Endless Boosters Threaten To Destroy Normal Immune Function

Published on January 7, 2022Written by technocracy.news

A number of medical experts, scientists and published studies now warn that the COVID shots reprogram your immune system to respond in a dysfunctional manner.

Aside from increasing vulnerability to infections, this can also result in autoimmune diseases and cancer.
Pfizer Shot Reprograms Both Arms of Your Immune System
A paper1 posted May 6, 2021, on the preprint server medRxiv reported that the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID jab “reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses,” causing immune depletion.
While they confirmed the jab “induced effective humoral and cellular immunity against several SARS-CoV-2 variants,” the shot “also modulated the production of inflammatory cytokines by innate immune cells upon stimulation with both specific (SARS-CoV-2) and nonspecific (viral, fungal and bacterial) stimuli.”
In other words, we’re looking at a horrible tradeoff. You may get some protection against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, but you’re weakening your overall immune function, which opens the door wide to all sorts of other health problems, from bacterial, fungal and viral infections to cancer and autoimmunity.
After the injection, innate immune cells had a markedly decreased response to toll-like receptors 4, 7 and 8 (TLR4, TLR7, TLR8) ligands, while cytokine responses induced by fungi were stronger. According to the authors, defects in TLR7 have previously been linked to an increased susceptibility to COVID-19 in young males.
People who were “fully vaccinated,” having received two doses of the Pfizer shot, also produced significantly less interferon upon stimulation, and this can hamper the initial innate immune response against the virus.
Repeated Vaccinations and the Risk of Autoimmunity
Pathogenic infections and cancer are but two potential outcomes of this kind of reprogramming. Previous research, for example, has linked defects in the immune system to a higher risk of autoimmune diseases. What’s more, it’s been shown that antigens in vaccines, specifically, can induce this kind of immune system dysfunction.2 As reported in the paper in question:3
“Repeated immunization with antigen causes systemic autoimmunity in mice otherwise not prone to spontaneous autoimmune diseases. Overstimulation of CD4+ T cells led to the development of autoantibody-inducing CD4+ T (aiCD4+ T) cell which had undergone T cell receptor (TCR) revision and was capable of inducing autoantibodies.
The aiCD4+ T cell was induced by de novo TCR revision but not by cross-reaction, and subsequently overstimulated CD8+ T cells, driving them to become antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL).
These CTLs could be further matured by antigen cross-presentation, after which they caused autoimmune tissue injury akin to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.”
Fast-forward to mid-May 2021, when a study4 in the Journal of Clinical Investigations reported that “SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce broad CD4+ T cell responses that recognize SARS-CoV-2 variants and HCoV-NL63.” HCoV-NL63 is a human coronavirus associated with the common cold.
“Interestingly, we observed a 3-fold increase in the CD4+ T cell responses to HCoV-NL63 spike peptides after vaccination,” the authors stated, adding, “Our results suggest that T cell responses elicited or enhanced by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines may be able to control SARS-CoV-2 variants and lead to cross-protection against some endemic coronaviruses.”
What they did not address was that excessive CD4a+ T cell responses could also result in the development of autoantibodies and autoimmune disease.
COVID Shots May Also Cause More Hazardous Variants
We’ve long known that leaky or nonsterilizing vaccines can trigger the evolution of more hazardous viruses.5,6,7,8 So far, SARS-CoV-2 variants have mutated into less dangerous versions, which is fortunate, but the risk of the COVID shots creating a “monster” still remains.
In a February 9, 2021, article,9 NPR highlighted this risk, stating that “vaccines could drive the evolution of more COVID-19 mutants.” According to NPR science correspondent Richard Harris, “the virus is always mutating. And if one happens to produce a mutation that makes it less vulnerable to the vaccine, that virus could simply multiply in a vaccinated individual.”
The Omicron variant appears to have significant resistance against antibodies produced by the original COVID shots, which is why Omicron infection is being primarily reported in those who have received the injections.
In 2018, Quanta Magazine detailed how vaccines drive the evolution of pathogens.10 I’ve referenced that article on previous occasions, as have many others. In response, the editor of Quanta Magazine added a “disclaimer” dated December 6, 2021, to the article, stating:
“This article from 2018 discusses how leaky vaccines — vaccines that do not reduce viral replication or transmission to others — can drive the pathogens they target to evolve and become more virulent. These concerns do not apply to COVID-19 vaccines, because COVID-19 vaccines significantly reduce coronavirus replication and transmission, reducing the chance that mutations occur and variants arise …”
That statement is clearly false, as studies have repeatedly shown the COVID shots are in fact leaky. They do not “significantly reduce” viral replication or transmission, as the editor claims. Quite the opposite.
People who have received one or more COVID shots have been found to harbor higher viral loads than the unvaccinated, and Israel (which appears to have the best tracking and monitoring) reports that the worst COVID cases are in those who are fully vaxxed.
December 6, 2021, Newsweek11 reported a COVID outbreak among “fully vaccinated” hospital staff in Spain. After a Christmas dinner with more than 170 fully vaxxed health care workers in attendance, nearly 70 of them tested positive for COVID. Some reported mild symptoms. Daniel Horowitz pointed out the editor’s false note in a December 9, 2021, Blaze post:12
“Leaky vaccines are worse than no vaccine at all. That is the unmistakable conclusion one would derive from a May 2018 article in Quanta magazine, a top scientific publication, about the unsuccessful attempts to create vaccines for HIV, malaria, and anthrax that aren’t leaky and don’t run the risk of making the pathogens more dangerous.
Yet now that we are seeing such a microbiological Frankenstein play out in real life and people like Dr. Robert Malone have been citing this article to raise red flags about the leaky COVID shots, Quanta magazine took the unprecedented step of slapping an editor’s note on an article three and a half years later to get people to stop applying it to the leakiest vaccine of all time.”
COVID Shots Stop Working Within a Few Months
A study in the New England Journal of Medicine, published December 9, 2021, also confirms that whatever protection you get from the Pfizer COVID shot is short in duration. As explained by the authors:13
“In December 2020, Israel began a mass vaccination campaign against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) by administering the BNT162b2 vaccine, which led to a sharp curtailing of the outbreak.
After a period with almost no cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, a resurgent Covid-19 outbreak began in mid-June 2021. Possible reasons for the resurgence were reduced vaccine effectiveness against the delta (B.1.617.2) variant and waning immunity.
We used data on confirmed infection and severe disease collected from an Israeli national database for the period of July 11 to 31, 2021, for all Israeli residents who had been fully vaccinated before June 2021.
We used a Poisson regression model to compare rates of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe Covid-19 among persons vaccinated during different time periods, with stratification according to age group and with adjustment for possible confounding factors.
Among persons 60 years of age or older, the rate of infection in the July 11-31 period was higher among persons who became fully vaccinated in January 2021 (when they were first eligible) than among those fully vaccinated 2 months later, in March (rate ratio, 1.6 …)
Among persons 40 to 59 years of age, the rate ratio for infection among those fully vaccinated in February (when they were first eligible), as compared with 2 months later, in April, was 1.7 … Among persons 16 to 39 years of age, the rate ratio for infection among those fully vaccinated in March (when they were first eligible), as compared with 2 months later, in May, was 1.6 …
The rate ratio for severe disease among persons fully vaccinated in the month when they were first eligible, as compared with those fully vaccinated in March, was 1.8 … among persons 60 years of age or older and 2.2 … among those 40 to 59 years of age …
These findings indicate that immunity against the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 waned in all age groups a few months after receipt of the second dose of vaccine.”
Two Doses Aren’t Enough
Earlier this year, vaccine makers and health authorities said the shots were about 95 percent effective and if enough people got the shots, normalcy would be restored. We now know that was a false promise. The goal post was moved back with the emergence of Delta and then Omicron, for which we’re now told we need a third booster.
December 13, 2021, Reuters14 reported that British scientists have concluded “two-dose COVID-19 vaccine regimens do not induce enough neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron coronavirus variant,” and that “increased infections in those previously infected or vaccinated may be likely.”
‘Just Deal With’ Booster Shots, Fauci Says
When in mid-December 2021, Dr. Anthony Fauci was asked if Americans should expect annual COVID boosters, he replied in the affirmative, saying that Americans will “just have to deal with” the prospect of getting boosters at regular intervals.15
So, in essence, Fauci wants us to accept that booster deficiency is the reason why the COVID-19 “pandemic” continues.
Clearly, that is not the case. The real reason COVID is still an issue is because Fauci and the medical establishment have suppressed viable early treatments.
If early treatment was the norm, COVID would rapidly become a distant memory.
As predicted over a year ago, we’re now on an injection treadmill with no end in sight, and every single dose carries the risk of serious side effects, up to and including permanent disability and death.
The only scientifically sound way out of this failed experiment is to stop. No more boosters.
Instead, the captured U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization to novel gene transfer technologies that don’t work like conventional vaccines in that they don’t prevent infection and spread, thus creating an evil cycle of new vaccine-resistant variants.
As demonstrated by James Lyons-Weiler (in a now broken weblink), the more we vaccinate, the higher the COVID caseload.

Weiler’s graph looks very much like that in a September 30, 2021, study16 in the European Journal of Epidemiology, which found that the higher the vaccination rate in a given area, the higher the COVID case rate.
Dr. Chris Martenson discusses this finding in the video below. As noted by Martenson, “the line goes the wrong way,” meaning the more heavily “vaccinated” a population is, the worse things get.
[embedded content]
Fortunately, it seems most Americans are starting to catch on, and so far, the fearmongering around Omicron has not resulted in a rush for boosters.17 According to an Axios/Ipsos poll conducted December 10 through December 13, 2021;
67 percent of unvaccinated respondents said Omicron makes no difference in their decision of whether to get vaccinated
19 percent said it makes them more likely
11 percent said it makes them less likely to get the shot.
Among respondents who already had received one or two doses;
59 percent said Omicron makes no difference in their decision to get a third dose;
36 percent said it makes them more likely
5 percent said it makes them less likely to get it.
Considering the shots have been shown to deregulate your immune function, it would be wise to “just say no” to further boosters. Should you develop symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, remember there are safe and effective early treatment protocols, including the I-MASK+18 and I-MATH+,19 protocols, which are available for download on the COVID Critical Care website in multiple languages.
See more here: technocracy.news
Bold emphasis added
Header image: Adobe Stock
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

A Cop With Brains and Integrity Exposes COVID Nonsense

Published on January 7, 2022Written by RCMP Corporal Richard Mehner

“The new “scariant” is Omicron. They don’t tell you that they skipped Mu and Xi in the Greek alphabet. Why? Because Mu or Xi just don’t sound scary.”

Since most members make a goodbye email before they leave, I figured I should as well, despite the “special” circumstances around my departure.
I’ve served in the RCMP for 21 years and one of the first things I said to any person I ever arrested was “you don’t have to say anything to me.” Unfortunately, our government has told me that I have to tell them what’s in my body, and if the right drug is not inside me, I have to get it as condition of my continuing employment, human rights be damned.
Anyways, my time here in the RCMP is up. For now. The low T wannabe tyrants in Ottawa have decided that I can no longer serve as a police officer because I refuse to tell them if I have submitted to their “vaccine” edict.
 
I was skeptical of the pandemic from the start but decided to wait and see what evidence would surface of this dangerous pandemic. So I sat back and quietly observed. At that time, I was the admin NCO on the watch. I was in the unique position of seeing every file that came through PRIME in the 46 hour window I was at work each week.
Naturally, this included all sudden death files. Pay attention now, have another sip of your latte if you have to. Since the pandemic began, until now, I was in a position to see every single sudden death file that came through our detachment area. What did I notice in this position?
Nothing. No upwards trend whatsoever.
Funny enough, I didn’t see people dropping dead in my neighbourhood either.
This was a very stark contrast to what I saw in media. A non-stop chorus on TV, radio, and internet, of case counts, hospitalizations and deaths. At no time in my life had I seen anything like it. A complete disconnect between my observed reality and that which was portrayed by my government and the government subsidized mainstream media.
And they were reporting deaths in care homes. Care homes? When did the media ever report deaths in care homes unless it was some sort of instance of gross negligence? It’s called end of life care for a reason. People go to care homes at the end of their life. Death is the natural consequence, and this fact used to be understood as common sense.
When the statistics started showing that the vast majority of anyone dying from Covid, either had one or more co-morbidities, or was older than the average life expectancy, my skepticism of the pandemic narrative only grew. Then in the summer of 2020, I got Covid. For a few days I was really tired and shivered a lot.

Then it was over. I survived the “deadly” disease like the vast majority of anyone else who caught it. To be honest, I’ve had worse plus, and worse hangovers.
At the end of 2020 I became convinced we were all being force fed a giant load of absolute bullshit. Don’t believe me? Look at world population statistics.
Here’s a sample. At the end of 2018, the world population was 7,631,091,040 and that year 57,625,149 people died. This showed an overall death rate of 0.76 percent.
I know some of you are shocked by this, but yes, 57 million people died of all types of causes in 2018. When you reach the end of your life, you die.
At the end of 2019, the world population was 7,713,468,100 and 58,394,378 died. Naturally, because we had more people reaching the end of their lives, more people died. The death rate that year was 0.76 percent.
Now let’s see what 2020 brought us. The year of the pandemic. At the end of 2020, the world population was 7,794,798,739 and 59,230,795 died. The death rate was 0.76 percent.
Yes. That’s right. In the year of the deadly pandemic the world’s population grew by 81,330,639 people and the death rate did not change by even a hundredth of a percent.

The media never once pulled back the lens to show this; they continued to show the narrow focus of case counts and Covid deaths. Even going so far as to change causes of death so that someone who died “with” Covid in their system was counted as someone who died “of” Covid. The Western world shut down over a disease about as deadly as the common flu.
And our rights were shut down along with it.
Despite this disease having a non existant effect on the overall death rate of the world’s population the call came out for a mass vaccination. Since I was already skeptical of the pandemic, I was naturally skeptical of the need for a “vaccine”. Oh look, vaccine is in quotations again. Why am I doing that?…
And now we are able to see much of the results of this mass vaccination campaign. And despite what you’ve been told, it’s not good. Data from the UK is showing that vaccinated adults under 60 are dying at twice the rate of the unvaccinated.
American VAERS data shows these Covid “vaccines” have caused more deaths than all other vaccines combined in the last 30 years.
In Europe, FIFA data has revealed a 500 percent increase in cardiac events and sudden deaths in soccer players. Very recently, the American Heart Association released a study which demonstrated that Mrna “vaccines” dramatically increase markers related to heart conditions.
A recent German study showed that the higher a jurisdictions’ vaccination rate, the higher it’s mortality rate.
On November 11th of this year, a Doctor Nagase came forward to report a record 13 still born births, in a 24 hour period, at BC Children’s hospital. They average 1 per month.
During a very recent Ontario provincial parliament debate, MP Rick Nicholls confronted the health minister about a sharp rise in still births from vaccinated pregnant women in Ontario. All he got for his efforts was deflection.

Despite this new evidence beginning to come light, there has been absolute silence in the media. Instead, they now want to vaccinate our children. Children are at a near zero risk from Covid.
Vaccinating children with these experimental drugs, with unknown long term side effects, which are starting to show increasing adverse effects, is absolutely criminal.
Since I refuse to go along with this coerced “vaccination” campaign, I am being forced onto Leave without pay. Despite the fact that approximately 70 percent of the Federal workforce gets testing as an option, for some inexplicable reason, the RCMP, the CBSA and Federal Corrections have a mandatory vaccination order.
I refuse to go along with this. This is nonsensical, illegal and unethical. I will continue to refuse and I have obtained legal representation, along with hundreds of other federal employees. We will get our day in court and we will win.
Some may ask where our union stands on the issue.
The answer is they didn’t. Our union leadership immediately bent the knee and offered no resistance whatsoever.
Despite these setbacks, those who are fighting this know we have the truth on our side. The truth, at the moment, may be mere pebbles rolling down a slope. This will inevitably become an avalanche. So in reality, this isn’t a goodbye email, it’s a “see you in 2022” email.
Before I go, let me say this. Don’t be afraid. The government, and their mouthpieces in the mainstream media, have promoted a nonstop campaign of fear for almost two years now.
Turn off your television and radios. Do your own research and question everything. Knowledge begins with asking questions.
With each new variant they will try and frighten you, despite the fact that never in the history of virology has a virus ever mutated to become more deadly.

Selective pressures always favour a more contagious, but less deadly mutation. The new “scariant” is Omicron. They don’t tell you that they skipped Mu and Xi in the Greek alphabet. Why? Because Mu or Xi just don’t sound scary.
When you hear some brain dead parrot repeat the talking point “trust the science,” politely ask them to provide a definition of science.
They never can because they don’t know. What they are really saying, but are too stupid to realize, is that they are saying “trust authority and don’t ask questions.”
This, my friends, is the antithesis of science.
Before I go, if any of you believe in courage and freedom. You aren’t alone. In fact, many members feel this way and they have created their own website: mounties4freedom.com. Another concerned group of freedom loving Canadians has created action4canada.com. Check them out when you have time.
Anyways, I have taken up too much of your time as it is. Always laugh at those who would spread fear, and see you in 2022.

See more here: henrymakow.com
Some bold emphasis added

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

A Pandemic of the Vaccinated

Published on January 4, 2022Written by thegatewaypundit.com

Two studies show new evidence that Covid-19 vaccines “cause more illness than they prevent”

Two newly released studies show that – after a brief period of moderate protection – the experimental Covid-19 vaccines actually end up causing more illness than they prevent – especially when it comes to new variants like the now-predominant, and highly-mild Omicron.
The first study, a pre-print that was released on MedRXiv by a team of researchers in Denmark, shows that the experimental vaccines provide absolutely zero protection against Omicron beginning two months after vaccination (which they refer to as “peak” protection).
After just three months, fully vaccinated individuals begin to experience sharp negative protection. Researchers found that those who received the Pfizer vaccine were an astounding 76.5 percent more likely to have a breakthrough infection than their unvaccinated counterparts once 90 days had passed – those who received Moderna’s were 39.3 percent more likely.
According to the study, the spread of the new Omicron variant was “likely” caused by “super-spreader events” “among young, vaccinated individuals.”
Only those who had taken a complete two-dose vaccination or a two-dose vaccination and a booster were counted as vaccinated in the study.
Somehow, the study’s authors still conclude that mass vaccination and the rollout of boosters is nessecary.
Take your booster, sheep.
Look:

I kid you not, the last line of the study is still “these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.”
— Ezra Levant 🍁 (@ezralevant) December 23, 2021

As if that wasn’t enough proof that this is the ‘pandemic of the vaccinated,’ the Canadian Covid Care Alliance – a non-profit government watchdog group of independent health care professionals – released a separate report this week that came to similar conclusions.
After examining Pfizer’s own vaccine clinical trial data, the CCCA team of experts also found that the Pfizer vaccine had serious negative protection against Covid, and so much so that they concluded the “vaccine causes more harm than good.”
The CCCA panel conducted a thorough analysis of Pfizer’s vaccine trial report from December 31st, 2020. The Pfizer report claims that the inoculations were safe and showed a robust 95% efficacy 7 days after the 2nd dose. But what researchers failed to mention was that the 95 percent was actually Relative Risk Reduction. Absolute Risk Reduction, which is what should have been factored in – especially if this vaccine is going to be mandated across the board, was less than one percent.
“The claim was that the inoculations were safe and showed 95 percent efficacy 7 days after the 2nd dose. But that 95 percent was actually Relative Risk Reduction. Absolute Risk Reduction was only 0.84 percent.”
For context, relative risk reductions only relate to a percentage reduction in one group compared to another, which can easily be misleading and over-exaggerate how helpful something is. Absolute risk reductions give the actual difference in risk between one group and another.
The report also shows that Pfizer had recorded an increased risk of illness – and even an increased risk of death – in individuals who had taken the vaccine compared to those who were in the placebo group – something that was also backed up by Pfizer’s latest clinical trial data that was published last month.
From CCCA:
“Pfizer’s most recent report indicates an Efficacy of 91.3 percent. (Which means a reduction in positive cases compared to placebo group.)
But it also showed, compared to the placebo group, an increase in illness and deaths.
There is no benefit to a reduction in cases if it comes at the cost of increased sickness and death.”
“Severe adverse events” were up by 75 percent in the trial group that had received the vaccine.
Overall, adverse events that were attributed to the vaccine were an astounding 300 percent higher than in the placebo group.

As for deaths, there were more who died in the vaccinated group – 20 out of 34 total. What’s even more concerning is that 9 of the vaccinated deaths were related to “cardiovascular events.

The CCCA panel also found several questionable and corrupt practices that were used when Pfizer compiled their report.
Not only did the vaccine maker downplay the side effects of the experimental jab, but they also did not follow established clinical trial protocols, had inadequate control groups that were mixed and unblinded early, and tested the jab on misleading demographics in order to generate the best results.

Instead of focusing the trials on the target population who could most benefit from a Covid-19 vaccine – a la the elderly and those with severe comorbidities – Pfizer chose participants from younger demographic that would be:
a) less likely to need a vaccine,
b) less likely to suffer an adverse event during a trial,
c) more likely to respond well to a vaccine, than the elderly who need protection against this virus.
Keep in mind, children and young adults have a whopping 99.995% recovery rate from this nominal virus. 

Additionally, because Pfizer unblinded their clinical trial groups early, they are unable to produce any relevant long-term safety data because they don’t have a control group for reference anymore.
By early 2021, nearly everyone in the study, even the placebo group, had been vaccinated, which effectively ended any hope for meaningful data.

In what’s probably a glowing testament to its credibility, Dr. Robert Malone – the inventor of the mRNA vaccine – was permanently kicked off of Twitter for sharing the CCCA report last week.
If it’s getting censored, you know they are over the mark.
See more here: thegatewaypundit.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

Understanding WHY Medical Tyranny Is Advancing so Rapidly Is the Key to Stopping It

Editor’s Commentary: As you read the article below by Dr. Anthony J. Hall, take note of all of the references he offers. Though the article itself is not excessively long, the links to other articles and videos are important to either explore now or save for later (though not much later). Many of us are […]
The post Understanding WHY Medical Tyranny Is Advancing so Rapidly Is the Key to Stopping It appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes.

Nurses Shared The TRUTH About The Increased Number Of Heart Problems And Strokes Among The Fully Vaccinated!

In South California, hospitals have a severe problem with the increased number of hospitalized vaccine-caused diseases, and they cannot pass unnoticed! Brave nurses raised their voices and shared the truth about what they had seen.
In Ventura County, LA, cases of unexplained strokes, heart problems, and heart issues are skyrocketing. The doctors don’t want to link these events with the C-19 vaccines.

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
One nurse at Ventura County ICU shared what she saw at the hospital and his concerns to the Conejo Guardian.
He was “tired of all the B.S that’s going on,” and the health officials only ignored this problem. The vaccines are harming the people; they aren’t helping them.
Sam said: “It’s crazy how nobody questions anything anymore.”

According to Sam, there was a huge surge in young people struggling with severe health problems after the process of vaccination.
“We’ve been having a lot of younger people come in,” Sam added. “We’re seeing a lot of strokes, a lot of heart attacks.”
One woman, at 38, struggled from blockages of blood flow in the brain.
“They [doctors] were searching for everything under the sun and documenting this in the chart, but nowhere do you see if she was vaccinated or not,” Sam stated.
“One thing the vaccine causes is thrombosis, clotting. Here you have a 38-year-old woman who was double-vaccinated, and she’s having strokes they can’t explain. None of the doctors relates it to the vaccine. It’s garbage. It’s absolute garbage.” He added.

Another patient at the age of 63, female, without previous cardiac history, had a heath attack, and the tests showed that the coronary arteries were clear. It’s critical to mention that she got the Moderna shot.
“One doctor actually questioned the vaccine, but they didn’t mention it in the chart because you can’t prove it,” Sam said.
Everyone wants to downplay it – ‘It’s rare, it’s rare,’” Sam said.
“Doctors don’t want to question it. We have these mass vaccinations happening, and we’re seeing myocarditis more frequently, and nobody wants to raise the red flag. When we discuss the case, they don’t even discuss it. They don’t mention it. They act like they don’t have a reason, that it’s spontaneous.”
Another ICU nurse, Dana, said the same. She has never been so busy.
“We don’t normally see this amount of strokes, aneurysms, and heart attacks all happening at once. Normally we’ll see six to ten aortic dissections a year. We’ve seen six in the last month. It’s crazy. Those have very high rates of mortality.” Dana said.
“I don’t understand how you can look at what’s going on and come up with just, ‘Yeah, it’s the holidays.’ There’s been a big change in everybody’s life, and it’s the vaccine.”
The majority of these patients are also fully vaccinated, according to the nurses.

Vaccine Billionaires and Human Guinea Pigs

Published on December 26, 2021Written by Colin Todhunter

How do you make a potentially dangerous and ineffective drug appear like a miracle of modern science? You could, for instance, enrol only certain people in clinical trials and exclude others or bring the study to a close as soon as you see a spike in the data that implies evidence of effectiveness.
There are many ways to do it.
According to health practitioner and writer Craig Stellpflug in his article ‘Big Pharma: Getting away with murder’ (2012), the strategy is to get in quick, design the study to get the result you want, get out fast and make lots of money.
Stellpflug says:
If a study comes up negative for your favorite drug, just don’t publish it! 68 per cent of all drug studies are swept under the carpet to keep those pesky side effects from being reported. Only 32 per cent of studies come up positive and a lot of those studies are ‘shortened’ to limit the long-term findings. Studies cut short were found to overestimate the study drug’s effectiveness and miss dangerous side effects and complications by an average of 30 per cent. This would explain the amazing 85 per cent drug study success rate in the hands of Big Pharma according to the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Of course, it helps to get the regulatory agencies on board and to convince the media and health officials of the need for your wonder product and its efficacy and safety. In the process, well-paid career scientists and ‘science’ effectively become shaped and led by corporate profit margins and political processes.
And what better way to make a financial killing than by making a mountain out of a molehill and calling it a ‘pandemic’?
COVID-19 vaccine concerns
The Wall Street Journal recently published an article by two health professors who said politics — not science — is behind the failure of health officials and the media to fully inform the public about the potential risks associated with COVID vaccines.
Although the article is available in full to subscribers only, the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) website provides an informative summary.
The CHD notes that Dr Joseph A Ladapo, associate professor of medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine, and Dr Harvey A Risch, professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, wrote that while prominent scientists have raised concerns that the safety risks of Covid-19 vaccines have been underestimated, the politics of vaccination has relegated their concerns to the outskirts of scientific thinking.
The two professors noted that clinical studies do not always tell the full story about the safety of medications and that the health effects often remain unknown until the medicine is rolled out to the general public. Examples include Vioxx, a pain reliever that increased the risk of heart attack and stroke; antidepressants that appeared to increase suicide attempts among young adults; and an influenza vaccine used in the 2009-10 swine flu epidemic that was suspected of causing febrile convulsions and narcolepsy in children.
The authors added that clinical trials often enroll patients who are not representative of the general population and more is learnt about drug safety from real-world evidence. With this in mind, they said the large clustering of side effects following COVID vaccines is concerning as is the silence around these potential signals of harm.
Serious adverse events reported by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System include low platelets, heart inflammation, deep-vein thrombosis and death. However, the two scientists argue this is likely to be a fraction of the total number of adverse events.
They criticise the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for ignoring the reported serious COVID vaccine side effects.
The authors acknowledge the risks of COVID vaccines in certain populations, not least children, may outweigh the benefits. They also state that not a single published study has demonstrated that patients with a prior infection benefit from COVID-19 vaccination. Something which is not readily acknowledged by the CDC or Anthony Fauci, an indication, according to the authors, of how deeply entangled pandemic politics is in science.
They conclude that public health authorities are making a mistake and risking public erosion of trust by not being forthcoming about the possibility of harm from the vaccines.
Merck and Vioxx
It is revealing that the two scientists refer to Vioxx, which was once popular for treating the symptoms of arthritis. It was removed from the market in 2004 after concerns that it may have injured hundreds of thousands of patients, while possibly killing tens of thousands in the US.
Dr David Graham, whistleblower and senior FDA investigator, criticised the FDA’s approval process of Vioxx (rofecoxib), an anti-inflammatory drug administered orally. In various interviews and congressional hearings, he described the outcome of Vioxx as disastrous and unparalleled in the history of the US. He added that the saga surrounding Vioxx had constituted an unprecedented failure of the nation’s system of drug approval and oversight.
In 2004, Graham argued that the painkiller had caused 88,000 to 139,000 heart attacks in the US – 30-40 per cent of which were fatal – over the previous five years. Nevertheless, manufactured by Monsanto (a company with a proven track record of corrupt practices) and co-marketed by Merck, Vioxx became a leading drug in providing pain relief from the symptoms of various forms of arthritis.
Research presented to the FDA in early 2001 showed that patients taking Vioxx had a higher risk of heart attack compared to those taking some of the older alternatives.
However, the real game-changer came in 2004 when Dr Graham released the findings that found Vioxx increased the chance of heart attack and death from cardiac arrest significantly more than its biggest rival on the market. Dosages of Vioxx in excess of the recommended daily dose of 25 milligrams were also found to more than triple a patient’s risk compared to those who had not taken painkillers.
In September 2004, Vioxx was pulled from the market. But in 2006, more damning findings were revealed by a study that showed that some patients had likely suffered from a heart attack much sooner after starting treatment with Vioxx. Appearing in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, the study showed that 25 per cent of the patients who had heart attacks while taking Vioxx did so within two weeks of starting the drug. This indicated that Vioxx-related cardiovascular risks may occur much earlier than previously thought.
The FDA was criticised for its close relationship with Merck and witnesses at a senate finance committee hearing described how danger signals of Vioxx went ignored. Indeed, a 2007 article published by the National Institutes of Health alleged that even though scientists at Merck knew that the drug might adversely affect the cardiovascular system, none of the intervention studies submitted to the FDA in 1998 were designed to evaluate such risk.
Robber barons and guinea pigs
Merck reported over $11 billion in Vioxx sales during the five years the drug was on the market. To date, the company has paid nearly $6 billion in litigation settlements and criminal fines over Vioxx. Still, in hard-nosed commercial terms, it was a massive success, resulting in a $5 billion gain for the company.
In May 2021, it was reported that Covid-19 vaccines had created at least nine new billionaires. According to research by the People’s Vaccine Alliance, the new billionaires included Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel and Ugur Sahin, the CEO of BioNTech, which has produced a vaccine with Pfizer. Both CEOs were then worth around $4 billion. Senior executives from China’s CanSino Biologics and early investors in Moderna have also become billionaires.
Although the nine new billionaires are worth a combined $19.3 billion, the vaccines were largely funded by public money. For instance, according to a May 2021 report by CNN, BioNTech received €325 million from the German government for the development of the vaccine. The company made a net profit of €1.1 billion in the first three months of the year, largely thanks to its share of sales from the Covid-19 vaccine, compared with a loss of €53.4 million for the same period last year.
Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine sales reached $1.7 billion in the first three months of this year and it had its first profitable quarter ever. Moderna is expected to make $13.2 billion in Covid-19 vaccine revenue in 2021. The company received billions of dollars in funding from the US government for development of its vaccine.
Big Pharma has every reason to perpetuate the notion of a deadly global pandemic and to inflate the efficacy of and need for its vaccines. And it, along with its associates in government and at the WHO, has every reason to discredit alternative and arguably more effective treatments like Ivermectin (see the online article ‘The Campaign against Ivermectin: WHO’s Chief Scientist Served with Legal Notice for Disinformation and Suppression of Evidence‘).
There is no need to cover ground here that has been covered extensively elsewhere but it is now abundantly clear that many continue to question the overall official COVID-19 narrative, the fear propaganda, the specific data, the PCR testing protocols, the apparent conflicts of interest and vaccine efficacy.
Moreover, a group of 57 leading scientists, doctors and policy experts recently released a report calling in to question the safety and efficacy of the current Covid-19 vaccines. They are calling for an immediate end to all vaccine programmes.
There are hundreds of scientists who have questioned government and WHO strategy and who have brought attention to the extremely low risks posed by COVID to the bulk of the population as well as the destructive (ineffective) policies and decisions pertaining to lockdowns and other restrictions.
There are many other top scientists who are questioning the need for mass vaccination and who have also pointed out credible and extremely disturbing side effects (real and potential) of such a strategy, not least Dr Robert Malone, credited with developing mRNA vaccine technology, Dr Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist, and Dr Geert Vanden Bossche, a prominent virologist and vaccine expert.
Unlike Merck and Vioxx, it will be governments (the public) that foot any future indemnity costs of these experimental vaccines that have escaped proper (long-term) testing. And given the scale of the rollout, the damage caused could make the adverse effects of Vioxx seem a mere blip.
Vaccines that were brought to market via emergency authorisation use for an ‘emergency’ constructed on the basis of deaths so often wrongly attributed to COVID-19.  Brought to market on the basis of flawed PCR test protocols with magnification cycles primed to create a ‘casedemic’.
To borrow from Dr David Graham: are we currently witnessing something more disastrous and unparalleled in the history of the world, let alone the US: an unprecedented failure of global drug approval and oversight?
In the meantime, while billions of vaccinated people serve as human guinea pigs, the newly crowned vaccine kings will make hay while the sun shines (and the fear continues).

Colin Todhunter specialises in development, food and agriculture and is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization in Montreal Read other articles by Colin.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

Fatalities Linked to “Specific Batches” of the Covid-19 Vaccine

Published on December 23, 2021Written by unz.com

“Dr. Fauci is likely responsible for a preponderance of the total 802,000 US Covid deaths….

It was Dr. Fauci who organized the suppression of easily marshaled and inexpensive early treatments… Fauci who promoted the protocol of sending sick patients home from the ER without any treatment … Fauci who is responsible for the emergency use authorization on the mRNA “vaccines” that may have killed hundreds of thousands more Americans… And .. Fauci who wants to vaxx up all the children in America, despite evidence that the mRNA shots permanently disable children’s innate natural immune systems and can cause lasting heart, blood vessel, brain, and reproductive damage…” James Howard Kunstler, “Where Do You Stand?”
Question– Can the deaths that are reported on VAERS be linked to specific batches of the Covid-19 vaccine?
Answer– Yes, they can.
Question– Are you sure of that? What you’re suggesting is that particular lots of the vaccine are toxic.
Answer– That appears to be the case.
Question– I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying: Are you accusing the drug companies of murder?
Answer– That possibility can’t be ruled out, although it cannot yet be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Not surprisingly, however, neither industry leaders, regulators or the FBI have shown the slightest interest in examining the evidence that has been meticulously compiled by reputable researchers.
The fact is, there is already sufficient statistical evidence that something very sinister is going on that requires an immediate and thorough investigation. It’s a matter of gravest concern, after all, people are dying.
Question– I’m still can’t believe what you’re saying. Do you really think that corporations kill for money?
Answer– Have you ever heard of Vioxx, Paxil or Oxycodone or have you been living under a rock for the last 40 years? Are you at all familiar with the abysmal record of these serial felons that masquerade as respectable pharmaceutical companies but have inflicted horrible suffering and injury on the population?
Yes, I realize that liberals love these drug companies and believe they operate with the purest of intentions, but I’m telling you that they’d cut your heart out in a split-second if they thought it would fatten their bottom line. I suggest you expand your reading and figure it out for yourself.
Question– Let’s cut to the chase: What proof do you have that the drug companies are deliberately distributing these “toxic” batches of vaccines?
Answer– Wait a minute: What I’m saying is there’s enough evidence to warrant an investigation. I’m also saying that if industry shills, like Fauci, were really on the up-an-up, they’d temporarily halt the vaccination campaign until this business is sorted out. Now check out this blurb from The Expose’:

“An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.
But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.” (“EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data”, The Expose)

“The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.” (The Expose’)
Think about that for a minute. The “deadly” vaccines were widely distributed across the US but they’re all identifiable by a simple lot number. That’s astonishing, don’t you think? So, we know that specific lot numbers are killing and injuring people but Fauci and Co. still haven’t alerted the public, notified the FBI, called for an investigation or stopped the vaccination campaign.
Why? And why is the media ignoring this story? If they were genuinely interested in saving lives, this would be headline news, wouldn’t it?
Question– But that’s all just speculation. You still have not produced a lick of evidence to back your claims.
Answer– You’re right. So far, it’s all just theory, so let’s get back to the article:

“Scientists compared variability between Flu vaccine lots with variability between Covid vaccine lots, and were shocked to find EXCESSIVE and HIGHLY UNUSUAL degree of variation between different lots of the Covid vaccines. When 22,000 flu vaccine lots were examined, almost all of them produced 5 or fewer severe adverse reactions per lot…
When the same number of Covid vaccines were compared, there was found to be huge variation – with many lots producing 5 or fewer severe adverse reactions , but many others producing 1000-5000 severe adverse reactions.” (The Expose’)

How does that happen? How does one batch generate almost zero adverse reactions and another batch generates 1,000-times that amount? Is it just a quality control issue or is there more here that meets the eye?
And this is not a trivial matter since it appears that these particular batches may be responsible for the bulk of the 20,000 fatalities listed on the VAERS reporting system. Also, as the author points out:

“Under FDA regulations, such high variation between different lots and between different manufacturers means the drugs are ADULTERATED, and carries significant legal penalties. Such variation may also negate EUA authorization – which is only granted based on consistency of the product.” (The Expose’)

Question– I agree that it’s all very concerning, but you still haven’t produced any hard evidence yet. Show me the proof of wrongdoing or admit that you’re jumping the gun.
Answer– Look; we’re building a case here without access to the labs where these vaccines were manufactured and without access to any forensic evidence whatsoever. The best we can do is provide circumstantial and statistical evidence that a thorough investigation is warranted. Got it? We don’t have a smoking gun.
What we have is compelling evidence that something very sinister is going on. People are dying and their deaths are directly connected to specific vaccine lots that can be positively identified and traced back to their source. Isn’t that enough to justify an independent probe?
I think it is but, naturally, the people who have something to hide are not going to support an investigation.
Now, get a load of this video that gives an excellent rundown of what we’re dealing with. The whole thing is worth watching, but for our purposes, we’ll focus on minute 14: 35. Here’s what they say:

“With 2,244 batches shown on the graph, 40 percent had only 1 adverse reaction, whereas the top 20 percent were causing over 1,000 adverse reactions per batch… Which shows that the top 20 percent is 1,000 times worse than the bottom 40 percent.” That’s exactly correct. Only a small percentage of lots are causing almost 100 percent of adverse events and deaths in our data sets.. There can be 1,000 percent difference in the experience of someone who gets a shot from one lot, than from someone who gets a shot from another.” It’s a very disturbing situation, no product should be varying like this when it is being given to masses of otherwise healthy people, (including) pregnant women and children. We are exposing them to a gigantic amount of risk. …
…People who think (these vaccines ) are safe and effective like all the traditional vaccines you are familiar with, you should think again, because this variability exposes a large number of people to excessive risk.
…Sometime manufacturers are exempt from good manufacturing practices if the FDA deems it is a public health emergency, but in that case, the public should be aware of what they are taking. They should not be equating these injections to traditional vaccines.” (“Covid 19 Vaccines by Lot Number”, Bitchute)

Answer– Allow me to state the obvious: “1,000 percent difference” is more than a rounding error. It suggests that certain lots are contaminated even though they are still being used. That is flat-out scary.
Also, while this analysis does not prove a criminal conspiracy, it certainly strengthens the case for those who– like myself– believe that that’s exactly what’s going on, a conspiracy. Naturally, any depopulation scheme would have to appear randomized and sporadic. Such a scheme would not play out in a year or even two years, but over the course of a decade or more.
Vaccines would play a critical role in that scheme as they provide direct access to the physical biology of all 7 billion people on earth. A small portion of those people would die shortly after inoculation, which is what we are seeing here.
The vast majority of fatalities, however, would only show up in the excess mortality data which has been steadily rising in all the countries that launched mass vaccination campaigns earlier in the year. The trajectory of these excess deaths suggest that the depopulation agenda will only be achieved over a protracted period of time, perhaps, a decade or more.
What that shows, is that –while our rulers may be evil– they’re not stupid, in fact, they are disturbingly calculating. Here’s how analyst Steve Kirsch summed it up on his Substack account:
“It is exceptionally clear that criminal activity within the vaccine community has caused an adulteration of one percent of the vaccine batches, which is why overall we get such poor results…. This is exceptionally clear when you see that about 99 percent of the vaccine batches produce typically 0-3 adverse events in the VAERS database, whilst the other one percent produce typically hundreds to many-thousands of AE (Adverse Events), including almost all of the deaths and serious disabilities, which aren’t present in the other 99 percent.”
Repeat: “Criminal activity… has caused an adulteration of one percent of the vaccine batches.”
As former Pfizer VP Mike Yeadon points out in another post, there are only two options we need to consider regarding this matter. Either:

1. No one noticed. (Not the manufacturers, nor FDA, nor CDC, HHS, insurers etc.)
2. (Or) They know. (what’s going on, that is.)

Which is it?
Yeadon concludes that it would be impossible for the people in charge NOT to know. So, yes, they DO know; they know there are “adulterated” batches that are killing and injuring people, just as they know they’re not going to do anything that would rock the boat and change the ultimate outcome. So, the fatalities will continue to mount; that’s what we’re left with. Here’s more from Yeadon:

“Given VAERS is publicly accessible & is specified as a tool for detecting the unexpected, there must be someone in a three-letter agency tasked with monitoring VAERS…. The he adds this, “I don’t care what your general view is of vaccines broadly or covid19 vaccines specifically, you cannot accept this huge degree of output vaccination from lot to lot. It’s injected Russian roulette.”

Not surprisingly, that’s the term that keeps popping up everywhere: “Russian roulette”; spin the chamber and hope you don’t blow your brains out. Is it too much to expect that vaccination should be more than a (potentially) life-ending roll-of-the-dice? Is that too much to ask?
Question– This might surprise you, but I actually agree with you for once. I think it would be perfectly reasonable for people to check the lot number before they get vaccinated. But I don’t agree with your other wild assumptions which I think are totally off-base.
Answer– Fair enough. But I should mention that I was just as skeptical as you when I first read the article. I just couldn’t imagine that there could be a such a huge discrepancy between vaccines that are supposed to be identical. Now we see that they’re not identical, not even close. The differences are humongous and deadly.
Which brings us to our next question: Is it intentional? If these lots are responsible for most of the vaccine-generated deaths on VAERS, and if there is up-to “1,000 to 1” difference in adverse events between these and the other batches; then we need to know whether or not this was done deliberately or not. So, is it all a big mistake or are we looking at premeditated murder?
Question– There you go again, stretching the facts to fit your theory. I still think there could be more benign explanation.
Answer– Let me get this straight: This analysis identifies certain batches of vaccines as a thousand-times more lethal than other batches, but you think there is a “benign explanation” for that? Please, tell me what that explanation might be?
Question– I don’t know off-hand. I’d have to think about it for a while. But I don’t think jumping to conclusions gets us any closer to the truth.
Answer– I wouldn’t call statistical analysis “jumping to conclusions”, but that’s your call. Anyway, let’s skip the debate and get back to the article:

“But the investigation of VAERS data also revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were again only associated with certain batches of the jab. The chart above shows that 96 percent of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just four percent of the lots of Pfizer vaccine.
Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each….
The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just five percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine.
Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths….This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people.” (The Expose’)

Answer– So, the same weird pattern applies to both major vaccine producers, but you still think there’s a “benign explanation”, right?
Question– Right.
Answer– And, even though “deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified”, you don’t think they were deliberately distributed across the country?
Question– No, I don’t.
Answer– So, it’s all just a “big accident” by well-meaning people doing their best in very trying circumstances, right?
Question– Yes.
Answer– And the fact that no one is investigating this situation– that continues to cause death and injury– is just a bureaucratic snafu of some kind, right?
Question– Right.
Answer– I think you’re in denial. That’s all. I think you’re so attached to your own view that you refuse to see what is going on right beneath your nose. My guess is that if Anthony Fauci ordered the summary execution of all 60 million Americans who refuse to get vaccinated, you’d come up with some excuse for him. You’d say “That’s okay, he’s just doing his job, he’s just fighting Covid.”
That’s true, isn’t it?
Question– You always exaggerate.
Answer– One last thing: Do you know what the “perfect crime” is? The “perfect crime” is one in which there is no evidentiary link between the perpetrator and the victim. No proof, no apparent motive and no smoking gun. The plan to exterminate millions of people with toxic vaccines was supposed to be the perfect crime.
But, guess what? Someone slipped up and we now have the lot numbers. That’s right, the lot numbers. Someone carelessly left their fingerprints on the murder weapon and, now, all we have to do is track him down and bring him to justice.
It’s not much, but it’s a step in the right direction.
See more here: unz.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

High-ranking French Vaccination Pope: “Vaccinated people should be quarantined and isolated from society.”

The UK Column channel recently had the opportunity to interview leading French vaccine expert Professor Christian…
The post High-ranking French Vaccination Pope: “Vaccinated people should be quarantined and isolated from society.” appeared first on GreatReject.

>