Full Facts & Figures from Doctors & Scientists On COVID19

Published on October 14, 2021Written by kathydopp.info

Scientists and Doctors Warn Against Investigational EUA COVID-19 Vaccines

Introduction (See below for doctors & scientists’ messages.)
Doctors for COVID Ethics Letters to Health Agencies.  Scientists have found the synthetic spike proteins in COVID vaccines are more dangerous than in naturally-occurring SARS-COV-2 infections to susceptible persons because:

COVID-19 victims die from cytokine storms when the body’s immune system attacks the body’s organs.  Vaccines can cause antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), a quicker cytokine storm, i.e., more severe illness, when a vaccinated person is next exposed to a wild virus. Prior attempts to develop coronavirus vaccines killed test animals or made them severely ill when subsequently encountering the wild virus. ADE occurs more in elderly or high-risk persons, in persons who had previous influenza vaccines or previously recovered from a SARS-COV-2 infection. Informed consent requires disclosing ADE risk;
mRNA and the vector COVID vaccines are “leaky ” i.e., do not stop infection or transmission.  In a Geert Bossche warned of deaths from mass corona vaccinations (Epoch Times March 2021) because leaky vaccines cause immune escape — the mutation and spread of more infectious viral variants.  In May, world-reknowned Nobel laureate virologist Luc Montagnier warned COVID vaccination is creating new variants. Vaccinated persons become spreaders of more infectious mutations of SARS-COV-2.  The more people vaccinated, the higher the risk of evolving strains.  There is evidence of vaccinated spreaders and an increase in serious COVID cases among the young, e.g. in Israel. “Break-through” cases are occurring in fully vaccinated people worldwide. E.g., Florida;
The lipid nano-particles (LNP)s cause human cells to manufacture synthetic spike proteins throughout the body that are more pathogentic than the original SARS-COV-2 spike protein, quickly spreading in greater numbers inside the body than a natural infection; causing, often, a large bump in excess mortality concomidant with vaccination rollouts.  The spike protein may invade brain tissue, infecting neurons and causing neurotropism.  The S1 sub-unit of the spike protein enters the parenchymal tissue of the brain in murine models. The brain’s endothelial cells attempt to hide the spike protein in the brain capillary glycocalyx, which can lead to degradation of the glycocalyx, dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and cerebral edema. (citation);
The polyethylene glycol, PEG, encasing the lipid nano-particles in the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, causes severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis in some persons;
Risks of blood coagulation and clotting (thrombosis) or Covid vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, or VITT is caused by synthetic spike proteins growing in the lungs, heart, ovaries, brain, liver, kidneys, bone marrow, testes, and other organs  disabling the body’s ACE-2 receptors…  The spike proteins bind to endothelial cells lining blood vessels. … causing platelets to clot in a majority of vaccine recipients… and may cause bleeding disorders …and heart problems. … and … cause neurological damage and clots in the brain. (citation). Doctors have reported seeing rapid development of advanced cancers occurring post-Covid vaccination in liver, lungs, and bones.
The Covid mRNA and DNA vaccines do not provide mucosal immunity that  would prevent infection and spread of COVID disease.  (see Mucosal Immunity in COVID-19: A Neglected but Critical Aspect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection  by Michael W. Russell, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States, Zina Moldoveanu, Pearay L. Ogra, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States and Jiri Mestecky, Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States  30 November 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.611337 )   The mucosal immune system is the largest component of the human immune system, … providing protection at the main sites of infectious threat: the mucosael barriers. As SARS-CoV-2 initially infects the upper respiratory tract, its first interactions with the immune system is predominantly at respiratory mucosal surfaces…

Some doctors recommend isolating for up to 30 days after a COVID injection to avoid harming others while shedding pathogenic spike proteins; to avoid getting a SARS-COV-2 infection during first two weeks post-vaccination when the immune system is vulnerable; and, to take preventative measures.  See  COVID “vaccine” adverse events.
What Doctors & Scientists are Saying

“We knew these vaccines would kill people.”
By lying about safe remedies like Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine,, governments have committed “mass murder.”
“Don’t be afraid of COVID or ‘variants.’ Be terrified of your government.”
“These are not ‘slip-ups’, ‘well-intentioned mistakes’…They’re deliberately misleading.”

The COVID shot vs. Alternative Treatment. October 11, 2021. Dr. Zelenko is a board-certified family physician with over 20 years of experience. He is published in top peer reviewed journals with world renowned physicians. He’s the first in the world to develop therapeutics against COVID. He has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize and has been recognized as a hero at a Department of Homeland Security committee hearing.
Geert V. Bossche: Keep Asking the Wrong Questions and We’ll Never Tame this Pandemic  October 10, 2021.
Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? Oct 7, 2021. Ronald N.Kostoffa, Daniela Calinab, Darja Kanducc, Michael B.Briggs, Panayiotis Vlachoyiannopoulose, Andrey A. Svistunovf, Aristidis Tsatsakisg   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010  A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.
audio podcast: Covid Vaccine & Kids part 2: with Dr. Paul Alexander. October 7, 2021.
‘We’re in the middle of a major biological catastrophe’: COVID expert Dr. Peter McCullough. October 6, 2021. In a recent lecture, Dr. Peter McCullough presented alarming data related to COVID vaccines, the fraud of national health authorities, the ‘Therapeutic Nihilism’ being exercised in hospitals, and the urgent necessity of active resistance.    There is no data safety monitoring board (DSM) overseeing this COVID vaccine rollout.
Israeli Data Favor Higher Estimates of Post-Vax Myocarditis — Results echo the controversial VAERS study from September MedPage Today October 6, 2021. For patients in Israel’s largest healthcare system, Clalit Health Services, the estimate of myocarditis was 2.13 cases per 100,000 vaccinated persons, reaching as high as 10.69 cases per 100,000 in men and boys ages 16 to 29.
The unforgivable sin! G. Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD October 2021 … “As the mechanism of immune defense in vaccinees is totally different from the one at play in unvaccinated individuals, the mantra of mass vaccination stakeholders that vaccination of youngsters and children will provide them with improved protection from contracting severe disease is a textbook example of scientific nonsense.
Their irrational, erroneous extrapolations lead people to believe that they should get their children vaccinated whereas there is barely any more catastrophic immune intervention one could think of.  …  healthy children and youngsters are NOT ‘naturally’ susceptible to any Sars-CoV-2 lineage but exclusively acquire such susceptibility as a direct consequence of functional suppression of their well-established innate immune capacity due to a rapid re-exposure event or, even much worse and long-lived, due to vaccination.
The likelihood of rapid re-exposure to Sars-CoV-2 after previous infection dramatically increases when highly infectious variants expand in prevalence. Such an expansion in prevalence directly results from mass vaccination campaigns as mass vaccination turns vaccinees into an excellent breeding ground for naturally selected S-directed immune escape variants.”
10/05/21.  Pro-vax John Campell, Ph.D. says COVID Vaccines Are Being Administered Incorrectly, Expert Tells Jimmy Dore  Incorrect injection techniques being recommended by the CDC, WHO and vaccine manufacturers are increasing post-vaccine blood clotting and damages to the brain, lungs, and heart.  Other videos: Inadvertant intravenous injections and  Aspiration, more information        See these two papers:

Intravenous Injection of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA Vaccine Can Induce Acute Myopericarditis in Mouse Model. August 18, 2021. Can Li, Yanxia Chen, Yan Zhao, David Christopher Lung, Zhanhong Ye, Wenchen Song, Fei-Fei Liu, Jian-Piao Cai, Wan-Man Wong, Cyril Chik-Yan Yip  The histological changes of myopericarditis after the first IV-priming dose persisted for 2 weeks and were markedly aggravated by a second IM- or IV-booster dose. … Conclusions:  This study provided in vivo evidence that inadvertent intravenous injection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines may induce myopericarditis. Brief withdrawal of syringe plunger to exclude blood aspiration may be one possible way to reduce such risk. And see this study: 
Thrombocytopenia and splenic platelet directed immune responses after intravenous ChAdOx1 nCov-19 administration. June 29, 2021 Leo Nicolai, View ORCID ProfileAlexander Leunig, Kami Pekayvaz, Afra Anjum, Eva Riedlinger, Luke Eivers, Marie-Louise Hoffknecht, Dario Rossaro, Raphael Escaig, Rainer Kaiser, Vivien Polewka, Anna Titova, Karsten Spiekermann, Matteo Iannacone, Konstantin Stark, Steffen Massberg.  doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.29.450356

Dr. Richard Fleming, MD, PhD, JD, who has studied spike proteins in his research since the 1990’s and explains beginning at the 2:14:30 mark how the harm is done and will continue to worsen.   October 2, 2021.  The first part of Dr. Fleming’s talk begins at roughly the 1:25:30 mark and explains how these mRNA gene technologies work, as well as the misleading statistics that were used in the media propaganda to promote the gene technology injections to the public, fooling even medical doctors who are too busy to delve into the details of the statistical analyses.
My Jaw DROPPED when I Tested Someone’s Immune System After the 2nd mRNA Jab.  By Dr. Nathan Thompson What does the mRNA COVID vaccine do to the human immune system? Sep 28, 2021.
Vaccine Immune Interations and the Booster Shots By Doctors for COVID Ethics. How and why Covid-19 vaccines incite immunological attack on blood vessel walls.  By now, most people know COVID-19 vaccines can cause blood clotting and bleeding. Some readers may be aware that reports of death following COVID-19 vaccination outnumber those for all vaccines combined since records began, 31 years ago, in the official US database VAERS. Eminent independent scientists and researchers in the fields of immunology and microbiology have been writing to medical regulators since early 2021 [3], warning of vaccine-related blood clotting and bleeding, including that the official data on blood abnormalities post-vaccination likely represent “just the tip of a huge iceberg”
A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products JessicaRose PhD, MSc, BSc1. Peter A.McCulloughMD, MPH1 October 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.101011 Myocarditis rates reported in VAERS were significantly higher in youths between the ages of 13 to 23 (p

Pfizer Official Confessed That Their Vaccine Isn’t FDA Approved! [WATCH]

Regarding the C-19 vaccine, there is a number of information thrown at the people, so they can’t understand a thing!
The Dems and Joe Biden still promote the mass vaccination, stating that it is safe for use and approved by the FDA.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
The reality is that the side effects overweight the benefits, but their number is still unknown. Because of this, the FDA can’t approve the vaccine.
Recently, Senator Ron Johnson claimed that the U.S. doesn’t have an FDA-approved vaccine because the Pfizer vaccine doesn’t have the approval.
He said: “We do not have an FDA-approved vaccine being administered in the U.S. The FDA played a bait and switch. They approved the Comirnaty version of Pfizer drugs. It’s not available in the U.S. They even admit it. I sent them a letter three days later going “What are you doing?” What they did is they extended the emergency use authorization for the Pfizer drug vaccine that’s available in the U.S. Here that’s more than 30 days later, they haven’t asked that very simple question. If you’re saying that the Pfizer drug is the same as the Comirnaty, why didn’t you provide FDA approval on that? So, there’s not an FDA-approved drug, and, of course, they announced it so they could push through these mandates so that people actually think, “Oh, OK, now these things are FDA approved.” They are not, and again, maybe they should be, but the FDA isn’t telling me why.”

His claim was shocking, and the liberals didn’t know how to bury it. The White House promoted the massive vaccination even more. However, now Jennifer Bridges, a registered nurse fired due to the vaccine mandated, called Pfizer to confirm their FDA approval.

Source

Red Voice Media TV Gab

BBC Double Down in Gaslighting Ivermectin COVID Treatment

Published on October 7, 2021Written by John O’Sullivan

Latest BBC Ivermectin hit piece is exposed lying by omission and cherry-picking handfuls of errors from studies on the efficacy of Ivermectin on COVID19. The once trusted news service sells out shamelessly to vaccine tyranny.

Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid ‘miracle’ drug (Rachel Schraer & Jack Goodman) published on the BBC website (October 07, 2021) will be evidence cited at the Nuremberg 2.0 criminals trials among the prosecutor’s Exhibits to show how a once respected global news source tried and failed to distract from an avalanche of medical evidence vindicating Ivermectin’s triumphant victory over the ‘deadly’ novel coronavirus.
Rather than chancing their lives to Big Pharma’s expensive and experimental vaccines, filled with dubious and toxic ingredients, literally millions worldwide are seeing COVID19 eradicated from their communities by a cheap, re-purposed and reliable treatment: Ivermectin.
The Beeb article is subtle in its deceptiveness and seeks to reassure readers that the scientists relied on in their story are impartial, unbiased and objective:
“The scientists in the group – Dr Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Dr James Heathers, Dr Nick Brown and Dr Sheldrick – each have a track record of exposing dodgy science. They’ve been working together remotely on an informal and voluntary basis during the pandemic.”
The story continues:
“They formed a group looking deeper into ivermectin studies after biomedical student Jack Lawrence spotted problems with an influential study from Egypt. Among other issues, it contained patients who turned out to have died before the trial started. It has now been retracted by the journal that published it.”
The article is a bait and switch – shifting focus away from the bad news of adverse events from the rushed through experimental ‘vaccines’ and onto instilling doubts about alternatives to the jab. The authors want your attention, instead, on the more arcane and less fathomable world of controlled trials. The piece explains:
“The group of independent scientists examined virtually every randomised controlled trial (RCT) on ivermectin and Covid” and that “RCT’s involve people being randomly chosen to receive either the drug which is being tested or a placebo – a dummy drug with no active properties.”
So, just like with the pandemic where a handful of deaths means disproportionate reactionary policies taking away personal choice, we are subtly (and unwittingly) persuaded by minutiae (small and often not important details). The emphasis added by this author:
“The team also looked at six particularly influential observational trials.”
“Out of a total of 26 studies examined, there was evidence in five that the data may have been faked.”
“In a further five there were major red flags.”
“On top of these flawed trials, there were 14 authors of studies who failed to send data back.”
Here we see an argument where readers are being led astray from the Big Picture – the events that occurred in India in recent months in the biggest medical trial yet undertaken on the efficacy of Ivermectin.
If you are foolish enough to only rely on discredited news broadcasters like the BBC you will be unaware of the pandemic game changer that is India (population: 1.39 billion)
A very big number versus a gaggle of smaller numbers. But what is the significance?
The sheeple who only rely on the mainstream for their news won’t know that India went all in for Ivermectin to fight the pandemic.
How did that work out for India?
Well, any diligent reader can verify for themselves from India’s more reliable news media the facts. The Hindustan Times reported (September 10, 2021) widespread use of Ivermectin has been so successful that:
“There are no active cases of the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) in 33 districts of Uttar Pradesh, the state government informed on Friday. About 67 districts have not reported a single new case of the viral infection in the last 24 hours, the government said, noting the steady improvement of the Covid-19 situation in the state.” [1]

Principia Scientific International looked to the primary news sources in the sub continent to check the facts. Something BBC ‘journalists’ are unwilling/reluctant to do.
Meanwhile, the BBC bias steadfastly refers only to ‘trials’ and the ‘reliable source’ for their attack on Ivermectin.
It a provable fact that governmental agencies, local and national media – both mainstream and alternative – concur that the 33 districts in Uttar Pradesh, India are now “COVID free.” This state has an estimated population of 241 million people in 2021 and has the highest population in India.
This is almost two-thirds of the United States population in 2021 and yet it is now a COVID-19 free nation.
India Today also reported:
“The active caseload in Uttar Pradesh is down to 269, while the percentage of active cases against the total confirmed cases is 0 per cent.
The active caseload, which was at a high of 3,10,783 in April, has reduced by over 99 per cent.
Fresh Covid-19 cases in the state have remained below 100 for 50 consecutive days. Of the 1,87,638 samples tested in the last 24 hours, 21 tested positive. In the same period, another 17 patients recovered from the infection, adding to the recovery of over 16,86,182 people so far. (These numbers are in lakh so the comma placement is different in the US. 1,87,638 lakh is 187,638).”
These numbers are staggering and make a mockery of the few dozen citations provided in the BBC scare story.
Crucially, so many non-First World countries are reporting successes (and low COVID infection/deaths) while top tier economic nations, such the United Kingdom and Israel – with 80 percent or higher mass vaccination rates –  having HIGHER mortality rates.
The More Israel Doubled Down On COVID, The Worse Things Got.
Israel Is Now The World’s Covid Hotspot
India chose not to follow the UK and Israel into an insane mass vaccination policy.
So, contrast and compare the worrying reports pumped out by the Beeb daily from London with those coming from India’s local government records showing the recovery rate has increased up to 98.7 percent. Thus proving the dubiousness of the ‘vaccines’ and the effectiveness of IVERMECTIN as part of the “Uttar Pradesh Covid Control Model.”
Principia Scientific’s renowned lab testing expert, Dr Saeed Qureshi further revealed the depths of misdirection and fraud in play throughout this “global pandemic” by warning:
“The virus has never been isolated or tested to be the cause of the illness (COVID). Therefore, the cause of the alleged pandemic can’t be a virus. Now considering non-viral treatment, particularly Ivermectin, indirectly provides strong evidence that illness is not from a virus but a parasitic one. Therefore, the focus should be on appropriately identifying the illness and treating it with classical pharmaceuticals.” [2]

Like thousands of independent (non-Big Pharma) scientists and doctors, Qureshi, is adamant that there absolutely no scientific basis to compel global populations to be jabbed with experimental ‘vaccines’ when perfectly effective, safe and CHEAP alternative therapies are doing such an amazing job.
Instead of being even-handed and performing public service journalism, corrupt BBC hacks Rachel Schraer and Jack Goodman conspicuously avoid mention that India’s vast population might qualify as the largest “control” group in history.
On the flip side is that by discrediting prophylactics (preventative treatments) the BBC and other corrupt fake news peddlers aim to compel the gullible to take the far more risky alternative of the COVID jab.
But as we reported in ‘Is There Evidence Of Millions Of Deaths And Injuries From COVID Vaxxes?’ Savvy citizens can see for themselves that opting for the jab rather is the greater risk to health.

David John Sorensen and Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, M.D. uncovered that the academic medical journals relied upon by the BBC to discredit Ivermectin are also criminally suppressing the truth about vaccine injuries/deaths. As Sorensen and Zelenko showed:
“The famous Lazarus report from Harvard Pilgrim Health Care inc. in 2009 revealed that in general only 1 percent of adverse events from vaccines is being reported:
‘Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3 percent of all adverse drug events and 1-13 percent of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1 percent of vaccine adverse events are reported.’ [3]
Never will you see the BBC, or any other mainstream media outlet come clean on this. These bodies are not independent or impartial. In 2020 multi-billionaire ‘philanthropist’ Bill Gates appeared on the BBC and was also given extensive positive coverage across the vast billion pound taxpayer funded network.
During his interview Gates referred to himself as a ‘health expert’ and this went unchallenged. A coincidence that Gates donated huge sums to the BBC?
All we can do is keep urging our readers to do their own research. Consign the corrupt BBC to your ‘fake news folder’ and never trust another word written by ‘journalists’ Rachel Schraer and Jack Goodman.
References:
[1] https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/lucknow-news/33-districts-in-uttar-pradesh-are-now-covid-free-state-govt-101631267966925.html
[2] https://bioanalyticx.com/covid-treatments/
[3] https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
About John O’Sullivan:  John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI).  John is not only a seasoned science writer but adept legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the multi-million-dollar ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

UK hospital data shocks the world

Published on October 6, 2021Written by naturalnews.com

Eighty percent of UK COVID deaths are now among the vaccinated. COVID deaths are up 3000 percent after vaccine wave.

A deadly combination of science fraud, institutional coercion, bribery, Big Tech censorship, government force and media propaganda are bringing the world to its knees. There is NO real-world data showing that covid-19 vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalization and death.
Right now, hospital data from the United Kingdom is shocking the world, providing serious evidence of vaccine failure and vaccine-induced death.
In the UK, up to 80 percent of COVID deaths are currently coming from vaccinated people. COVID deaths across the UK are now 3,000 percent more frequent than they were at the same time a year ago, when the population was “unvaccinated.”
For over a year, vaccine efficacy was tirelessly promoted, even though absolute risk reduction for all the COVID vaccines on the market was less than two percent, a meaningless number.
To make matters worse, the vaccines are increasing the rate of iatrogenic death and making more people susceptible to severe respiratory disease, priming human cells for antibody dependent enhancement.
The UK’s Yellow Card Scheme, a vaccine injury and medical error surveillance system, shows a clear pattern of vaccine failure.
COVID vaccines are increasing hospitalization and death for people who could have easily gone on with their lives, healthy and VAX-free. Instead of being coerced into risky, compounding vaccine experiments, thousands of sick and dying people could have faced a potential infection and recovered with durable, natural immunity.
UK hospital data shows that covid-19 deaths are 3,000 percent higher now compared to this time last year, and it’s not the “unvaccinated” who are dying in greater numbers. The latest data from Public Health England shows just how dangerous vaccine worship and coercion is.
From February 1, 2021 to September 12, 2021, the unvaccinated represented just 28 percent of the covid fatalities while the vaccinated represented 72 percent of the deaths!
Public Health Scotland confirms the same pattern of vaccine failure. From August 14, 2020 to September 12, 2020, Scotland recorded just seven covid-19 fatalities.
After coercing a large portion of the population to take the covid vaccines, Scotland recorded 222 covid-19 deaths just a year later, during that same period of time.
This covid-19 death spike is 3071.4 percent higher after a mass vaccination campaign. Most shocking of all: 80 percent of these deaths are occurring in the vaccinated.
Vaccine’s purported 95 percent efficacy is a total fraud in the real world, actually increases risk of death
Even though the unvaccinated are coerced to test more frequently for travel, education and work, their numbers are still similar to the “fully vaccinated.” The data shows that COVID cases are relatively equal among the vaccinated and unvaccinated.
From August 21, to September 17, 2021, there were 69,639 positive cases recorded among the unvaccinated population, and 79,613 cases among the vaccinated population, with 60,923 of these cases deriving from the “fully vaccinated.”
Clearly, the vaccine doesn’t prevent COVID, and may even be a driving force for new infections in the unvaccinated.
Most shocking, the rate of death is not 95 percent lower in the vaccinated group. From August 14 to September 10, 2021, Scotland registered 208 covid-19 deaths.
There were 41 deaths in the unvaccinated, 9 deaths in the partially vaccinated, and a shocking 158 deaths in the fully vaccinated.
If the 95 percent efficacy of the vaccine was real, then 95 percent of the deaths would occur in the unvaccinated and only 5 percent would be in the vaccinated.
However, up to 80 percent of the deaths are in the vaccinated and only 20 percent of the deaths are in the unvaccinated.
The vaccines are currently INCREASING the risk of death in the UK by 400 percent!
See more here: naturalnews.com
Header image: The Guardian
Bold emphasis added.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

Norway reclassifies Covid-19 No more dangerous than flu

Published on September 29, 2021Written by extremelyamerican.com

Covid-19 is treated in the mass media as a very dangerous disease in the face of which mass vaccination and severe restrictions for the whole society are applauded despite few deaths beyond the risk groups.

But in Norway, it has now been decided to treat it like other respiratory diseases, such as influenza or the cold virus, because according to the Norwegian Institute of Public Health it is no longer more dangerous than these.
The Norwegian Institute of Public Health FHI has made the remarkable, but statistically supported, decision to classify Covid-19 as a respiratory disease that is as dangerous as the common flu. It is clarified that the pandemic is not over, but that it has entered a new phase where Covid-19 is now equated with a common respiratory disease, such as a flu or respiratory infection.
This is done, among other things, due to the mutations that the Coronavirus has undergone, which makes it less dangerous, together with increased natural and vaccination-induced immunity that has been achieved in Norwegian society.
Although the infection itself continues to circulate in the population, this does not mean an increase in hospital stays, which in itself means that the Coronavirus no longer creates a large burden on healthcare in Norway. This is because the vast majority of those at risk are protected. Those who are vaccinated also get severe symptoms and those who are not in the risk groups also usually only get ordinary mild cold symptoms. FHI thus makes the assessment that the Coronavirus now joins the ranks of other respiratory viruses such as the common cold and seasonal flu.
“It is something positive and sends out signals that at least in Norway, at the moment, they consider themselves aware of the situation,” said Niklas Arnberg, professor of virology at Umeå University and chairman of the Pandemic Foundation to Aftonbladet.
More contagious but less dangerous
The FHI believes that the pandemic itself is not over because it is still out in the world and is spreading at the same time as the proportion of people vaccinated worldwide is low. As long as it spreads outside the territories of rich countries, it will be a continuing pandemic, it is said.
With fewer in the high-risk groups who are in need of healthcare, the burden on healthcare decreases sharply.
The second factor is one that is well known, namely that viruses with very few exceptions over time on purely evolutionary grounds develop towards becoming more contagious but at the same time less lethal. Sars-CoV-2 has undergone thousands of mutations and different variants have replaced each other in the rate of spread and degree of infection, but which have continuously proved less and less deadly.
This spread also continues among vaccinated people as the degree of vaccine protection against this variant is lower than against previous variants, which also enables its continued spread, even in countries where the majority of the population has been vaccinated.
In the studies conducted by FHI, it has been found that both partially and fully vaccinated people who receive Covid-19 have a low risk of having to go to hospital for care, but that the same also applies to healthy people who do not belong to risk groups. In those who were partially vaccinated, it has been concluded that the degree of protection against the Delta variant is only 22 percent, which increases to 65 percent for those who received two doses of vaccine.
There are still low degrees of efficacy compared with the Alpha variant of the virus, where the degree of protection was instead 55 percent and 84 percent for those vaccinated. According to the latest statistics from FHI, 67 new patients have been admitted to hospital with Covid-19 as the main cause during week 37, which is a decrease from 95 cases the week before. But of the new cases in week 37, only 9 patients needed intensive care, a decrease from 22 from the previous week.
It is also believed that the risk of needing medical care increases for those who are completely unvaccinated, but this is otherwise dependent on the risk group you are in. Around 40 percent of those who needed to be admitted for care in Norway during the past week have, for example, been fully vaccinated but have then an overwhelming majority belonged to risk groups.
Around 5 percent have been partially vaccinated and around 55 percent of those admitted have not been vaccinated at all. A total of 11 people died with Covid-19 during week 37, a decrease from 13 deaths the previous week. The average age of those who died in week 37 was 80 years and thus in the risk group.
In Norway, 90 percent of the population over the age of 18 have received their first dose and 83 percent have received their second dose and are thus considered fully vaccinated.
Influenza does not require mass vaccination
The significantly improved situation in Norway means that they choose to classify Covid-19 as a respiratory infection of the same degree of danger as influenza. This does not mean that it is seen as harmless, but rather that just as in the case of influenza, it is believed that it can be managed and that the risks for patients with a Covid-19 or influenza infection are comparable and that it is for people in the risk groups.
“The total societal costs for virus-caused diseases can be tens of billions of kronor every year, without us having a pandemic,” Arnberg told Swedish daily Aftonbladet. He cited common colds and stomach ailments as causes for this.
Every year, between 300 000 and 1,5 million Swedes fall ill with the flu, but few still die, only between 700 and 2000 annually, with fairly large annual variations within this range. As in the case of Covid-19, it is in the risk groups that the overwhelming majority of deaths occur, but no mass vaccinations are carried out at the societal level despite this.
More children aged 10-19, for example, die of the common flu each year, between five and ten children, which is more than what died with Covid-19 in 2020 and 2021, as according to the National Board of Health and Welfare’s death register only four children who died with Covid-19 so far. In terms of this age group, the flu is more dangerous than Covid-19. This is interesting in itself, because in Norway, unlike Sweden, they have chosen not to vaccinate children under 12 years of age.
The future looks bright
By the winter, it is suspected in Norway that the hospitals will not be burdened with patients who have fallen ill with Covid-19, but instead there will be a mixture of Covid-19, other respiratory infections and common flu.
“I think we have reached the top this time. Then I think instead that we will get a winter wave that comes later. But we do not think it will be bigger than the healthcare system can handle,” Geir Bukholm told Verdens Gang.
According to FHI’s assessments, the infection is on the decline, fewer people become seriously ill, very few die and Norway’s assessment that Covid-19 is no longer more dangerous than a common flu looks increasingly correct.
See more here: extremelyamerican.com
Header image: House of Flags
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

The Anthrax Vaccine Program: An Analysis

Published on September 28, 2021Written by National Institutes for Health

The anthrax vaccine was never proved to be safe and effective. It is one cause of Gulf War illnesses, and recent vaccinees report symptoms resembling Gulf War illnesses.

The vaccine’s production has been substandard. Without adequate evaluation, the Food and Drug Administration recently approved (retrospectively) significant changes made to the vaccine’s composition since 1990. The vaccine’s mandatory use for inhalation anthrax is “off-label.”
A skewed review of the vaccine literature by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) led to remunerative collaborative research with the army, involving civilian volunteers. Despite acknowledging possible fetal harm, the CDC offered the vaccine to children and pregnant women.
New trends could weaken prelicensure efficacy and safety review of medical products intended for biodefense and avoid manufacturer liability for their use.
The US Army has considered an ambitious plan to vaccinate all military personnel against biological warfare “threat agents” since at least 1987.1 Anthrax has been considered to be the number one threat. Anthrax vaccine was the only vaccine planned for biowarfare prophylaxis that had a license, and it was already stockpiled by the military in 1987. The vaccine, however, was not licensed for aerosol exposure2 (the form of anthrax that would be faced in an attack), since the license was based only on the evidence of an earlier vaccine’s efficacy against cutaneous anthrax.3–6
A 1995 letter to the vaccine’s manufacturer from the director of the army’s Medical Chemical and Biological Defense Research Program included a study proposal that acknowledged, “This vaccine is not licensed for aerosol exposure expected in a biological warfare environment.”7 A 1995 report authored by the DOD’s anthrax vaccine project manager noted that “protect[ing] service members from aerosol exposure to anthrax can only legally be done if the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] licenses the vaccine for that specific schedule and indication.”8
These documents recognized that although individual physicians can employ licensed drugs and vaccines for off-label uses, the pros and cons for individual patients must be considered. However, mass vaccination programs, and particularly compulsory programs, bypass the role of the physician in making risk–benefit decisions.9 Therefore, such programs must use vaccines only for FDAapproved indications.
In 1996, in anticipation of the vaccine’s use throughout the armed forces, the anthrax vaccine’s manufacturer submitted an investigational new drug application (IND) to the FDA to expand the approved indications for vaccine use.10 The IND, which had been prepared by the army, allowed the DOD to conduct research to support adding a specific indication for aerosol exposure to the label, changing to an intramuscular injection, and reducing the number of vaccine doses.
(The current anthrax vaccine license calls for 6 initial doses over 18 months and then yearly boosters. A soldier embarking on a 20-year military career would thus receive 24 anthrax inoculations before retiring.)
Upon reading The Cobra Event, a novel about a biological attack on New York City, President Clinton decided to do something soon about the biological warfare threat.11 Clinton may not have known that biological weapons, having been used at least since World War I,12,13 have never injured or killed a single American in battle.14
Six months after the IND was filed, but before any supporting data to amend the original license was submitted to the FDA, the assistant secretary of defense for health affairs, Dr Stephen Joseph, asked the acting deputy commissioner of the FDA, Dr Michael Friedman, for a go-ahead to use the vaccine, thus skirting the FDA’s normal regulatory procedures for amending a vaccine license.15
Less than 2 weeks into his new position, Friedman wrote back, “While there is a paucity of data regarding the effectiveness of Anthrax Vaccine for prevention of inhalation anthrax, the current package insert does not preclude this use.”16 However, Friedman’s words merely expressed his personal opinion and did not comply with the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations for amending the vaccine’s label; therefore, they provided no legally acceptable justification for the vaccine’s off-label use.17
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed is approved by the FDA only for veterinarians and workers handling potentially infected animals or their products and for laboratory workers researching anthrax.2,3
In 1997, the DOD finalized the decision to vaccinate all 2.5 million active and reserve military service members, members of the Coast Guard, and certain civilian employees, although no change in the anthrax vaccine label had been approved. At the time, no research had been published that explored the link between anthrax vaccine and Gulf War illnesses, although, in the absence of evidence, expert committees reviewing these illnesses had expressed doubt about a vaccine etiology.18
IMMUNIZATIONS PROCEED DESPITE QUESTIONS
On December 15, 1997, the anthrax vaccine program was announced. A few weeks earlier, Secretary of Defense William Cohen had held up a 5-pound bag of sugar on national television and warned that if the bag contained anthrax, it could kill half of Washington, DC. He also promised that 4 preconditions would be met before the program had his final approval.19 It was later shown that at least 2 of the preconditions were substantially unmet.20
Also in December 1997, a team of Russian researchers reported the creation of a genetically engineered anthrax strain that could resist vaccine protection.21 Later, Ken Alibek, former second-in-command of the Soviet biowarfare program, expressed his concern that additional vaccine-resistant anthrax chimeras had been created.22
In March 1998, Secretary Cohen was publicly vaccinated, and mandatory mass vaccinations began. The science to support the program did not exist. There were no published studies documenting the safety or efficacy of this vaccine for any route of exposure in humans,23 although human studies are required under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Within weeks, military service members began reporting illnesses following vaccination, while others refused the vaccine.
The military leadership responded with court-martials, fines, and less-than-honorable discharges.
In response, an unprecedented 13 congressional hearings explored these issues in depth. In early 2000, the House Committee on Government Reform recommended halting the mandatory program and using the vaccine “only pursuant to FDA regulations governing investigational testing for a new indication.” Its report also said, “The subcommittee finds the AVIP [Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program] a well-intentioned but overwrought response to the threat of anthrax as a biological weapon.”20
Also responding to congressional concerns, an Institute of Medicine committee, formed to investigate potential causes of Persian Gulf War illnesses, was asked to report on the anthrax vaccine’s safety for the DOD. The committee emphasized the lack of evidence for long-term vaccine safety and urged publication of unpublished DOD vaccine studies.24 Subsequently, DOD investigators published a synopsis of the unpublished studies in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,25 glossing over safety concerns by omitting important data from the studies.
Having previously reviewed these studies for the General Accounting Office, I noted the omissions in a commentary to ProMED Mail, an Internet mailing list for infectious disease professionals.26
CDC OVERSEES ADDITIONAL VACCINE RESEARCH
Three years after the anthrax immunization policy was announced, and after half a million people had already been vaccinated as part of the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program, the CDC and its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices reviewed existing research on anthrax vaccine and made recommendations for vaccine use.27
Prior to its publication, David Ashford, a coauthor of the recommendations, had been quoted as saying, “We do not have specific information on the efficacy of the existing vaccine for the prevention of inhalational anthrax and we probably never will.”28
Since the extent of the vaccine’s benefit was uncertain, and the dimensions of the biological warfare risk were unknown, the CDC had no easy task, as it attempted to develop appropriate recommendations for vaccine use. However, the CDC recommendations contain inaccuracies and omissions that compound this difficulty.
1. The recommendations state, “The potency and safety of the final [vaccine] product is confirmed according to US FDA regulations.” This statement obscures the fact that almost all existing lots of vaccine have been quarantined by the FDA29 or held up for approval.30 Furthermore, the FDA did not allow the rebuilt anthrax vaccine manufacturing facility, completed in May 1999, to open until January 2002 because of repeated significant deviations from current good manufacturing practices.31
The renovated filling suite (where bulk vaccine is bottled) could not ensure sterility, so the manufacturer has contracted with another pharmaceutical company to package the vaccine.32 Finally, potency cannot be determined, because the current standard, a guinea pig challenge test, has been shown to be unreliable and irreproducible.33,34
2. The quoted 92.5 percent vaccine efficacy figure was derived from a study of an unlicensed, precursor anthrax vaccine. It is also incorrect, having been calculated by improperly excluding one or more of the vaccinated participants who later developed anthrax.4,35 Furthermore, it reflected spore counts and strains randomly found in factories, not those likely to be encountered in a biological warfare setting.
One might expect to see higher spore concentrations, more virulent anthrax strains, uniform spore sizes, and use of excipients to promote deposition of particles in the terminal alveoli in a bioterrorism event. These features could additionally strain vaccine-induced immunity.21
3. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), jointly managed by the CDC and the FDA, collected a very high rate of adverse event reports for anthrax vaccine relative to other vaccines: 1750 reports (from March 1998 to May 2001), or 1 report for every 300 vaccine recipients. Only 54 percent of these reports showed that there had been a resolution of the reaction when the report was filed.36
VAERS is a voluntary, passive reporting system that does not provide actual reaction rates. In the case of military personnel, for whom a vaccine reaction can prevent deployments and career advancement, reporting an adverse reaction can end a career. General Accounting Office testimony before Congress noted that 60 percent of surveyed air crew members who had had a vaccine reaction did not report it to military medical facilities.37
The DOD has now acknowledged that the systemic reaction rate, listed as 0.2% on the package insert, is actually between 5% and 35%.38 Military vaccine studies have found systemic reaction rates up to 48%.39 The rate of chronic, unresolved reactions remains unknown, but anecdotally is quite high (29% from an unpublished survey at Dover Air Force Base).40
4. The CDC report states, “Analysis of VAERS data documented no pattern of serious adverse events clearly associated with the vaccine.” However, in an unpublished analysis of 1660 VAERS reports performed by Thomas D. Williams of the Hartford Courant and by myself, 10% (168) of the reports) note that the vaccine recipient developed at least 2 of the following 3 symptoms: fatigue, muscle or joint pains, and cognitive or emotional impairment.
This meets the CDC’s own case definition of Gulf War Syndrome.41 Since Gulf War Syndrome–like illnesses have been reported by vaccine recipients in 3 congressional hearings,42–44 the CDC or the FDA would be expected to investigate this pattern of illnesses further. However, according to the FDA’s Mark Elengold, such a review has not been initiated (written communication, January 16, 2001).
The best sources of information on anthrax vaccine’s long-term safety are studies of Gulf War veterans. The CDC report says that 2 CDC studies41,45 of Gulf War illnesses have “examined a possible association with vaccinations, including anthrax vaccination.” The report, however, then admits that for the first study, “the ability of this study to detect a significant difference was limited,” and for the second study, “no specific questions were asked about the anthrax vaccine.”
Although the 2 cited CDC studies lacked the ability to identify a relationship between anthrax vaccine and Gulf War illnesses, the reports’ authors assert that “existing scientific evidence does not support an association between anthrax vaccine and PGW [Persian Gulf War] illnesses.” This is not true.
Since 1998, each of the 4 groups reporting on whether specific deployment vaccines46,47 or anthrax vaccine48–51 cause symptoms of Gulf War illnesses found a statistically significant, positive association between the two. So has a large Veterans Administration study, in data that have been presented but not yet published.52
Among nondeployed but vaccinated Gulf War–era veterans from Kansas who received deployment vaccines in preparation for Gulf duty, the rate of Gulf War illness was 3 times higher than in other nondeployed Gulf War–era veterans who did not receive these vaccinations.46 These nondeployed veterans had no other Gulf War exposures to account for their symptoms.
Making the claim that anthrax vaccination is not related to Gulf War illnesses by citing research that lacked the power to discern a relationship, and ignoring all studies that did show a relationship, does not enhance confidence in the vaccine. It also calls into question the independence of this CDC vaccine review.
The CDC subsequently undertook supervision of a large body of research on anthrax vaccine for the DOD, funded at $23 million, involving several of the CDC recommendation’s authors.53,54 Will similar questions be asked about the scientific integrity of this new research program?
This is taken from a long document. Read the rest here: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Header image: National Museum of American History
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

Fully Vaccinated Americans Have Contracted COVID-19

According to health authorities, the number of COVID-19 cases among Americans who have been completely vaccinated against the virus that causes it has risen to over 7,100. States submit so-called breakthrough cases to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which then publishes the numbers. Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender The …
The post Fully Vaccinated Americans Have Contracted COVID-19 appeared first on The True Defender !.

>