrough cases (vaccine failures) once the Delta variant reached 90 percent spread across those infected.
Understand that the authors of this document state that those who are jabbed are not considered “vaccinated” until two weeks after they received the injections, which means that infections, hospitalizations and deaths which occurred from 0 – 14 days are ignored in this data set.
In reality, that means the percentage of “fully vaccinated” people responsible for breakthrough infections, hospitalizations and deaths is substantially higher than what is shown in these data. If they are claiming a 71 percent rate, it may in reality be more like 80 percent or even 90 percent, but we don’t know for sure because they are hiding all negative health outcomes for the first two weeks after the vaccines are administered (by claiming those people are “unvaccinated,” which is a deliberate deception being used to try to hide the harmful effects of vaccines).

Ethnic groups hit hardest: Native Americans, Hispanics and Blacks
Finally, a horrifying slide in the data set reveals that one of the highest risk factors for being hospitalized after being vaccinated is simply being of Native American descent. According to the data in this slide, Native Americans face around 50 percent higher odds of being hospitalized after being vaccinated, compared to other ethnic groups such as Whites.
Hispanics face a slightly lower risk which appears to be around 40 percent higher odds. Blacks face around 25 percent higher odds.
Why is this the case? The gain-of-function properties which were engineered into the SARS-CoV-2 biological weapon — via Fauci, Daszak and the NIH — target ACE2 receptors which exist in higher densities in targeted organ systems of many minority groups such as Native Americans, Hispanics and Blacks.
This has led many observers to conclude that the covid spike protein — which is generated in the bodies of those who take mRNA vaccines — is a race-specific bioweapon designed to achieve depopulation of minority groups.
Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, has engaged in many efforts to bring this to the attention of his followers, for example. These data provided by the DoD / JAIC / Project Salus document shown here appear to support the plausibility of such theories.
Other factors that greatly increase a person’s odds of being hospitalized after receiving vaccinations include kidney failure (ESRD), morbid obesity, chronic liver disease or receiving chemotherapy.

Natural immunity offers documented protect against future hospitalization
Finally, the data presented in this document shows that natural immunity — listed as “prior covid-19” substantially decreases the risk of hospitalization after receiving covid-19 vaccines. (See slide above.)
What this means is that the best way to ensure the safest outcome of a covid vaccine is to experience a covid infection before getting vaccinated. This dramatically reduces your risk of negative health outcomes.
Then again, if someone has already had covid, why would they need a vaccine in the first place? If anything, these data show that anyone choosing to receive covid-19 vaccines is making the wrong choice if they desire to avoid infections, hospitalizations or deaths.
Natural immunity, once again, is revealed as the most effective status that reduces negative outcomes.
In conclusion, these data from the DoD / JAIC absolutely shatter the false narrative of Biden, Fauci, Walensky and other “authorities” who are still attempting to gaslight the American people into thinking that hospitals are filled with unvaccinated people. In reality, the vast majority of hospitalizations and deaths are occurring among those who were fully vaccinated, according to the 5.6 million people studied in this particular data set (Medicare).
Importantly, post-vaccine health outcomes are worsening over time, meaning that the vaccines appear to be gradually damaging the immune system over subsequent months, making vaccinated individuals far more vulnerable to subsequent infections.
This is the very definition of ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement), about which many analysts such as Dr. Sherri Tenpenny have warned. Now, it appears that ADE is no longer merely a theory but rather a confirmed phenomenon reflected in official Medicare data.
Attorney Thomas Renz told Natural News today that these data should immediately result in not just the FDA’s revocation of mRNA vaccine EUA and approval status, but that the FDA, Fauci and Big Pharma’s top executives should be sued under RICO Act violations for racketeering and organized crime.
See more here:
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 


Trackback from your site.

Full Facts & Figures from Doctors & Scientists On COVID19

Published on October 14, 2021Written by

Scientists and Doctors Warn Against Investigational EUA COVID-19 Vaccines

Introduction (See below for doctors & scientists’ messages.)
Doctors for COVID Ethics Letters to Health Agencies.  Scientists have found the synthetic spike proteins in COVID vaccines are more dangerous than in naturally-occurring SARS-COV-2 infections to susceptible persons because:

COVID-19 victims die from cytokine storms when the body’s immune system attacks the body’s organs.  Vaccines can cause antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), a quicker cytokine storm, i.e., more severe illness, when a vaccinated person is next exposed to a wild virus. Prior attempts to develop coronavirus vaccines killed test animals or made them severely ill when subsequently encountering the wild virus. ADE occurs more in elderly or high-risk persons, in persons who had previous influenza vaccines or previously recovered from a SARS-COV-2 infection. Informed consent requires disclosing ADE risk;
mRNA and the vector COVID vaccines are “leaky ” i.e., do not stop infection or transmission.  In a Geert Bossche warned of deaths from mass corona vaccinations (Epoch Times March 2021) because leaky vaccines cause immune escape — the mutation and spread of more infectious viral variants.  In May, world-reknowned Nobel laureate virologist Luc Montagnier warned COVID vaccination is creating new variants. Vaccinated persons become spreaders of more infectious mutations of SARS-COV-2.  The more people vaccinated, the higher the risk of evolving strains.  There is evidence of vaccinated spreaders and an increase in serious COVID cases among the young, e.g. in Israel. “Break-through” cases are occurring in fully vaccinated people worldwide. E.g., Florida;
The lipid nano-particles (LNP)s cause human cells to manufacture synthetic spike proteins throughout the body that are more pathogentic than the original SARS-COV-2 spike protein, quickly spreading in greater numbers inside the body than a natural infection; causing, often, a large bump in excess mortality concomidant with vaccination rollouts.  The spike protein may invade brain tissue, infecting neurons and causing neurotropism.  The S1 sub-unit of the spike protein enters the parenchymal tissue of the brain in murine models. The brain’s endothelial cells attempt to hide the spike protein in the brain capillary glycocalyx, which can lead to degradation of the glycocalyx, dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and cerebral edema. (citation);
The polyethylene glycol, PEG, encasing the lipid nano-particles in the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, causes severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis in some persons;
Risks of blood coagulation and clotting (thrombosis) or Covid vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, or VITT is caused by synthetic spike proteins growing in the lungs, heart, ovaries, brain, liver, kidneys, bone marrow, testes, and other organs  disabling the body’s ACE-2 receptors…  The spike proteins bind to endothelial cells lining blood vessels. … causing platelets to clot in a majority of vaccine recipients… and may cause bleeding disorders …and heart problems. … and … cause neurological damage and clots in the brain. (citation). Doctors have reported seeing rapid development of advanced cancers occurring post-Covid vaccination in liver, lungs, and bones.
The Covid mRNA and DNA vaccines do not provide mucosal immunity that  would prevent infection and spread of COVID disease.  (see Mucosal Immunity in COVID-19: A Neglected but Critical Aspect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection  by Michael W. Russell, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States, Zina Moldoveanu, Pearay L. Ogra, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States and Jiri Mestecky, Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States  30 November 2020 | )   The mucosal immune system is the largest component of the human immune system, … providing protection at the main sites of infectious threat: the mucosael barriers. As SARS-CoV-2 initially infects the upper respiratory tract, its first interactions with the immune system is predominantly at respiratory mucosal surfaces…

Some doctors recommend isolating for up to 30 days after a COVID injection to avoid harming others while shedding pathogenic spike proteins; to avoid getting a SARS-COV-2 infection during first two weeks post-vaccination when the immune system is vulnerable; and, to take preventative measures.  See  COVID “vaccine” adverse events.
What Doctors & Scientists are Saying

“We knew these vaccines would kill people.”
By lying about safe remedies like Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine,, governments have committed “mass murder.”
“Don’t be afraid of COVID or ‘variants.’ Be terrified of your government.”
“These are not ‘slip-ups’, ‘well-intentioned mistakes’…They’re deliberately misleading.”

The COVID shot vs. Alternative Treatment. October 11, 2021. Dr. Zelenko is a board-certified family physician with over 20 years of experience. He is published in top peer reviewed journals with world renowned physicians. He’s the first in the world to develop therapeutics against COVID. He has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize and has been recognized as a hero at a Department of Homeland Security committee hearing.
Geert V. Bossche: Keep Asking the Wrong Questions and We’ll Never Tame this Pandemic  October 10, 2021.
Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? Oct 7, 2021. Ronald N.Kostoffa, Daniela Calinab, Darja Kanducc, Michael B.Briggs, Panayiotis Vlachoyiannopoulose, Andrey A. Svistunovf, Aristidis Tsatsakisg  A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.
audio podcast: Covid Vaccine & Kids part 2: with Dr. Paul Alexander. October 7, 2021.
‘We’re in the middle of a major biological catastrophe’: COVID expert Dr. Peter McCullough. October 6, 2021. In a recent lecture, Dr. Peter McCullough presented alarming data related to COVID vaccines, the fraud of national health authorities, the ‘Therapeutic Nihilism’ being exercised in hospitals, and the urgent necessity of active resistance.    There is no data safety monitoring board (DSM) overseeing this COVID vaccine rollout.
Israeli Data Favor Higher Estimates of Post-Vax Myocarditis — Results echo the controversial VAERS study from September MedPage Today October 6, 2021. For patients in Israel’s largest healthcare system, Clalit Health Services, the estimate of myocarditis was 2.13 cases per 100,000 vaccinated persons, reaching as high as 10.69 cases per 100,000 in men and boys ages 16 to 29.
The unforgivable sin! G. Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD October 2021 … “As the mechanism of immune defense in vaccinees is totally different from the one at play in unvaccinated individuals, the mantra of mass vaccination stakeholders that vaccination of youngsters and children will provide them with improved protection from contracting severe disease is a textbook example of scientific nonsense.
Their irrational, erroneous extrapolations lead people to believe that they should get their children vaccinated whereas there is barely any more catastrophic immune intervention one could think of.  …  healthy children and youngsters are NOT ‘naturally’ susceptible to any Sars-CoV-2 lineage but exclusively acquire such susceptibility as a direct consequence of functional suppression of their well-established innate immune capacity due to a rapid re-exposure event or, even much worse and long-lived, due to vaccination.
The likelihood of rapid re-exposure to Sars-CoV-2 after previous infection dramatically increases when highly infectious variants expand in prevalence. Such an expansion in prevalence directly results from mass vaccination campaigns as mass vaccination turns vaccinees into an excellent breeding ground for naturally selected S-directed immune escape variants.”
10/05/21.  Pro-vax John Campell, Ph.D. says COVID Vaccines Are Being Administered Incorrectly, Expert Tells Jimmy Dore  Incorrect injection techniques being recommended by the CDC, WHO and vaccine manufacturers are increasing post-vaccine blood clotting and damages to the brain, lungs, and heart.  Other videos: Inadvertant intravenous injections and  Aspiration, more information        See these two papers:

Intravenous Injection of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA Vaccine Can Induce Acute Myopericarditis in Mouse Model. August 18, 2021. Can Li, Yanxia Chen, Yan Zhao, David Christopher Lung, Zhanhong Ye, Wenchen Song, Fei-Fei Liu, Jian-Piao Cai, Wan-Man Wong, Cyril Chik-Yan Yip  The histological changes of myopericarditis after the first IV-priming dose persisted for 2 weeks and were markedly aggravated by a second IM- or IV-booster dose. … Conclusions:  This study provided in vivo evidence that inadvertent intravenous injection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines may induce myopericarditis. Brief withdrawal of syringe plunger to exclude blood aspiration may be one possible way to reduce such risk. And see this study: 
Thrombocytopenia and splenic platelet directed immune responses after intravenous ChAdOx1 nCov-19 administration. June 29, 2021 Leo Nicolai, View ORCID ProfileAlexander Leunig, Kami Pekayvaz, Afra Anjum, Eva Riedlinger, Luke Eivers, Marie-Louise Hoffknecht, Dario Rossaro, Raphael Escaig, Rainer Kaiser, Vivien Polewka, Anna Titova, Karsten Spiekermann, Matteo Iannacone, Konstantin Stark, Steffen Massberg.  doi:

Dr. Richard Fleming, MD, PhD, JD, who has studied spike proteins in his research since the 1990’s and explains beginning at the 2:14:30 mark how the harm is done and will continue to worsen.   October 2, 2021.  The first part of Dr. Fleming’s talk begins at roughly the 1:25:30 mark and explains how these mRNA gene technologies work, as well as the misleading statistics that were used in the media propaganda to promote the gene technology injections to the public, fooling even medical doctors who are too busy to delve into the details of the statistical analyses.
My Jaw DROPPED when I Tested Someone’s Immune System After the 2nd mRNA Jab.  By Dr. Nathan Thompson What does the mRNA COVID vaccine do to the human immune system? Sep 28, 2021.
Vaccine Immune Interations and the Booster Shots By Doctors for COVID Ethics. How and why Covid-19 vaccines incite immunological attack on blood vessel walls.  By now, most people know COVID-19 vaccines can cause blood clotting and bleeding. Some readers may be aware that reports of death following COVID-19 vaccination outnumber those for all vaccines combined since records began, 31 years ago, in the official US database VAERS. Eminent independent scientists and researchers in the fields of immunology and microbiology have been writing to medical regulators since early 2021 [3], warning of vaccine-related blood clotting and bleeding, including that the official data on blood abnormalities post-vaccination likely represent “just the tip of a huge iceberg”
A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products JessicaRose PhD, MSc, BSc1. Peter A.McCulloughMD, MPH1 October 1, 2021. Myocarditis rates reported in VAERS were significantly higher in youths between the ages of 13 to 23 (p

Top Doctors, Among Which Dr. Peter McCullough Sue The FDA For Pfizer Vaccine Data

Highly educated and prominent doctors, among which Dr. Peter McCullough’s name steps out, filed a lawsuit against the Food and Drugs Administration, seeking to obtain the data ‘relied upon by the FDA to license the Pfizer Vaccine.’
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here:
The lawsuit was filed on September 16, in the United States Court North District of Texas, by the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT).
The reason for seeking this data to be public is because the FDA allegedly approved the experimental, abortion-tainted COVID-19 Pfizer jab, over data that doesn’t exist!
“The medical and scientific community and the public have a substantial interest in reviewing the data and information underlying the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer Vaccine,” reads the suit.
“Reviewing this information will settle the ongoing public debate regarding the adequacy of the FDA’s review process,” adds the suit. “Releasing this data should also confirm the FDA’s conclusion that the Pfizer Vaccine is safe and effective and, thus, increase confidence in the Pfizer Vaccine.”

Censuring the FDA’s line of reasoning, the group’s lawyer Aaron Siri penned an article that states, “Transparency demands the FDA immediately disclose the data it relied upon to license the Pfizer vaccine. Not tomorrow. Today.”
“Scientists, health care professionals, and every person in this country, especially those mandated to receive this product, should have access to the data now,” he added.
Hammering at the importance of the FDA releasing the information, Siri reminds people that while the federal government “has mandated Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine for millions of Americans” they have given “Pfizer complete financial immunity for harms caused by this product.”
“So, you can’t say no, you can’t sue for harm, and you can’t see the data underlying the government’s claim that the product is safe and effective,” Siri wrote.
“Some might describe such conduct as authoritarian. Of course, such a claim would likely get censored,” he concluded.

Pfizer’s Nervousness About Its COVID Vaccine’s Origins Conceals a Horror Story

That story, mostly unknown until now, should at an absolute minimum require the approval of any employee’s request for conscience-based religious exemptions from employer or government vaccination mandates. On October 6, with the help of James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas (PV), a whistleblower at Pfizer revealed , in leaked internal emails, that company executives have been, […]
The post Pfizer’s Nervousness About Its COVID Vaccine’s Origins Conceals a Horror Story appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes.

Against the ‘Nanny State’: An Interview with Dr. Robert Malone

That is a fundamentally authoritarian position, but it’s also not grounded in solid science. We have a situation of imperfect vaccines. Of course, we rarely, if ever, have a perfect vaccine, but these are especially imperfect. They don’t provide us with very robust protection against infection, they don’t provide us with very robust protection against virus replication, and they don’t protect us from virus-shredding or spreading it to others.So, the argument that one must get vaccinated in order to prevent further spreading is not valid. It doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
There is much we still don’t know. But we absolutely do know that vaccinated persons who are infected can infect others. What we have here is a ‘noble lie.’ This concept comes from Plato: in politics, those in positions of authority may find it acceptable to speak untruths—lies—to the public for the sake of the common good.
The public have been told that if they all accept vaccination, herd immunity will be achieved, in which the virus will stop spreading, society can get back to normal, we can fix the economy, stop the lock-downs, end all threat of this virus … but only if everyone accepts the vaccine.
The problem with that logic is exposed by the Delta variant, with a baseline replication coefficient of between 5 and 8, whereas the Alpha strains were more in the 2 to 3 range. With the current vaccines that offer protection from infection at an efficiency of between 40 and 60 percent, we numerically cannot achieve herd immunity.
So, we are currently in a situation in which governments are pressurising their populations into accepting unknown risks for the sake of something that is not achievable.
Now, there’s a further problem with the logic of universal vaccination, and that is the problem that what we are in fact doing is virus-selecting through evolution. We are selecting for viruses to become more resistant to vaccines.
And there’s a problem that’s even worse. In certain veterinary models, there’s a chicken disease called Marek’s disease; if you vaccinate a flock of chickens as this virus is moving through their population, you can actively generate more highly pathogenic viruses that are far more infectious.
There are multiple examples that indicate that we are developing viruses in the human population that are derived from the Alpha strain; these new Delta strains, and others, are escaping the effects of the vaccine. This is likely to continue and become much worse if we have universal vaccination.
My argument, that I recently conveyed to Steve [Bannon]—and that Peter Navarro and I have put out in editorials—is that a more rational strategy (and more ethical and equitable) would be that of administering vaccines to those at highest risks, for whom it’s clear, despite adverse effects associated with the vaccine, the risks of death and disease from the virus are higher. Use the vaccine for those people.
For the majority of the population, use early drug interventions, so that they can develop natural immunity. We can protect people from hospitalisation, and all the costs and burdens associated with that, by providing means of early detection—self-diagnosis or home-diagnosis—with apps or computer-based tools that help people to assess their own personal risk.

Now that we’re moving towards vaccinating kids, we seem to be doing the very opposite of the strategy that you recommend.

The vaccination of kids is difficult to justify, in my opinion. Just speaking from the American data, since the beginning of the outbreak, we have had fewer than 400 deaths attributed to this virus among children. (In comparison, on average, we lose around 600 children a year from influenza.) Of those U.S. children—that is up to the age of 18—almost every one of them had a major pre-existing medical condition.
So, the average risk of death for children up to age 18 from COVID-19 in the United States is around 2 per million or even less, but the risks for a healthy child are even less than that. But the risk of the vaccine—this is important to understand—the one risk that we know, it is clear, is the risk of heart damage.
Particularly in young males, the risk of the vaccine for heart damage is significantly greater than the risk of death from the virus.
I hear people say, “we have to vaccinate children to protect the elderly.” But the elderly can be protected by accepting the vaccine. People do not realise that by trying to vaccinate the whole world, we create the enormous risk of generating escape mutant viruses that are completely resistant to any vaccine, because the vaccines we have are very narrow vaccines, only to one antigen.
Herd immunity is the protection afforded by natural immunity and is up to twenty times better in terms of protection from disease, than anything the vaccine can give us. If we pursue universal vaccination, we are reasonably likely to generate viruses that will overcome the vaccine protection in the very people who need it most, namely the elderly, the obese, and the immuno-compromised.
One of the chief tools that we have to protect those who are at high risk is this vaccine, imperfect as it is, and we’re throwing it away due to this naïve belief that we can achieve herd immunity, and get back to normal, if only everybody would take the vaccine. The data show that this cannot be achieved with these products.

My own organisation, Patriot Party Italia, recently put out a statement saying that Italy’s funding of the World Health Organisation (WHO) should be suspended until an independent investigation has looked into the WHO’s response to the COVID virus, specifically with regard to the WHO’s protection of China’s national interests. Is that a proposal that you think is feasible?

Suspending funding for the WHO? So here’s the problem. A similar argument could be made for other health organisations, even national public ones. They’ve been compromised by pharmaceutical interests—we use the term regulatory capture. What you’re talking about, though, is a different type of capture.
There are many that argue that the WHO has been captured and compromised by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and their financial interests. Bill Gates has spoken about how he has had over a twentyfold return on his vaccine company investments.
So, Gates, who has major investments in Moderna, Pfizer, etc., is not losing money on this pandemic, but rather making money on this pandemic. And he’s a major funder of the WHO. I think many people are now coming around to seeing that the WHO, as it currently exists, is not serving global interests effectively. And it has been compromised by other interests.
The question is, what do you do about it? An alternative response is, in my opinion, that a parallel organisation of sufficient robustness needs to be established, before we cease to fund the existing one. To stop funding, in the face of a pandemic, of the WHO, despite its many limitations, would be counterproductive.
Many are saying that there are different organisations trying to do this right now, and what’s needed is to build a parallel structure, mature it to the point that it can accept the responsibilities that have been vesting with WHO, and then migrate to this new structure that might provide a better service to the world and be less compromised by national or special interests.

In a new organisation, wouldn’t the regulatory capture start all over again?

That is the nature of human beings. They will attempt to exert their influence. In any case, I believe that an abrupt disbanding of the WHO, despite its limitations, in the face of a pandemic, would not serve the interests of the global community very well. The appointment of a new director could be a reasonable interim step while an alternative structure is developed.
The problem with building an alternative structure, of course, is who is going to do it? For instance, there were those who hoped that the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) would mature into something like that, but many think that CEPI has already been compromised.
There is an initiative, I hear, in the Rockefeller Foundation to try to do something like this; but the Rockefeller Foundation has its own financial interests. So, there are these operational practicalities of how to establish a foundation that reflects equitable, global interests, as opposed to more national or financial interests, whether it’s the World Economic Forum, or BlackRock Capital, or whatever.

That’s the fundamental tension that we have now as a world community, how do we come to terms with the fact that so much of global capital is controlled by a very, very small number of individuals. I think that is the fundamental tension of our world today.

Finally, Dr. Malone, how can people follow you and continue to benefit from your insights?

I have yet to be de-platformed from Twitter. So that’s @rwmalonemd. I have set up a Gab account, as a backup. I have a LinkedIn account, which is less useful these days, and we have our website: Also, there’s a new initiative being launched through a new portal which can be found at That is designed to support both video and text in a way that will be difficult or impossible for large media and data centres to compromise.
See more here:
Header image: Contagion Today
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Pfizer Official Confessed That Their Vaccine Isn’t FDA Approved! [WATCH]

Regarding the C-19 vaccine, there is a number of information thrown at the people, so they can’t understand a thing!
The Dems and Joe Biden still promote the mass vaccination, stating that it is safe for use and approved by the FDA.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here:
The reality is that the side effects overweight the benefits, but their number is still unknown. Because of this, the FDA can’t approve the vaccine.
Recently, Senator Ron Johnson claimed that the U.S. doesn’t have an FDA-approved vaccine because the Pfizer vaccine doesn’t have the approval.
He said: “We do not have an FDA-approved vaccine being administered in the U.S. The FDA played a bait and switch. They approved the Comirnaty version of Pfizer drugs. It’s not available in the U.S. They even admit it. I sent them a letter three days later going “What are you doing?” What they did is they extended the emergency use authorization for the Pfizer drug vaccine that’s available in the U.S. Here that’s more than 30 days later, they haven’t asked that very simple question. If you’re saying that the Pfizer drug is the same as the Comirnaty, why didn’t you provide FDA approval on that? So, there’s not an FDA-approved drug, and, of course, they announced it so they could push through these mandates so that people actually think, “Oh, OK, now these things are FDA approved.” They are not, and again, maybe they should be, but the FDA isn’t telling me why.”

His claim was shocking, and the liberals didn’t know how to bury it. The White House promoted the massive vaccination even more. However, now Jennifer Bridges, a registered nurse fired due to the vaccine mandated, called Pfizer to confirm their FDA approval.


Red Voice Media TV Gab