HEALTH WELLNESS

The Amazing Health Benefits Of Chlorine Dioxide Therapy

A hard look at the benefits of Chlorine Dioxide therapy - from the "establishment" perspective and that of the alternative health care community.

Chlorine dioxide therapy recently came across my radar as a potential treatment for all kinds of health issues.

I’ve written elsewhere of the benefits of vitamin C, selenium and magnesium chloride as an “antidote” of sorts to the Covid mRNA vaccines. And many of my readers are already aware of the benefits of Ivermectin and hydroxichloroquine in improving the outcomes of fighting Covid.

There are also some great natural foods like elderberry, shiitake/maitake mushrooms and supplements derived from them that are wonderful immune system boosters.

Had Covid? Concerned about effects from the vax? Been exposed to someone else with covid or who has been exposed to the vax? Concerned about shedding? See the review of "SPIKE SUPPORT," a supplement specifically optimized for dealing with the affects of the spike proteins that might be affecting your system.

But there is something that came across my radar lately – the benefits of chlorine dioxide therapy as a tool for treating many diseases. I’m not a medical professional, but based on what many of them have said, this is definitely worth a good look!

First, let’s be aware of all the warnings regarding “chlorine dioxide therapy” (of course…..)

I am not a doctor. Nor am I a medical professional of any kind.

I do research and I have opinions about health, healing and natural medicine. But as per any web site, I will say that I am NOT OFFERING MEDICAL ADVICE OF ANY KIND. 


ALWAYS consult with your doctor or health care professional before embarking on ANY course of treatment or therapy. I do not assume any liability for any results if you should choose to follow the advice you find here that I've uncovered from these medical professionals.


In the end, YOU are responsible for the actions you take and the medical choices you decide to pursue with the advice of YOUR health care provider.

Look. This is an alternative medicine therapy. And there is a lot of quackery out there. But then again, there are a lot of things that have been discouraged or even rejected outright by the mainstream western medicine world that work. (Consider the war on Ivermectin, in spite of the fact that the National Institute of Health has not one, but two different web pages dealing with Ivermectin and showing that it is, in fact, effective in treating Covid. Check HERE and HERE to see what I mean.

So pardon me if I’m skeptical of the current western medical establishment. But having said that, you need to know that the warnings about this therapy pretty much come down to one thing.

If you're into natural approaches to health, you should study NAD and NMN. These are building blocks your body uses to repair cell damage and maintain vitality.

They will tell you that chlorine dioxide is bleach. And bleach will kill you. So they say….

Examples of the warnings: From Web MD… “Be careful not to purchase chlorine dioxide supplement products. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has warned consumers not to use these products due to the risk for serious safety issues and death.”

From Health Desk… “its use can be dangerous to human health. The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has warned that risks of ingesting chlorine dioxide include: severe vomiting, severe diarrhea, low blood cell counts and low blood pressure due to dehydration, respiratory failure, changes to electrical activity in the heart that can lead to potentially fatal abnormal heart rhythms, and acute liver failure.”

Consider this video as representative of the standard "establishment" party line on this stuff.

This video comes from a Canadian television show. On issues like this, Canada and the US are very much in lockstep if you compare Health Canada philosophies and those of the FDA. And to be honest, there are some cautions in here you might want to consider if you're evaluating this as a potential treatment for something.

Mark Kelly on the Miracle Mineral Solution as seen on "The Fifth Estate."

But “they” also have NO CLUE why you (and I) are reluctant to take an mRNA vaccine. So opinions vary on the quality of “their” opinions.

I actually wrote a post about the video where Franklin Graham interviewed the head of the NIH about Covid vaccines and vaccine reluctance and the head of the National Institute of Health seriously seemed to have no clue why the “covid vaccine-hesitant” are vaccine hesitant.

They seem to have a very focused and in-depth frame of reference around part of the whole body of facts out there. And when it comes to alternative therapies and natural medicine, they don’t even seem to be able to wrap their heads around it.

Consider it an alternative worldview with disastrous consequences (since they hold most of the money and the power).

So just how much can chlorine dioxide do? Can it really even cure cancer?

I will make it clear: I am not a health care professional. I will only present information that I have found from others and you will have to decide what to do with this information and what, if anything, you may want to try or seek professional advice for. But having said that, there are some medical professionals who believe there is good reason to think that chlorine dioxide may, in fact, be very helpful in combating diseases as serious as certain kinds of cancers.

Consider, for example, this, from The Journal Of Cancer Treatment And Diagnosis.

A first patient with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas has decided, on his own, to refuse chemotherapy but to treat himself with lipoïc acid, hydroxycitrate combined with oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide. His blood tests and radiological examinations have almost normalized and the disease is stable at 18 months. Another patient with hormone resistant metastatic prostate cancer has experienced a sharp drop in PSA level as well as improved medical condition. From extensive literature review, the mechanism of action of chlorine dioxide is unknown. It is our hypothesis (albeit unproven) that chlorine dioxide results in tumor cell acidification of the alkaline pH of cancer cells.

From the abstract of an article on The Journal Of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

And Covid? Can it cure Covid?

Well, anecdotal evidence is a funny thing. Sometimes you can find what you’re looking for, even when it’s not there. And the “gold standard” always seems to be the “double blind study.” But sometimes, there’s not enough time for that with all the dying from a new disease and all.

But to give you an idea of what others have done with this stuff and the results they believe they’ve found from it, take a look at this video to understand what they did in Bolivia to deal with Covid by using this treatment, and the results they had.

The SCIENCE of chlorine dioxide as used in Bolivia

In the end, it seems if you stack up enough anecdotal evidence, it starts to look like it shows some statistical probabilities, if you know what I mean....

So what is chlorine dioxide and what can this therapy do for you?

Rather than reinventing the wheel, I’m linking here to a video series developed by someone who has done a deep dive into this therapy and what his findings are. I’m not a medical professional and so I don’t make medical recommendations.

But I sure think what this guy has to say is worth consideration. See if it makes sense to you.

As the author of the video says,

“In this video, I want to share my two year journey of discovery with you so that you can save yourself some time and effort. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t do your own research, but I am saying that I have done a significant amount of unbiased research, and I was willing to go either way with regard to accepting the claims of chlorine dioxide.”

from the intro to the video

First video: Getting Started

Next: The Universal Antidote Documentary - The SCIENCE of Chlorine Dioxide

USEFUL LINKS:

Here are some links provided by the person who sourced the video, above. Check them out and make your own judgement.

As I said, I'm not a medical professional and I don't give medical advice. But I do like to point to advice given by others so people can make their own judgements about them. Check the links below for more info....

Reference Guidebook [save/download/print]

Suppliers Worldwide [save/download/print]

1988 NASA Archive Article

● Telegram Channel: t.me/TheUniversalAntidote

● [US] Blog post regarding CO2: https://www.uncensoredstorm.com/co2

● Follow [US] on FB: https://www.facebook.com/uncensoredstorm

● [US] Patriot Merch & Blog: https://www.uncensoredstorm.com

Read More
HEALTH WELLNESS, SCIENCE AND TECH

How To Protect Yourself From Vaccinated People (And From The Vaccine)

Dr Bryan Ardis On How to Counteract the COVID Spike Protein and How To Protect Yourself From Vaccine Shedding

Please Note:

This post has become pretty popular, and for good reason. But I have to say it's a bit "outdated," because it was written primarily for those "prepping" because they knew they needed to get the vaccine.

If you've already gotten the shot, this post is still informative purposes.

But you'll want to go HERE to read about the best way to supplement if you've already had the shot and you're concerned about the best way to remove the spike proteins from your system.

How to detox from spike proteins.

Dr Bryan Ardis, CEO of Ardis Labs, discusses in this MAGA Institute podcast how, with natural vitamin and mineral supplements, we can protect ourselves from both SARS-CoV-2 itself and any spike proteins that may be transmitted by shedding from people who have taken the COVID-19 gene therapy injections.

This has never been about treating Covid. It's always been about the vaccine. Just look at how they've downplayed ivermectin and you'll see what I mean.

If you're here, it's probably because you see the value in natural approaches to health care.  If so, you might want to read this article on something called "chlorine dioxide" and "chlorine dioxide therapy."

Perhaps you've heard of "shedding."

So first of all, what is "shedding?"

According to Dr. Palevsky, in a video featured on "America's Frontline Doctors," there are some concerns regarding "viral shedding" and particularly more with this mRNA vaccine. In part, he says,

And so, what we’ve been seeing is a massive increase in those who’ve been given the injection of blood clotting problems, miscarriages, stillborns, infertility, stroke, heart attack, autoimmune diseases, and death, just to name a few, and that’s in those who been injected.  So certainly there should be a suspicion when you see people around the injected people who have not been injected getting the typical symptoms of COVID in addition to miscarriages, bleeding, irregular menstrual cycles; it should raise a very, very strong suspicion.

As featured in "Americas's Frontline Doctors"

Now, in all fairness, the typical response from the medical community is that "viral shedding" is impossible. But as many of us know, they seem to be lying to us about many things, such as the effectiveness of ivermectin, HCQ and the like, as well as underreporting the adverse reactions to the vaccine.

So you're going to have to decide who you are going to trust on this issue.

My experience to date, however, is that the "Florence NIghtengales" of the medical community keep raising red flags and expressing their reasons for concern with extreme detail and clarity; but the establishment seems to keep saying, "just shut up and ignore them."

The Florence Nightengales are always in the minority - at least in the beginning.

If you have to get the vaccine, this is how to protect yourself from its damaging effects, according to Dr. Ardis.

Dr. Ardis also discusses that we need to be kind, loving and understanding as we attempt to rescue people from the COVID-19 "cult."

You can visit Dr. Ardis' website here.

You can also download a report here from the MAGA Institute.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm into natural supplements. THIS ONE is high on my list.

THE RECIPE, according to Dr Bryan Ardis - vitamin C, magnesium and selenium

The report in the link above contains a whole bunch of documentation for these ingredients and how they are effective in dealing with the adverse effects of the virus and the vaccine.

But, in short, Dr Ardis recommends the following:

  • Selenium - supports the liver's ability to produce glutathione. You need 200 mcg (micrograms) per day.
  • Vitamin C - very specific dosing required. Work up to 10,000 mG of vitamin C per day. 5000 in the morning and 5000 in the evening. It is water soluble. Tests have proven that vitamin C can even protect animals in labs from contaminants like lead sulphate and radiation poisoning.
  • If you need to get the vaccine, take vitamin C 4 hours before you go. You need 500 mG per KG of body weight. (See my notes, below...)
  • You need magnesium - magnesium chloride, magnesium citrate or magnesium glycinate. 500 mG per day and work your way up to 1000 mG per day.
  • Magnesium stops calcium from saturating the cells and prevents disease.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go to flccc.net and americasfrontlinedoctors.org for information on how to protect yourself from potentially deadly results from being around people who have been injected with the Covid vaccines.

By the way, I've also written an article about pine needle tea and how it can apparently help protect you from "Covid shedding."

NOTE on the Vitamin C quantity

I did some calculating about the amount of vitamin C that Dr. Ardis recommends to take within 1 to 4 hours before you go for the vaccine. For a 200 pound man, that would be 45,000 mG of vitamin C!!!!!

That does sound really crazy to me. I will be honest. For instance, Dr. Axe, a doctor of chiropractic, certified doctor of natural medicine and clinical nutritionist suggests that taking more than 2,000 mG of vitamin C per day is overload.

However... As Dr. Axe himself says,

There’s some evidence that 200 milligrams per day is the maximum amount of vitamin C that human cells can absorb. However, according to the Linus Pauling Institute, “There is no reliable scientific evidence that doses of vitamin C up to 10 g/day (10,000 milligrams) in adults are toxic or detrimental to health.”

Dr. Axe regarding Vitamin C levels and toxicity

So, Does This Really Work?

I am not a doctor, nor am I a medical professional of any kind. And I want to be VERY careful here to state that I am NOT giving medical advice; I am merely passing along advice from certified medical professionals.

But, at the same time, I do want to share some anecdotal evidence and give you my personal feeling regarding what I myself would do if I find myself in a situation where I would need to be "V'd" with one of these things.

The Anectodal evidence

My wife and I were out at dinner in the summer. Our waitress felt the way we do about this vaccine. But she needed to get it for work - they were threatening that she would lose her job if not jabbed.

Her experience with the first one was typical - sore arm at the injection site, aches, mild fever and the like. She was fearful of the second shot as they tell you that the second one is the one that really kicks your butt.

So I told her about this article (I'm adding this part 4 months later) about 3 days before she went for the second shot. She started that night with the protocol - 10,000 per day vitamin C, the selenium and the magnesium chloride up until the vaccine. And she continued it for a few days after the vaccine. From what she told me, though, I don't believe she did the extra "kick" of that vitamin C overdose just before the shot.

Even without that quantum dose of C before the shot, it seems she did exceedingly well.

The first day after the vaccine, I asked her how she made out and she said,

"Thank you so much for the information the other night. I took all the vitamins starting that night and 24 hours after vaccine #2 I feel great! My arm isn't even sore this time!

I followed up with her two weeks later (which is how I know she continued it for a week after the shot) to see how she did. In part, what she said was,

"I'm doing amazing!!! I had NO side effects from the second shot. My arm didn't even hurt. I was able to pick up a shift at work the day after I got my shot. I can never thank you enough for the information you gave me from Dr. Ardis. I really believe that was the reason I did so well. I even shared the regimen with some friends and they did great as well!

What I plan to do if I ever have to get the poke

Anecdotal evidence is a funny thing, and we tend to put a lot of emphasis on it - more than the evidence of others, as it turns out.

Quite honestly, if I am ever in a situation where I have to get the thing stuck in me, I think I might bump it up a bit a couple hours before I am scheduled to get it - perhaps I will go with an extra 5,000 mG in addition to the 10,000 prep for the few days before and the week after.

Because, in all honesty, I think my reaction is much like many of my readers have commented: 90,000 mG sounds like a LOT of vitamin C - even for a lab rat.

But that's me. And I am neither a doctor nor the son of a doctor.

(But I am the father of a DARN GOOD nutrition counselor... though I'm probably biased.)

Anyway, you'll have to do some research regarding this quantum vitamin C dose and use your judgement and the advice of a professional.

Good luck. God speed. Avoid the jab. But if you can't, this formula is recommended by a doctor and it seems from the feedback I'm getting to be hitting the target!

CLICK HERE TO READ ABOUT CHLORINE DIOXIDE THERAPY

Enter your text here...

Read More
HEALTH WELLNESS

Why Flouride In Your Drinking Water Is Bad For You

Fluoride is promoted as good for your teeth. But is it? And is it good for the rest of you?.

The city in which i live has recently decided that it is, once again, putting fluoride in our water system in the name of “improving dental health in our children.” But is fluoride helpful or harmful? Consider the following list of studies and research papers to see what the experts have to say about fluoride.

Fluoride is a substance that is naturally occurring in our environment. But the concern is the amount of it we are subjected to. The concern is that adding a substance with this much of a hazardous effect

Consider these excerpts from the following journals, papers, studies and government websites and decide for yourself whether or not you should be filtering your water or drinking bottled water.

For instance, this from the NIH…. “Blood levels during lifelong consumption can harm heart, bone, brain, and even developing teeth enamel.”

Yes. Flouride is bad for you. Is there anything that is GOOD for your teeth? Take a look at this surprising approach to natural dental care. It works!

So, let’s look at the different types of findings, by category.

Excess fluoride lowers IQ

Of all the studies I’ve found, those documenting reduced IQ are the most prevalent. I will show quotes from several of them here, with listings of others for follow-up for reference for those who wish to dig in further.

An study NIH correlates high fluoride levels with lower IQ

This was a study from the National Institutes of Health to assess the IQ of school going children aged 10-12 years in villages of Mysore district, India with different fluoride levels.

From the study: “… significant relationships were found between water fluoride levels and Intelligence Quotient of school children (P < 0.05). In the high fluoride village, the proportion of children with IQ below 90, i.e. below average IQ was larger compared to normal and low fluoride village. Age, gender, parent education level and family income had no significant association with IQ.”

Conclusion: School children residing in area with higher than normal water fluoride level demonstrated more impaired development of intelligence when compared to school children residing in areas with normal and low water fluoride levels. Thus, children’s intelligence can be affected by high water fluoride levels.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26381633

A study from India correlates lower IQ in children with excessive exposure to fluoride.

The study is entitled, “A correlation between Serum Vitamin, Acetylcholinesterase Activity and IQ in Children with Excessive Endemic Fluoride exposure in Rajasthan, India.” This study documents the damage done by excessive exposure to fluoride as well as a consideration of how proper vitamin supplementation can mitigate some of the damage otherwise incurred from the fluoride.

The results of the present study may conclude that fluoride
exposure promote oxidative stress and alteration in trace metal
analysis. These alterations may induce pathophysiological
activities due to lack of proper drinking water source. High
fluoride content in the drinking water (bore well water) and
associated fluoride induced health problem among the children.

Microsoft Word – 2.ISCA-IRJMedS-2013-010

From a study of the IQ Levels of Four to Seven-year-old Children in High Fluoride Areas

The results show that a high fluoride intake has a clear influence on the IQ of preschool children, manifesting itself primarily as damage to performance intelligence. The study also indicates that the proportion of preschool children living in high fluoride areas that have retarded head development (based on measuring of the circumference) is significantly higher than the low fluoride control group, and that children with this developmental deficient demonstrate a lower IQ than children with normal head development.

A Study of the IQ Levels of Four to Seven-year-old Children in High Fluoride Areas | Request PDF (researchgate.net)

So many other studies show decreased IQ and cognitive function

It is an extensive list, though not an exhaustive one. But for more references, see the following:

Damage to the nervous system

Joint pain, numbness, scoliosis, sleep disorders

A comparative analysis of the results of multiple tests in patients with chronic industrial fluorosis

Nervous system symptoms and signs: Symptoms were present
in all 72 cases in Group A, with dizziness, weakness, degradation of
memory, sleep disorders, and joint pain
present in 72 cases (100%),
headaches in 60 cases (83.3%), waist pain in 70 cases (97.3%), blurred
vision and heavy perspiration
in 57 cases (79.2%), numbness of the
extremities
in 54 cases (75%), paroxysmal syncope in 20 cases (27.8%),
increased muscular tension in 41 cases (56.9%), reduced pain sensation
throughout the body in 40 cases (55.6%), reduced muscular strength in
the extremities
in 24 cases (33.3%) ocular-facial reflexes and orbicularis
oculi reflex positive in 21 cases (29.1%), Babinski sign positive in eight
cases (11.1%), and joint deformities or scoliosis in 60 cases (83.3%). In
Group B, symptoms were present in 23 cases (53.5%), with dizziness
present in 12 cases (27.4%), weakness and degradation of memory in 10
cases (23.3%), sleep disorders in nine cases (21.2%), and joint pain in 20
cases (46.5%). All 42 cases in Group C were without signs and
symptoms.

duan-1995 (fluoridealert.org)

Also, consider the following.

ADHD

Exposure to fluoridated water and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States: an ecological association

Parents reported higher rates of medically-diagnosed ADHD in their children in states in which a greater proportion of people receive fluoridated water from public water supplies. The relationship between fluoride exposure and ADHD warrants future study.

http://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/…/s12940-015-0003-1

Learning Impairment and Memory Impairment

Fluoride and Arsenic Exposure Impairs Learning and Memory and Decreases mGluR5 Expression in the Hippocampus and Cortex in Rats

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997496/

Reproductive issues

Adverse Effects of High Concentrations of Fluoride on Characteristics of the Mouse Ovary

Taken together, this study suggests that the administration of high concentrations of fluoride to female mice not only results in ovarian damage but also significantly reduces the number and the fertilization potential of mature oocytes by reducing the expression of genes that play an important role in the normal development and maturation of oocytes. The results obtained in this study could thus be employed for statistical analysis of the association between exposure to high concentrations of fluoride and reproductive disorders in women.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460091/

Hypothyroidism

Are fluoride levels in drinking water associated with hypothyroidism prevalence in England? A large observational study of GP practice data and fluoride levels in drinking water

http://jech.bmj.com/…/early/2015/02/09/jech-2014-204971…

Dental Fluorosis (damage to the teeth from excessive exposure to fluoride)

Chronic Fluoride Toxicity: Dental Fluorosis

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3433161/

Diabetes

Community water fluoridation predicts increase in age-adjusted incidence and prevalence of diabetes in 22 states from 2005 and 2010

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116242/

Kidney disease

Fluoride in drinking water and diet: the causative factor of chronic kidney diseases in the North Central Province of Sri Lanka

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491063/

Low bone density

High fluoride and low calcium levels in drinking water is associated with low bone mass, reduced bone quality and fragility fractures in sheep

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4048471/

Oxidative Stress

Fluoride induces oxidative damage and SIRT1/autophagy through ROS-mediated JNK signaling

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684823/

Reducing Exposure to High Fluoride Drinking Water in Estonia—A Countrywide Study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987025/

Risk Assessment of Fluoride Intake from Tea in the Republic of Ireland and its Implications for Public Health and Water Fluoridation

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4808922/

The relationships between low levels of urine fluoride on children’s intelligence, dental fluorosis in endemic fluorosis areas in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia, China.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21237562

Conclusion

Perhaps it is said best in an article in the National Library of Medicine.

The authors conclude that available evidence suggests that fluoride has a potential to cause major adverse human health problems, while having only a modest dental caries prevention effect. As part of efforts to reduce hazardous fluoride ingestion, the practice of artificial water fluoridation should be reconsidered globally…

Water Fluoridation: A Critical Review of the Physiological Effects of Ingested Fluoride as a Public Health Intervention – PMC (nih.gov)

Fluoride does show up naturally. Sufficient vitamin intake seems to be able to mitigate some of the damage from ingesting it. But we certainly don’t need to add even more of it to our water when even the warnings on the toothpaste tubes caution against swallowing the stuff.

Read More
HEALTH WELLNESS

My Response To A Critic Regarding Dr. Bryan Ardis

People like Dr. Bryan Ardis are a lightening rod when discussing Covid.

I get the controversy. He is, after all, not a “real doctor,” depending on your perspective. He’s “only” a chiropractor. So what does he know about immunology. Right?

I appreciate my critics, too. Even if they don’t know it.

One of my more popular posts is one I wrote last October regarding Dr. Bryan Ardis’ “recipe” for how to protect yourself from the spike protein in the vaccines.

I received a lot of questions regarding this post: how much of this or that should I take; why does he say this or that? Things like that.

And my response was always the same: I’m not a doctor. I don’t know. This is what the doctor himself said. Ask him.

But I did receive a well-intentioned rebuke from a reader. She wrote this (and if you go to the original post, you can see her comment in the comments section at the end of the post).

She said,

I am concerned about the amount of misinformation posted on this site. There is a great deal of uncertainty about Covid-19 & the best way to treat it, but it appears Bryan Ardis who is just a chiropractor, is taking advantage of the uncertainty & confusion to make money and attain notoriety. So much of what he says has no basis in fact.

See the comment at the end of THIS POST.

It’s a fair concern, depending on your point of view. Credentials mean something. And a lack of proper credentials might mean something, too. But how much weight do you put on credentials?

I ask the question because there are many times in history that it wasn’t the most “qualified” who made the important discoveries. Sometimes, it was the most diligent to dive into the facts and study them and to investigate and DO SCIENCE to get to the bottom of what the facts actually mean….

This post is essentially about my response to Katie, the critic of the other post.

This is my response (with additional comments added for clarity).

Hello Katie.

Sorry for the late response. I got busy with a number of things and then in December I actually ended up in the hospital with Covid for 6 days. So I’m just catching up.

I can appreciate your concerns though I obviously disagree with how well-founded they are. And I think this has a lot to do with the different a priori assumptions we bring to the discussion before it even happens.

For those who might not have heard the term “a priori assumptions,” it is a term from Latin and it refers to all those things we assume to be true when we discuss an issue with others. We assume it to be true because we “see” it as “self-evident.”

A Priori Assumptions

Definition of a priori

1a: DEDUCTIVErelating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions— compare A POSTERIORIpresupposed by experience2: being without examination or analysis PRESUMPTIVEformed or conceived beforehand

We all make a priori assumptions. Because, well… because some things are “obvious.” (Right? Maybe? Or not?)

Anyway, I continued.

I find it funny how we as a society will typically intrinsically distrust lawyers but also intrinsically trust doctors.

I also find it interesting that most who just intrinsically trust doctors seem to do so on the basis of their education and the assumption that they have been granted a medical degree and are therefore to automatically be trusted regarding the prescriptions they write, their knowledge of (in this case) immunology and the like. In reality, a GP doesn’t get a lot of hours of education in medical school (at the pre-specialist level) regarding immunology and vaccines. They do get some but not a lot.

With regard to Dr. Ardis (chiropractor) I also think we come at this from much different perspectives. As an aside, when I was in the hospital and I was debating my vaccine status and how good or bad they are with the internist assigned to my care, he did seem to recognize (judging from his facial expressions, though he didn’t directly admit) I brought some points to the discussion he had not considered before. So there’s that.

Look. Saying Dr. Ardis is a chiropractor and is therefore not qualified to speak to these issues is kind of like what the doctors said to Florence Nightingale in her day – they were the ones with the education and she was just a nurse. But (if you’ve studied history in this little niche) it turns out that little nurse Nightingale was right and all the powerful, educated doctors were wrong.

Remember Florence Nightingale

For those of you not familiar with Florence Nightingale, you need to look into this history a bit. Because if we do not learn from history, we repeat it over and over. Because that is our nature as humans. Unfortunately…

As I understand the story (and you can PLEASE correct me if I have it wrong, but) Florence Nightingale was a nurse who bumped heads with some of the doctors of her day because she thought they weren’t practicing proper hygiene and had to fight their “higher education” to convince them of the need of proper handwashing between patients. And in the end, it turned out the nurse Florence was right and the more highly-educated doctors were wrong but they didn’t want to hear it from a nurse.

For a more comprehensive view of where she fit in to the long history of the battle over handwashing you can find an interesting article about it here. But the takeaway, as I understand it, is that Florence was more “right” than the doctors she bumped heads with over the issues of her day, even though she “didn’t have the best credentials.”

Anyway, I continued.

My take on “credentials, qualifications,” and “the right to be heard.

My approach to this is not just that I look for only the most qualified in any field and exclude any opinions from those “less qualified.” My approach has always and continues to be that I look for anyone with enough education and experience in their field or related field (in this case, doctors, nurses, immunologists, and yes, chiropractors) that has enough credentials to show they are capable of rigorous study and analysis of data and then I LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE THEY BRING TO THE TABLE. I don’t automatically dismiss any opinion (whether I like it or not, or whether I agree with it or not) simply because “they are not qualified.”

If they’ve shown a level of qualification that shows me they may have enough knowledge and experience to bring facts to the table that need to be considered, I do so. In my many years of experience in my areas of expertise, I’ve had to come to the hard realization that many who are the “most qualified” are not the most informed, nor are they the most capable of addressing the issues that need to be dealt with.

So I listen to Dr. Ardis, NOT because of direct qualifications in immunology and virology (I have many I follow with those qualifications, too, who agree with him by the way). I listen to Dr. Ardis because his level of education and certification in a medical field tells me he has a base level of knowledge enough that I need to consider his input and examine the facts he brings to the discussion and evaluate what he brings based on the strength of the evidence.

And if the most qualified immunologist or virologist shows up and says he doesn’t know what he is talking about, I want to know WHY he or she says it, and what evidence (research, peer-reviewed papers, studies, etc) or direct data he or she presents to refute it. And when they do that, then I research what they say to see if it does hold up.

But I didn’t want to leave it there. Because whether Katie recognized it or not, she, too, has her own set of a priori assumptions. And maybe just a few prejudices she might not be aware of.

Anyway, I continued with this….

So…..

You’ve made some pretty strong accusations against Dr. Ardis. You speak as if you know his motives and his heart. How do you know what his motives are? Do you know him? Can you prove that, or is it just an opinion?

You also say, “so much of what he says has no basis in fact.” Can you give any specifics as to what, if any, particular things he says that have “no basis in fact?”

Let’s start there. Teach me. I’m open to learning.

I just hope you are, too.

Listen. I’ve been wrong before. And recognizing where I needed to change my mind and admitting I was biased, or prejudiced or just plain ignorant regarding topics I was talking about has gotten me a long way.

I learn much from informed people who disagree with me if they are willing to bring facts and data into the discussion that challenges my a priori assumptions.

But if you’ve already got your mind made up about people’s motives and aren’t open to reconsidering that you are maybe bringing HUGE assumptions and prejudices into your armchair judgements about why people are doing what they are doing, you might have it wrong.

And I will admit, I bring a few of my own.

Because when you talk about Dr. Ardis “being in it for the money,” I wonder if you realize that Pfizer is in it for the money, too. You have to connect the dots regarding the money about Pfizer that you think you’ve connected about Dr. Ardis. And when you do, I hope you realize that…

Pfizer is a huge advertiser on every major news media outlet out there. And if you run a news network as a business, you are smart enough to know you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you.

Back to you, Katie. I will be waiting.

Read More
HEALTH WELLNESS

NIH Article Condemns The Campaign For mRNA Vaccines As Worst Medical Disaster Ever In Vaccines.

National Institute of Health Article condemns the propaganda war that falsely promoted safety and efficacy of the mRNA vaccines.

In one of the most damning articles I have yet seen to date, retired neurosurgeon R. L. Blaylock ripped into Pfizer, Moderna, the CDC and the NIH among others, voicing concern over what he reports to be an unmitigated medical disaster in the recent vaccine technology (with much documentation to support his claims.

So, what is the truth?

The reason this article is so curious is that it is actually published on the NIH website. Considering what a job the NIH seems to have done in the last year and a half running cover for Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, it is all the more startling to see this article published at all.

The article, published on the actual NIH website, pulls no punches. It also comes well documented.

Consider his opening abstract.

The ongoing “pandemic” involving the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) has several characteristics that make it unique in the history of pandemics. This entails not only the draconian measures that some countries and individual states within the United States and initiated and made policy, most of which are without precedent or scientific support, but also the completely unscientific way the infection has been handled. For the 1st time in medical history, major experts in virology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and vaccinology have not only been ignored, but are also demonized, marginalized and in some instances, become the victim of legal measures that can only be characterized as totalitarian. Discussions involving various scientific opinions have been eliminated, top scientists have been frightened into silence by threats to their careers, physicians have lost their licenses, and the concept of early treatment has been virtually eliminated. Hundreds of thousands of people have died needlessly as a result of, in my opinion and the opinion of others, poorly designed treatment protocols, mostly stemming from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, which have been rigidly enforced among all hospitals. The economic, psychological, and institutional damage caused by these unscientific policies is virtually unmeasurable. Whole generations of young people will suffer irreparable damage, both physical and psychological, possibly forever. The truth must be told.

From the article

He does make an interesting statement. “This pandemic, and the draconian response to it, never seem to go away, perhaps by design. However, because so much is at stake, people need to hear all the critical available data.” Now, that is something many of us have long suspected. But it is interesting to see this in an article on the NIH website.

Are they running cover for the upcoming disaster?

Pardon me for being skeptical. But I have to wonder that they were ever as far out of touch with reality as their articles seemed to indicate with regard to their attacks on the safety of ivermectin and the efficacy of the trial vaccines. In another article I wrote about the incredible incompetence of the head of the NIH, I captured an interview between Franklin Graham and the president of the NIH regarding vaccine hesitancy. In that article, I questioned how this NIH chairman could possibly be so out of touch with the reasons for vaccine hesitancy when it comes to these mRNA vaccines.

Let me post the interview here, again, in case you’re curious.

More highlights from Dr. Blaylock’s article

Dr. Blaylock continues. Excerpts for highlights. The link to the entire article is posted below.

I have never seen such an enormous effort by government, medical bureaucracies, media, private institutions, and even medical institutions to prevent dissenting views from being openly discussed — even the opinions of highly qualified scientists in every field of medicine from epidemiology, infectious disease, virology, pathology, and protective equipment engineering. This includes removal of dissenting physician’s licenses, loss of hospital privileges and retraction of peer-reviewed, published articles from the medical literature.[34,36] Science, as any true scientist should know, can only advance by an open discussion of all points of view — especially dissenting viewpoints. Science advances by challenging hypotheses and prevailing theories. Institutionalized views stifle scientific advancement and will, especially in clinical medicine, ultimately harm people. These rigid viewpoints become ideological in that any dissent from the particulars of the orthodoxy constitutes a cause for a vicious attack and shunning.[17]

At the core of all medical practice is the concept of informed consent. No prescription, procedure, surgery, or vaccine is to be given or performed without advising the patient, as regards the possible risks and benefits. According to the principle of informed consent, a patient – or in this case, the public at large — must be informed of the indications for the treatment, the efficacy of the treatment, possible available alternatives to the proposed treatment, and most importantly, all the potential side effects and complications, whether acute or long term. This is especially so for new and relatively untested procedures. For example, it has been estimated that for a new type of vaccine or especially genetic treatment, a minimum of 10 years of testing are required.

From the article

WHAT IS INFORMED CONSENT: THE VACCINE, AND THE IMMUNE SYSTEM?

The most common cause for medical malpractice lawsuits is a doctor or institution not providing informed consent before initiating treatment. Not only are we now being denied informed consent, but also a war has been launched by powerful people and institutions, even governments, to prevent vital information from being disseminated.[29]

Unfortunately, the major institutions are purposefully hiding essential data and altering the data available within official circles to convince the public that there is only one solution to this so-called pandemic: Vaccination with virtually untested biological agents.

The blackout of essential information has become so intense that highly respected virologists, infectious disease specialists, and even the person who developed the technology of messenger RNA (mRNA) “vaccines,” have been banned from social media, the news media, and other sources of contact with the public at large.

The effort by vaccine promoters has become so intense that reputations are being ruined, careers destroyed, and even death threats received – as happened to the former head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Dr. Robert Redfield.

No dissenting voice is allowed, no matter how well-qualified, and supported by hard scientific data. One thing that keeps the pubic in the dark is that most people have virtually no understanding of the complex subjects of immunology….. To people untrained in these areas, it all seems quite simple: There’s a disease outbreak, you make a vaccine against the disease, people become immune, and all is well.

Unfortunately, because of the incredible complexity of the immune system, it does not always work like that. In fact, we are now learning that vaccines, under certain conditions, can make things much worse for the vaccinated.[65,91,94] However, these COVID shots are not actually vaccines — they are genetic biological agents that to this day remain largely untested. (They were tested for only 2 months before given Emergency Use Authorization [EUA] approval for public use.) That means if you take them, you become the guinea pig.

Some will respond that Pfizer did test its vaccine before being released. According to their information, over 11,000 people were given the vaccine and carefully followed. Afterward they announced the vaccine as 95% effective and quite safe. Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) interviewed several women who participated in the so-called pre-release study.[76] They each in turn had similar stories — Pfizer would not return most of their calls when they experienced serious side effects. They also stated that they signed an agreement that stated should they experience complications Pfizer would assume all cost of their medical care. Several of the ladies stated that Pfizer did not pay a cent of their medical expenses, which ran into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Despite the recommendation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that these companies should test the vaccine for at least 2 years, this suggestion was ignored by Pfizer and Moderna.

From the article

WHAT IS A MRNA VACCINE AND HOW DOES IT WORK?

As noted, these new products are not in the strict sense traditional “vaccines,” which use either a part of a whole virus or bacteria combined with very powerful immune stimulant compounds called immune adjuvants.

The mRNA vaccines, first developed in the 1980s by Dr. Robert Malone, utilizes a complex technique that employs an artificially constructed mRNA molecule. The idea is that the RNA produces the desired antigen. In this case, it produces the spike protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus that causes COVID-19 infection. Ironically, that is the very part of the virus that causes damage in people, in particular acting as a neurotoxic molecule.[39] However, injecting mRNA by itself won’t work because the body contains an enzyme that would quickly destroy it.

To prevent this, Dr. Malone created a nanolipid carrier that is basically like a nanosized sac that contains the mRNA (resembles an artificial exosome).[50] This special carrier sac is incredibly small — about the size of the virus.[63]

We’ve been told that the carrier sac (the nanolipid carrier) is destroyed within a few days, thus preventing the body from continuously producing the deadly spike protein. . However, the truth is that the makers of these biological agents added polyethylene glycol to protect the nanolipid carrier so it would last much longer in the body — thus allowing the mRNA to produce far more spike protein for a much longer period. In fact, we don’t know how long the nanolipid/mRNA package lasts. The generated spike proteins may last months, years, or even a lifetime.

To summarize: The “vaccines” consist of artificially synthesized mRNA encapsulated within a protective sac (nanolipid carrier). The mRNA within the sac produces and releases an increasing amount of the destructive spike protein into your body — anywhere the nanolipid carrier is deposited. This is the critical part of the story. We were told that this sac of mRNA remains at the injection site in the person’s arm, continuously producing the spike protein. Theoretically, your body then can make antibodies against the spike protein, supposedly protecting you from COVID-19 infection.

Dr. Malone and others discovered that Pfizer had secretly conducted a biodistribution study, to see where the nanolipid carrier went after being injected into the limb of the recipient of the vaccine. A Freedom of Information lawsuit was used to obtain a copy of this study performed secretly by Pfizer. The results were quite revealing and very frightening.

They discovered that rather than remaining at the site of the injection (usually the arm-deltoid region), these mRNA-containing nanolipid carriers rapidly entered the bloodstream and were distributed all over the body, including the brain.[49]

The highest concentration of the injected nanolipid carriers was found in the ovaries of women.[75] The second highest concentration was within the bone marrow. High concentrations were also seen in the liver, lymph nodes, and spleen. In fact, the studies that demonstrated the nanolipid carriers were distributed among a number of tissues and organs, including lungs, heart, muscles, spinal cord, brain and kidneys.

From the article

THE SIDE EFFECTS OF THE GENETIC VACCINES AND EARLY TREATMENTS

This distribution could explain some of the devastating complications being reported involving several organ systems in people who have received the COVID vaccines. For example, infiltration of the heart explains the rising number of cases of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) being reported. More than 2,700 cases of vaccine-induced heart inflammation (myocarditis and pericarditis) have occurred among all age groups.[68] Among ages 12– 17 years, there have been 520 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis. These young people face progressive heart failure, arrhythmias, and other cardiac problems later in their lives. During this same period, there were 16,310 deaths reported, an increase of 373 over the previous week. These numbers are far higher than are seen with the viral infection itself or associated with other vaccines.

Because the spike protein-producing nanolipid carriers are lodged within organs and tissues, the immune system is unable to respond efficiently to prevent damage and may be responsible for much of the damage as a bystander injury effect. For the vaccines using two injections, the priming effect of the first dose would almost assure a magnification of the damage, possibly by immunoexcitotoxicity.[15,16]

With some of these nanolipid carriers now lodged within the cells, any attempt by the immune system to neutralize them will cause considerable damage not only to those cells, but to a wide zone of cells around them. This is referred to as “bystander damage.”

Essentially, once people are vaccinated, they will have the spike protein being produced everywhere in their bodies. Moreover again, recent studies confirm that it is the spike protein that causes COVID damage. That is, it’s toxic.

By this time, most, if not all the viruses, are no longer viable.[40,86,98] However, the dead viruses remain within the tissues, mainly in the lungs, where they stimulate the immune system to overreact — a mechanism, as stated, we refer to as a cytokine storm. Dead viruses can stimulate the immune system just as well as live viruses.

Studies of patients at this cytokine storm stage have shown that their breath contains no live viruses. Thus, wearing a mask is useless, and it impairs the patient’s ability to get sufficient oxygen. Ironically, putting these patients on a ventilator (respirator) dramatically increases the death rate. It’s thought that by using positive pressure to force the lung to work, the ventilator further damages the already severely damaged lungs.

The greatest success in saving such patients occurs when strong anti-inflammatory medications — such as high-dose corticosteroids, intravenous vitamin C, and Ivermectin are used.[45] In fact, in 27 studies conducted all over the world, Ivermectin drastically cut the death rate from COVID-19, even in the most severe and advanced cases.[4]

From the article

VACCINES MAY INCREASE THE SEVERITY OF COVID SYMPTOMS AND OVERREACTION OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM

The difference between getting infected with the virus and exposure to the vaccine is that in the former case only people with age-related frailty, several chronic illnesses, immune deficiencies, and people with other immune-suppressing disorders are at any substantial risk from COVID-19. That is no more than 5% of the population.

Severe disease or death in a healthy person below age 40 is extremely rare, occurring <0.01% of the time. But unlike natural infection, the vaccine — while still dangerous to those who are immune-suppressed — also does serious damage to young people, even if they’re healthy. The majority of deaths associated with the vaccines are among the aged population, with the average age being 73.1 years.

As noted, we’ve seen a dramatic rise in cases of myocarditis in the vaccinated young, along with other serious injuries and deaths. This is happening because the nanolipid carrier of the mRNA travels directly to the heart, triggering intense inflammation in their heart muscle.[59] As also noted, this process could result in the production of the spike proteins for months, years, or even for a lifetime. The nanolipid carrier has been shown to enter the brain, liver, spleen, lymph nodes, and kidneys. Another reaction to these vaccines is what’s called antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), a common reaction observed with other types of vaccines.[46,92] With ADE, exposure to the wild-type virus in the vaccinated person can trigger a much more pathological damaging effect than in the unvaccinated person.

Because the COVID vaccines trigger a dramatic increase in antibody production, ADE becomes much more likely. Not only does this result in an increase in severity of symptoms if a vaccinated person is exposed to the natural virus in the future, but the virus also reproduces faster and becomes more pathogenic, meaning the severity of a vaccinated person’s illness is worse.

The H1N1 flu vaccine increased the risk of death for those who were vaccinated when they were exposed to the flu virus.[6] We see the same phenomenon with these COVID “vaccines,” and many other types of vaccines. It may be that some of the hospitalizations and deaths now being seen are not due to a so-called “Delta variant,” but rather are caused by the vaccines themselves.[55,89,90]

Go to:

ARE THE NEW WAVES OF INFECTION REAL? IS TESTING FOR COVID-19 ACCURATE?

The majority of the testing for COVID infection has been performed using what is called a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in which a person’s nose or sometimes throat is swabbed for evidence of viral genetic material. The inventor of this test stated that no clinical infection can be diagnosed using the PCR test alone. Yet the CDC used this test to imply that tens of millions of Americans were infected with COVID-19.

We have now learned that the test does not identify the whole virus, just a segment. In addition, many other viruses, bacteria, and even some things that are not microorganisms at all can yield a positive test. For instance, the president of Tanzania secretly had a sheep, a goat, and a pawpaw (a type of fruit) tested using PCR by his health department.[60] The goat and the pawpaw both tested positive.

Recently, the CDC announced that the PCR test would no longer be used because they discovered that it cross-reacts with the influenza virus, meaning virtually all influenza infections in the last flu season could have been diagnosed as COVID-19. This explains why there were only a few hundred flu cases reported in the entire U.S. this past season — a number unprecedented in modern times. (The CDC claims that each year there are about 30,000 deaths from the flu and over 300,000 hospital admissions).

Cycles of the PCR test are run to amplify its sensitivity, and it is known that doing more than 30 cycles increases the likelihood of the test being falsely positive. Yet the CDC recommended that all labs perform 40 or more cycles, which would have meant that around 97% of positive tests were, in fact, negative. That is, the person tested most likely did not have a COVID infection.

Combined with the lack of specificity of the PCR test, fear mongering by the media and the CDC greatly exaggerated the impact of the first wave of the COVID outbreak. The same is almost certainly true with the new Delta variant. Virologists emphasize that the more people who are vaccinated, the more variants will appear.[20] However, while the variants are more contagious, they are less harmful. This is the nature of virus mutations.

From the article

WHO ARE THE SUPERSPREADERS OF THE VIRUS?

In fact, based on the observation that the vaccinated have very high titers of virus in their nasopharynx, according to mRNA technology developer Dr. Robert Malone, it is the vaccinated who are more likely spreading the new variant, as they remain asymptomatic longer than an unvaccinated person.[47] Viral titers (concentrations) were found to be very high in the noses of vaccinated as well as infected unvaccinated people. If the “vaccine” worked, they should have found none or extremely small amounts of the virus.

The average age of death from COVID-19 is around 75 years (95% occurred over age 65 years). Moreover, the highest death rate among vaccinated people is in the same age group — the very ones the vaccines are supposed to protect.

The most egregious form of this fear mongering is to imply that the Delta variant infections are all in the unvaccinated. This is not true. A study in Scotland, for example, found that 87% of Delta variant cases occurred in the fully vaccinated.[27] Similar findings were reported in the United Kingdom and Israel. Moreover, a recent report released by the CDC found that 74% of the cases in a Cape Cod, Massachusetts cluster were among vaccinated individuals.[54] Most of these people were reported to have the Delta variant.

From the article

WHAT ARE THE TRUE NUMBERS?

The vaccines for COVID-19 stand to make more money for their developers than any other vaccines at any time in history. Those same companies also wield enormous financial power and influence in the media, medical journals, medical societies (such as the American Medical Association), hospitals, research institutions, and government bureaucracies (such as the National Institutes of Health [NIH]). Moreover, of course, they donate vast sums to elected officials.

We are witnessing an unprecedented attack on free speech directed at anyone who challenges pro-vaccine propaganda, including virologists, infectious disease specialists, epidemiologists, and pulmonologists. Dr. Michael Yeadon, ex-chief science officer for Pfizer; a whistleblower from Moderna; Dr. Robert Malone, the developer of the mRNA vaccine technique; and other highly qualified scientists have been banned from social media and the mainstream news outlets for speaking out. Why? Because they might convince people that these vaccines are dangerous, and that they should be halted immediately.

From the article

You can read the article HERE for the full report.

ATTACKING THE REAL CURES

As bad as all this is, what’s worse in the alignment of forces being used to prevent safe methods from being used to stop this virus. When it was revealed that early use of hydroxychloroquine could significantly reduce the severity of the disease and prevent the need for a ventilator, reports immediately surfaced from government agencies declaring that the drug was of no use, was dangerous, and should not be used. This occurred despite reports of hydroxychloroquine’s benefits from doctors actually treating patients. In some states, prescriptions for hydroxychloroquine were banned. We see the same thing with Ivermectin, another highly effective and safe medication.[45]

Every time a treatment was discovered that improved COVID patients’ outcomes or prevented transmission of the virus, forces stepped in to prevent the treatment from being used.

A growing number of natural treatments that could have prevented the spread of this virus, including most of the serious infections, have been blocked by these controllers. Incredibly, a law was passed that prevented clinical physicians from even suggesting such treatments. Curcumin, baicalin, apigenin, luteolin, EGCG, myoinositol, ashwagandha, magnesium, docosahexaenoic acid/ eicosapentaenoic acid, high dose IV vitamin C, Vitamin D3, melatonin, astragalus, beta-glucan, mushroom extracts, and ashwagandha all enhance a person’s immunity, thus preventing infection.[2,8,12,13,28,35,37,42,48,51,52,61,67,69,70,73,80,84,87,88,96,97]

Dr. Pierre Kory, a founder of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), made a number of discoveries that dramatically improved the survival of patients with serious COVID-19 cases. Unlike many of the vaccine-only proponents, Dr. Kory has spent his professional life treating some of the sickest in intensive care unit (ICU) settings, including hundreds of COVID patients. But each discovery he made was intensely resisted and rejected by the medical elite and bureaucracies, at least until the proof became so overwhelming that they could no longer deny it. In the interim, thousands died as a result of the elite controller’s intransigence. There is evidence that early treatment, before deterioration occurs, can reduce hospitalization by 85 percent.[53]

From the article

THE STRANGE CASE OF IVERMECTIN

Dr. Kory also discovered that Ivermectin, a medicine used to treat parasitic infections, was perhaps one of the most powerful weapons we possess in the battle against COVID-19, reducing the death rate of even very sick patients to such a degree that it has been called a medical miracle.[9,21,41,44]

Dr. Kory and his colleagues — all highly respected and frequently quoted pulmonary and infectious disease experts — put together a protocol using this safe, inexpensive medicine and other compounds. (FLCCC Alliance. www.flccc.net.) Their protocol has now been used around the world but not in the United States. Deaths and cases requiring hospitalization in countries that have used Ivermectin — including Mexico, India, Brazil, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Paraguay, Peru, Argentina, Zimbabwe, and major cities in other countries — have been dramatically and rapidly reduced. In addition, recovery times have been shortened, patient deterioration has been prevented when the drug was used early, and mortality has been reduced among severely ill ICU patients.

In fact, when taken once a week, Ivermectin has been shown to dramatically prevent COVID infection, even in hospital workers who are around many sick patients.[12,14] Ivermectin has been studied and shown to be highly effective in 27 carefully controlled trials that included 6,612 patients; 16 trials were randomized, prospective, controlled trials of the highest quality. Yet, the medical establishment — the vaccine-only promoters — has rejected even considering this safe, inexpensive medication for treatment or prevention of COVID.

Worse, doctors, as well as the general public, are warned by medical associations, the FDA and the CDC not to use Ivermectin.[93] In some states, doctors can lose their license should they write a prescription for this lifesaving medication, one that has been used safely for the past 40 years all over the world as a treatment for parasitic infections.[33,58] Besides being a powerful anti-inflammatory and suppressing viral replication Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit a major form of excitotoxicity seen in the face of chronic inflammation and microglial activation.[3]

From the article

THE ROLE OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES IN COVID-19 TREATMENTS AND FEAR

It seems to me, and others, that the pharmaceutical companies making these vaccines don’t want a rival treatment that would cut into their profits. In my opinion, these experimental vaccines are being distributed to the public under a false pretense. According to the EUA act, an experimental treatment cannot be used except in a proven national emergency (pandemic), and only if there are no other available treatments for the condition. Keep in mind that the FDA did not approve the drug presently being used by Pfizer — it is still under EUA regulations as an experimental “vaccine.”

COVID-19 never satisfied the criteria for a pandemic, which requires that the infection must affect a large number of people around the world and have a high mortality rate. This pandemic definition has been used for decades — until this outbreak. The World Health Organization changed the criteria for this “pandemic,” dropping the need for a high death rate.

For the majority of people, the death rate from COVID-19 is lower than that of a mild to moderate flu season. For those under age 40, the death rate is 0.01%; 99.99% of those infected will fully recover. For all ages, the death rate is 0.26%; 99.74% will recover. Those numbers do not justify mandatory vaccination.

On the other hand, eight clinical trials have shown a significant reduction in transmission of COVID-19, even among healthcare workers, with the use of Ivermectin. (FLCCC data).[32] Three of those studies were randomized clinical trials — research of the highest order. Based on these studies, the emergency authorization should be revoked, and vaccination should be stopped before more people are hurt.

From the article

MORE NATURAL PROTECTIONS AGAINST COVID

There are a number of other natural treatments and preventatives that could be used by anyone wanting to protect themselves from COVID. The basis for all of these treatments is reducing inflammation, and several natural compounds also restore immune balance. Others are beneficial because they reduce immunoexcitotoxicity, a possible mechanism for cytokine storms.

These compounds include:

  • Nano-curcumin
  • Nano-quercetin
  • N-acetyl-L-cysteine
  • Intravenous Vitamin C (high dose)
  • Melatonin
  • B-complex vitamins
  • Hesperidin
  • Pterostilbene
  • Apigenin
  • Magnesium
  • Taurine
  • Baicalin.

Immune stimulants should only be used during the first 8 days of a COVID infection to prevent aggravating hyperimmune symptoms. This 8-day period is the period when the virus is reproducing very rapidly in the lungs. After 8–11 days, all the viruses are dead, and then the danger is from a hyperimmune reaction to those dead viruses. At this stage the idea is to target inflammation and excitotoxicity, as live viruses are no longer the chief danger in most cases.

Recent studies have shown that a significant number of fully vaccinated people are contracting (supposedly) COVID-19 infections as in Israel, where virtually everyone has been vaccinated. In a carefully conducted study in Vietnam hospitals, it was shown that the vaccinated medical care workers were spreading high levels of viruses to fellow workers, patients, and visitors.[23] A majority of medical centers and hospitals in the United States have mandated vaccines for all employees, even those not in contact with patients. These studies suggest that the medical staff is now a major source of Covid-19 transmission and are acting as superspreaders.

More than 80% of the COVID-variant cases are in fully vaccinated people, and the latest reports indicate the vaccines are ineffective against variants — hence the call for renewed masking. (CDC report).[83] Ivermectin as a preventive measure has a success rate of around 80 to 85% against COVID-19. Some studies have reported no infections in hospital workers taking Ivermectin.

Fear remains the vaccine makers main weapon. The latest strategy is to convince the public that second and third waves of new variants will restore the dangers that have subsided since the original appearance of this virus. All these preventive measures should work against any and all variants. And natural immunity to the original virus appears to give a person full protection against the so-called Delta variant.

This type of cross-immunity occurred with the outbreak of the much deadlier SARS virus, 2002–2004, even with 30% viral mutation variance. The Delta variant differs from the original COVID virus genetically by a mere 1.3%.

Go to:

UNKNOWN LONG-TERM COMPLICATIONS

These vaccines were allowed to be used via the EUA even though only very short-term safety studies (2 months) had been conducted by the manufacturers. Several people who participated in these safety trials stated in a forum held by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) that Pfizer representatives promised them that any medical expenses they incurred as a result of the vaccines would be taken care of by the company. According to this testimony — Pfizer did not follow through on that promise.

Several women suffered serious and apparently permanent damage from taking the test vaccines. Several of these participants, as stated earlier, confirmed that Pfizer representatives would not return their calls, and never paid a cent of their incurred medical expenses. The VAERS data indicates that between December 14, 2020 and October 1, 2021 there were 111,921 reports of serious injuries following the COVID-19 vaccinations, which adds credence to the claims of the pre-release study group as far as a high incidence of serious complications before these vaccines were release upon the public.[68]

The FDA recommended a 2-year intensive study of those who had been vaccinated. The pharmaceutical companies rejected that recommendation. Congressional inquiries have shown that essentially zero studies have been conducted on the millions of American citizens who have taken these vaccines. (As noted in a letter from Senator Johnson to Francis Collins, director of the NIH; Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC; and Janet Woodcock, acting commissioner of the FDA on July 13, 2021).

So far, we’ve only seen the short-term side effects of these vaccines, which are terrifying enough. However, long-term effects can occur years or even decades following vaccination.

From the article

VACCINES AND PREGNANCY

Because the biodistribution study (noted above) demonstrates that the highest concentration of the mRNA-containing nanolipid carrier per gram of tissue in women occurred in the ovaries, meaning every vaccinated woman of reproductive age must now worry about possible infertility or a higher risk of ovarian cancer. (The nanolipid mRNA induces chronic inflammation, the principal cause of most cancers). Data from a corrected preliminary study of vaccinated pregnant women reported in the New England Journal of Medicine demonstrated that pregnant women vaccinated during the first trimester of their pregnancy (20 weeks), had an 82% chance of losing their baby.[78] Yet the American Academy of Obstetrics and Gynecology announced, as did the CDC, that these vaccines were safe to take during pregnancy. It is known that immune stimulation during the third trimester dramatically increases the risk of the child becoming autistic or developing schizophrenia later in life.[56,64] An extensive literature demonstrates the danger of immune stimulation during pregnancy.[10,11,18,19,62]

We will not know if women vaccinated during their third trimester will have children with a higher risk of becoming autistic for at least 6 years, the usual time span for symptom appearance. Moreover, we will not know if a similarly vaccinated woman will have a schizophrenic child until that child reaches adolescence, which is the usual time of first symptom appearance for that condition.[43] As far as I know, no women or their husbands were warned of this real danger to their children.

No one knows what may happen in the future to these children. By their own admission the vaccine manufacturers conducted no studies with pregnant women prior to the release of these vaccines.

Go to:

SERIOUS THREAT OF LONG-TERM NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS: OTHER WAYS THE VIRUS CAN INFECT CELLS IN THE BODY

Dr. Blaylock Continues:

I have written several articles in peer-reviewed medical journals on the effects of excessive vaccination on brain development.[16,18] As noted, immune stimulation during pregnancy can alter how the child’s brain develops. We know that the adult brain is also at risk following excessive immune stimulation.[66,70] One obvious risk is the induction of autoimmune diseases such as lupus, autoimmune encephalomyelitis, and multiple sclerosis. Neurodegenerative disease are also a real possibility based on careful research linking peripheral inflammation and central nervous system microglial/macrophage priming and activation.[25,57,74] There is some evidence that the spike protein may be able to trigger several neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and most frightening Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.[95] Recently, neurologists have classified at least two cases of neurological disorders in women post COVID-19 vaccination, which they classified as “functional” neurological disorders, suggesting a psychiatric causation. While this could be true in some cases, we must keep in mind that the medical establishment also classified fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and autism spectrum disorders all as “functional” until real neurological explanations were forth coming. In a recent review Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh reviewed a number of possible unintended consequences associated with the mRNA vaccines with strong scientific reasoning.[77] There is also evidence that the mRNA being released can enter the cell nucleus thus altering the DNA of the cell.[81] This would open the possibility of a vertical transfer to offspring.

CROSS REACTION WITH OTHER HUMAN TISSUES: AUTO IMMUNITY

Studies by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler and others have confirmed that components of the COVID vaccines cross-react with more than 11 human tissues, meaning autoimmune diseases can develop involving one or all those tissues.

USING OTHER VIRUS CARRIERS IN THE BODY TO REACH THE CELLS: EXOSOMES

New studies have demonstrated a very frightening possibility. We are all being told that the virus enters cells using principally the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor. But in truth, there is another mechanism: exosomes.[30,38,85] Exosomes are much like the nanolipid carrier used in the vaccines. They are microscopic sacs that contain various components — such as RNA and DNA fragments — that can leave the cell, travel to other cells, enter them, and pass along genetic information. Exosomes are a cell-communication mechanism.

Unfortunately, many viruses can hijack these exosomes, insert their genetic information, and then exit the infected cells and travel to surrounding cells or even distant cells and enter them, thus spreading the infection. Infections by viruses cause the infected cell to produce a tremendous number of exosomes — all containing the viruses’ genetic information. The scary part is that the mRNA “vaccines” are essentially artificial exosomes, each carrying the very part of the virus (the spike protein) that does harm to the body. We have, in essence, traded a natural infection for an artificial one that could be far worse.

OVERREACTION OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM STIMULATED BY THE VIRUS; CYTOKINE STORM (IMMUNOEXCITOTOXICITY IN THE BRAIN AND SPINAL CORD)

A recent study demonstrated just how dangerous it is when infected exosomes enter the brain.[57] These exosomes entered microglia, the brain’s special immune cells and the main source of excitotoxins. The exosomes caused the microglia to start generating very high levels of inflammatory cytokines and other immune mediators. These inflammatory substances are then released and do considerable harm to surrounding brain structures. This all occurs with the first injection.

We say that these microglia are “primed,” meaning they are in a state of hyperreactivity, but have not fully released their destructive cytokines and excitotoxins yet. The second injection of the mRNA COVID vaccine activates this primed microglia, putting them into an extremely destructive state in which they release high concentrations of inflammatory cytokines and excitotoxins. This explains why people have worse reactions to the second vaccine dose.

The fear is that these vaccines could very well trigger neurodegeneration within specific brain areas, each causing a particular neurological disorder such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS, or even a totally new neurological disorder never seen before.[22]

These vaccines can also trigger seizures, strokes, and even neuropsychiatric disorders. Keep in mind that in some cases these disorders do not appear for years or even decades. Dr. Peter McCullough, a professor of internal medicine and cardiology, cited a case in which a woman lost all memory after receiving the first vaccine dose.[26] He also told of a fully vaccinated woman who lost her baby after breastfeeding. The child died of a thrombotic/hemorrhagic episode.

It has been shown that the nanolipid carrier does pass into the mother’s breast milk and can be transmitted through the placenta.[1,79,82] Studies have now shown that the COVID-19 spike protein can induce Parkinson’s disease in humans.[26] The vaccine, in essence, releases massive doses of the spike protein within the body, including in the brain and spinal cord. Importantly, the release, because of the widespread distribution of the nanolipid carriers, is directly within each involved tissue, thus maximizing the damage. This is a disaster in the making. [4,7] In my opinion, these vaccines should be stopped now before many more are seriously hurt or even killed.[71,72]

So back to my thoughts about this stuff

Cogny Mann here. I can’t help but wonder if the NIH is trying to distance itself from an impending disaster by allowing this article to be published. The Pfizer documents are being released, with damning evidence against their knowledge of these issues and their attempts to cover it up.

The Epoch Times recently published an article documenting how many people were paid off to “promote” the vaccines and “bury the evidence.” At this point, the best the NIH might be able to do to save face is to eat its own to try to maintain some semblance of credibility.

I don’t know. I’m just thinking out loud.

The orignal article is referenced on the NIH web page Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth? – PMC (nih.gov)

Orignal article cited: Blaylock RL. Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth? Surg Neurol Int 2021;12:591.

Read More
HEALTH WELLNESS

Where Can I Get Ivermectin

A common item on the mind of the health-conscious consumer who is in the know on all treatments Covid is Ivermectin. There are multitudes of studies and health care professionals that attest to the effectiveness of Ivermectin in treating Covid. The question on everyone’s mind, though, is “where can I get Ivermectin?”

Let’s consider what Ivermectin is, what the health care providers who promote it say about why they consider it a viable treatment in the arsenal of weapons against Covid, and why you might be on the list of people who want to have some.

What is Ivermectin?

According to Wikipedia,

Ivermectin (/ˌaɪvərˈmɛktɪn/EYE-vər-MEK-tin) is an antiparasiticdrug.[6] After its discovery in 1975,[7] its first uses were in veterinary medicine to prevent and treat heartworm and acariasis.[8] Approved for human use in 1987,[9] today it is used to treat infestations including head licescabiesriver blindness (onchocerciasis), strongyloidiasistrichuriasisascariasis and lymphatic filariasis.[8][10][11][12] It works through many mechanisms to kill the targeted parasites,[10] and can be taken orally, or applied to the skin for external infestations.[10][13] It belongs to the avermectin family of medications.[10]

From Wikipedia

It was actually discovered in a soil sample in Japan but has been developed now in labs and used around the world for many treatments. Even the NIH speaks highly of it as a “wonder drug” of sorts.

There are few drugs that can seriously lay claim to the title of ‘Wonder drug’, penicillin and aspirin being two that have perhaps had greatest beneficial impact on the health and wellbeing of Mankind. But ivermectin can also be considered alongside those worthy contenders, based on its versatility, safety and the beneficial impact that it has had, and continues to have, worldwide—especially on hundreds of millions of the world’s poorest people.

From the NIH website

It is ironic that the same Wikipedia article above speaks so unfavorably about Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid-19. But there are some doctors who have been using it specifically for that purpose, and they report that they do so with great success.

Whether it accomplishes that task or not is something for you to discuss with your healthcare provider (because I am not one and I don’t give medical advice). I’m merely passing on information that I am aware of to those who find it of interest for whatever ideas come to mind.

But one medical doctor of great interest who claims to have treated many thousands of patients over the last couple years (using drugs like ivermectin and hydroxichloriquine, among others) is Dr. Zalenko.

Enter Dr. Zalenko

If you’ve not heard of Dr. Vladimir Zalenko, you need to know about this gentleman. He is a Jewish doctor in New York with a practice in family medicine for over 20 years.

Dr. Zalenko on Covid

Dr. Zalenko has successfully treated many thousands of patients with Covid, with a 99% survival rate of high risk Covid patients over the last couple years

Dr. Zalenko on Ivermectin

To give you an idea of his rate of effectiveness in treating patients with ivermectin and hydroxichloroquine among other things, consider this excerpt from an article at “Citizen’s Journal.”

When New York state physician Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko drew the attention of President Trump back in the spring of 2020 with a simple protocol of cheap, proven, widely available drugs for COVID-19 that included hydroxychloroquine, he had successfully treated more more than 350 patients, with only one needing hospitalization.

Nearly two years later, amid continued government and media suppression of early treatments, Zelenko told WND in a video interview that he and his team have administered what is now know as the Zelenko Protocol to more than 7,000 COVID patients, with only three deaths.

From Citizen’s Journal

So now, consider Dr. Zalenko on Quercitin – a “substitute” for ivermectin

According to Dr. Zalenko, quercetin has an effect similar to ivermectin, though not as strong an effect. That is, it is a useful agent for getting the zinc into the cell so the zinc can keep the virus from entering it. Not the silver bullet that ivermectin is, but it gets the job done.

Or, in the doctor’s words, “by way of an analogy, consider quercetin a .22 calibre pistol and ivermectin as a .50 calibre machine gun.”

Better the hand gun that you have than the machine gun you can’t get if you have to kill something. It works rather well and it’s available.

Here Dr. Zalenko explain it in his own words, in context.

Aim for an eagle, bag a pheasant; but you won’t eat crow.

By the way, if you did want to try to obtain ivermectin (for whatever reason – say, treating parasites in your horses or something)….

You might want to check out this web site for information on the drug. Please be aware, I’m not promoting ivermectin as a cure or treatment. I am not a health care practitioner. If you are going to try to pursue something like this as a course of treatment for anything, you need to do it on the advice of a healthcare professional. But if you’re curious, check out Offshore Drug Mart. I have been told they are a great source for all your prescription needs – even the hard to get ones.

Read More