What do you think would happen if you lied to the FBI during a crucial investigation? What do you think would happen if you lied to investigators working on behalf of the Inspector General about a case involving the President of the United States? I’m guessing you would think that it could lead to an … Read more
The truth is – Mark has the assets and people that have managed to buy him the entire USA!
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
Financial trails and investigations prove that during the 2020 elections, Mark Zuckerberg spent hundreds of millions of dollars to turn out likely Democratic voters. But not in the traditional spending way.
“He funded a targeted, private takeover of government election operations by nominally non-partisan — but demonstrably ideological — non-profit organizations.”
This money flow significantly increased Joe Biden’s vote margin in key swing states.
The 2020 election wasn’t stolen — it was bought off by one of the world’s wealthiest and most powerful men, using legal loopholes to “invest”!
“The Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and The Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR) passed a staggering $419.5 million of Zuckerberg’s money into local government elections offices, and it came with strings attached. Every CTCL and CEIR grant spelled out in great detail the conditions under which the grant money was to be used.
Big CTCL and CEIR money had nothing to do with traditional campaign finance, lobbying, or other expenses that are related to increasingly expensive modern elections. It had to do with financing the infiltration of election offices at the city and county level by left-wing activists, and using those offices as a platform to implement preferred administrative practices, voting methods, and data-sharing agreements, as well as to launch intensive outreach campaigns in areas heavy with Democratic voters.
For instance, CTCL/CEIR funded self-described “vote navigators” in Wisconsin to “assist voters, potentially at their front doors, to answer questions, assist in ballot curing … and witness absentee ballot signatures,” and a temporary staffing agency affiliated with Stacey Abrams called “Happy Faces” counting the votes amidst the election-night chaos in Fulton County, Georgia.
CTCL demanded the promotion of universal mail-in voting through suspending election laws, extending deadlines that favored mail-in over in-person voting, greatly expanding opportunities for “ballot curing,” expensive bulk mailings, and other lavish “community outreach” programs that were directed by private activists.
CTCL drove the proliferation of unmonitored private dropboxes (which created major chain of custody issues) and opportunities for novel forms of “mail-in ballot electioneering,” allowed for the submission of numerous questionable post-election-day ballots, and created opportunities for illegal ballot harvesting.
CTCL greatly increased funding for temporary staffing and poll workers, which supported the infiltration of election offices by paid Democratic Party activists, coordinated through a complex web of left-leaning non-profit organizations, social media platforms, and social media election influencers.”
the research further states that “of the 26 grants CTCL provided to cities and counties in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia that were $1 million or larger, 25 went to areas Biden won in 2020. The only county on this list won by Donald Trump (Brown County, Wisconsin) received about $1.1 million—less than 1.3 percent of the $85.5 million that CTCL provided to these top 26 recipients.
But even in Brown County, Wisconsin, where heavily Democrat Green Bay is located, the funding disparities are glaring. The Wisconsin legislature provided roughly $7 per voter to the city of Green Bay to manage its 2020 elections. Rural counties in Wisconsin received approximately $4 per voter.
The CTCL funds boosted Democratic-voting Green Bay resources to $47 per voter, while most rural areas still had the same $4 per voter. Similar funding disparities occurred near Detroit, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Flint, Dallas, Houston, and other cities that received tens of millions of dollars of CTCL money.
Preliminary analysis shows this partisan targeting of CTCL funding was repeated in battleground states across the country. Our first case study, however, examines the effect of CTCL spending on the 2020 election in Texas.”
How This Money Affected Texas?
“The effects of CTCL and CEIR spending on Biden’s vote margin in 2020 using publicly available data from government reports combined with widely available voter and demographic data. Specifically, we used Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) to “learn” how changes in key election variables impact the change in Biden’s 2020 vote share.
BART is a machine-learning algorithm that is considered a gold standard in making causal inferences. It enables us to avoid mistaking correlation for causation in our estimations.
For each county, we used 1) two-party Hillary Clinton 2016 vote share, 2) turnout percent in 2016, 3) county share of the total state population, 4) geographic location, measured in terms of longitude and latitude, and 5) per-capita CTCL and CEIR spending, to predict changes in Biden’s two-party 2020 vote margin.”
“To put this figure into perspective, however, Ted Cruz’s margin of victory over Beto O’Rourke in Texas’ 2018 Senate race was only 214,921 votes. It is not inconceivable that Democrats would consider a similar effort, were it to take place in 2024, a small price to pay to oust Cruz from his hotly contested Senate seat.”
in this way. Zuckerberg not only that he bought himself one of the largest, wealthiest leading economies in the world – he is directly influencing international politics, without him personally be involved!
One year ago, many conservative hopes were pinned on Durham. He was expected to jail Hillary and her gang, exonerate Trump, and prove him right on all charges. The deep state, the new world order, and a Dairy Queen in Florence were supposed to be destroyed due to the elitist conspiracy to destroy good folk.
But, nothing happened, only one funny thing. Only one small fry or two got named and prosecuted. The fight continues after one year. Jonathan Turley shared the updates on this issue.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
They want to pretend it is not happening, but it really is…. https://t.co/IEXdIsYIeH
— Lara Logan (@laralogan) October 11, 2021
Turley stated that Washington was shocked by Michael Sussman’s indictment. He was the former counsel for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Dems National committee. The indictment resulted from his role in spreading a false Russia conspiracy theory.
Durham is described as painfully methodical or positively glacial as a prosecutor, and he was prompted to indict Sussman by an expiring statute of limitations.
It’s impossible for Durham to have disclosed as much as he did in the indictment. He’s probably working on other targets, such as Jake Sullivan.
Sullivan could be in the unenviable position of having to argue that he wasn’t perjurious but clueless in denying knowledge of crucial facts to Congress.
Maybe Sullivan’s indictment is unlikely, but he appeared unexpectedly. The national security adviser might not be done with the special counsel.
So, if Durham investigates who knew or approved of the Alfa-Bank conspiracy claim in the Clinton campaign, then Sullivan is the first one.
Besides Sussman, Durham thinks someone else hid the Clinton campaign’s role in creating the Alfa-Bank scandal on purpose.
During the testimony, Sullivan stated that he didn’t know the Alfa-Bank scandal was the work of a Clinton lawyer and those linked with the campaign. No one knows if Durham has evidence to contradict this claim of ignorance on the work done by campaign counsel and researchers.
Michael Cohen was also indicted for lying to Congress about Trump’s involvement in negotiations over a Moscow real estate agreement.
Sullivan shared his denial series with Congress in 2017. The statute for limitations for lying to Congress is five years, which signifies that Sullivan would be within range for Durham if the council doesn’t buy his denials. Furthermore, Sullivan could find himself unindicted but exposed in a blistering report.
Published on October 6, 2021Written by Matthew Ehret
Where one system increases deserts by spreading solar panels across the face of the earth, the other actually greens deserts by careful reclamation, desalination and water diversion programs.
With the world gearing up for Mark Carney’s upcoming COP26 Climate Summit in the UK this October 31- September 12, 2021, it is worth asking: Will China and India collaborate with other nations of the multipolar alliance once more to save the world from a supranational world government?
You may be asking what I mean by “once more”?
The fact is that today’s efforts by an international financial elite to lock nation states into binding carbon reduction treaties is nothing new and was first attempted in December 2009. This was a period of profound instability as the world economy was trembling on a near meltdown of a $700 billion speculative bubble. We were also told that a new black plague was emerging with a novel influenza virus called H1N1.
Back then, the Belt and Road Initiative was still four years from coming online, and Presidents Qaddafi, Assad, Mubarak and Bashir still could not guess what horrors they would yet face under the new regime change operation then still in its planning phase.
But just like today, the goals behind COP14 were clear: Create new supranational mechanisms capable of penalizing nations from breaking CO2 reduction targets between 2009 and 2050.
This new order of governance would of course only function through the creation of 1) a new system of global technocratic controls to help nations adapt to the new era of scarcity and de-growth, and 2) a new post-nation state system enforcing a rules-based order which could trump the wishes of selfish sovereign nation states who might otherwise make decisions in defense of their people instead of “wise” computer models.
The 2009 summit was marketed as “historic”. World leaders walked into the event treating it like a gala of stars where Obama, Hollande, Brown, Merkel, Rudd and other trans Atlantic leaders hoped they would return to their home nations as heroic eco-warriors having saved the world.
But in the weeks before the summit signs of its inevitable failure were already visible. The name for this failure was “Climate-gate”.
Climate-Gate Derails a Dream
On November 17, 2009, a major scandal erupted when 61 MB of data comprising thousands of emails internally circulated among the directors and researchers at East Anglia University’s Climate Research Unit (CRU) were made public.
To this day, it has not been verified if the scandal occurred via an internal leak or a hack, but what was verified throughout the hundreds of emails between director Phil Jones and the teams of climatologists staffing the CRU was that vast scales of fraud were committed.
Jones himself was caught red handed demanding that data sets be ignored and massaged in order to justify the climate models (such as Michael Mann’s fraudulent “hockey stick” made famous by Al Gore) which had all been used to sell the idea that CO2 was the greatest threat to humanity.
Within the leaked emails, scientists were told to fudge data and cover up such problematic things as the medieval warming period which saw average temperatures far warmer than those seen in the 20th century, yet with far lower rates of human-made CO2.
East Anglia’s CRU is the world’s foremost center of data set centralization and climate model generation which feeds directly into the UN’s Independent Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and which in turn feeds into every major NGO, school, corporation and government.
The other central control point of data selection and model generation (for both climate change and covid-19 data sets) is an Oxford-based operation called “Our World In Data”, funded in large measure by the UK government and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
The results of Climate Gate sent shockwaves through the scientific community as even leading climate scientist and pro-COP14 supporter George Monbiot proclaimed:
“It’s no use pretending that this isn’t a major blow. The emails extracted by a hacker from the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia could scarcely be more damaging. I am now convinced that they are genuine, and I’m dismayed and deeply shaken by them.
Yes, the messages were obtained illegally. Yes, all of us say things in emails that would be excruciating if made public. Yes, some of the comments have been taken out of context. But there are some messages that require no spin to make them look bad. There appears to be evidence here of attempts to prevent scientific data from being released, and even to destroy material that was subject to a freedom of information request.
Worse still, some of the emails suggest efforts to prevent the publication of work by climate sceptics, or to keep it out of a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I believe that the head of the unit, Phil Jones, should now resign.”
The terrible publicity of Climate Gate essentially caused COP-14 to become a big goose egg, as Chinese and Indian delegates refused to play along, and ensured that all teeth were removed from any binding carbon caps.
China and India Break the Rules of the Game
London Guardian climate journalist Mark Lynas reported in horror:
“Copenhagen was a disaster. That much is agreed… China wrecked the talks, intentionally humiliated Barack Obama, and insisted on an awful “deal” so western leaders would walk away carrying the blame. How do I know this? Because I was in the room and saw it happen. China’s strategy was simple: block the open negotiations for two weeks, and then ensure that the closed-door deal made it look as if the west had failed the world’s poor once again.”
In case anyone was still uncertain about China’s role in derailing this event, Lynas wrote:
“To those who would blame Obama and rich countries in general, know this: it was China’s representative who insisted that industrialised country targets, previously agreed as an 80% cut by 2050, be taken out of the deal. “Why can’t we even mention our own targets?” demanded a furious Angela Merkel. Australia’s prime minister, Kevin Rudd, was annoyed enough to bang his microphone. Brazil’s representative too pointed out the illogicality of China’s position.
Why should rich countries not announce even this unilateral cut? The Chinese delegate said no, and I watched, aghast, as Merkel threw up her hands in despair and conceded the point… China, backed at times by India, then proceeded to take out all the numbers that mattered. A 2020 peaking year in global emissions, essential to restrain temperatures to 2C°, was removed and replaced by woolly language suggesting that emissions should peak “as soon as possible”.
Not only did Chinese and Indian delegates lock themselves in a room alongside other nations of the global south (notably including Sudan), refusing entry of Hillary Clinton and other western puppets attempting to “help” reach a consensus, but the leaders of both nations blocked all binding agreements from being set in stone.
In December 2009, a former chief economic advisor to Putin stated that Russia had sent data to East Anglia’s CRU from 476 meteorological stations covering over 20 percent of the globe’s surface hosting a wide range of data from as far back as 1865 to 2005. Dr. Illarionov explained that he was dismayed to see that Phil Jones and the CRU entirely ignored the data from all but 121 stations.
From those stations they did use, Jones and his team artificially cherry-picked data that gave off the false result that temperatures between 1860-1965 were 0.67 degrees colder than they truly were while temperatures from 1965-2005 were made artificially high. (1)
After being suspended for a few months, a UK review panel absolved Jones from his transgressions and re-installed him into his old position of carbon data gatekeeper at the CRU.
Twelve Years Later
Today, 12 years of propaganda have attempted to wipe Climate Gate from the internet and our collective memory as the same fallacious models and data sets have continued to be used to justify the sort of panicky fear-driven decisions to radically alter civilization forever.
Mark Carney has risen to great heights since his 2009 role steering Canada’s Central Bank through the storm of 2009 to become the head of the Bank of England (2013-2019), trustee of the World Economic Forum, co-founder of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures alongside Michael Bloomberg and leading technocratic manager of the Great Reset program for global governance.
His role as a high priest of green finance has been documented elsewhere, but the thing to keep in mind is that the Carney/WEF version of a green world differs drastically from the approach taken by China, India, Russia and the growing array of nations among the Multipolar alliance.
Two Opposing Paths to a Green Future
How do these approaches to green, sustainable policymaking differ?
Where one defines “sustainable development” as a euphemism for de-growth (and de-population) under a unipolar rules-based international order, the other looks towards “sustained development” as a driving force for long term growth, multipolarism and even population increases premised on large scale capital-intensive infrastructure building.
Where one system increases deserts by spreading solar panels across the face of the earth (and in turn increasing surface temperatures drastically), the other actually greens deserts by careful reclamation, desalination and water diversion programs such as China’s Move South Water North.
Yes, China and India are building a lot of green energy programs and they intend to lower their rates of CO2 output by 2060. However, unlike the post-modern basket cases in the west who are clamoring for a Fourth Industrial Revolution, Eurasian nations are not resting their entire development strategies on windmills and solar panels.
Instead what we find are competent programs for hydropower, oil, coal, natural gas, hydrogen power and importantly next generation nuclear power (with pioneering work on Molten Salt thorium as well as fusion power in the works.
Looking to NASA’s recent surprise discovery that the world’s biomass has increased by over five percent due in large measure to India and China’s economic activity, the fact is slowly emerging into the zeitgeist that the apparent conflict between humanity’s aspirations to grow vs the health of ecosystems is a chimera.
The obvious fact that carbon dioxide also happens to be considered by all chlorophyl-based life to be a delicious food should also not be lost in the rush to demonize CO2.
If we can simply break ourselves free from the imperial operating system attempting to herd the world into a slaughterhouse of a new technocratic feudalism and instead embrace our destiny as a species of creative reason capable of boundless self-perfectibility both on the earth and beyond into the cosmos, then not only could a war be averted in the short term, but a new multipolar cultural renaissance might even emerge.
See more here: strategic-culture.org
Header image: Youtube
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
May 20, 2021 An alleged letter from the Capitol Police started making the rounds among Democrat politicians Wednesday night, expressing “profound disappointment” that some Republicans saw no need for a Jan. 6th commission. But, turns out, the letter may have been fake. The letter used the USCP letterhead, but it wasn’t signed by the Chief … Read more
May 20, 2021 An alleged letter from the Capitol Police started making the rounds among Democrat politicians Wednesday night, expressing “profound disappointment” that some Republicans saw no need for a Jan. 6th commission. But, turns out, the letter was fake. The letter used the USCP letterhead, but it wasn’t signed by the Chief of Police, … Read more
In the Biden sham show, Biden’s top aide and the person many people assume is the “true President” has a large “Trump skeleton” in her wardrobe. Susan Rice-uncle, Cameron’s John David Rice-Cameron, is a staunch Trump supporter, as you might know. Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender Yes, Susan and her friends are …
The post SHOCKING: Susan Rice Has a Massive “Trump Skeleton” in Her Closet appeared first on The True Defender !.
One astute young man who has been paying attention to Kamala and the Biden administration’s racial divide has a serious problem with what she has said. True, this country hasn’t been this racially divided and unhappy since Obama took office – and it’s understandable, given that we all know he’s “back in the office,” right? …
The post [WATCH] U.S. Soldier is Looking Through Kamala’s Race-Baiting appeared first on The True Defender !.
The DuPage County State’s Attorney’s Office filed five charges against people linked with the 2020 general election. As the Illinois state’s attorney’s office claims, all those five people faced one felony charge of perjury linked to the election code. Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender The prosecutor said that three of five people …
The post BREAKING: People Charged With Voter Fraud In Biden-Voting County! appeared first on The True Defender !.
The reason? He misses helping people! Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender In the latest interview with Fox News’s Sean Hannity, President Trump stated he really misses helping people, and that’s the whole reason he is seriously considering another presidential run in the upcoming 2024. He also noted that in the 2020 elections, …
The post WATCH: Trump Says He Seriously Considers Running For President Again In 2024 appeared first on The True Defender !.