Review: Don’t Waste Time Or Money On ‘Silent Earth’

Published on October 15, 2021Written by PA Pundits International

Book reviews usually tell people, buy this new hardback. This article advises, don’t bother reading Silent Earth, much less purchasing a copy; it’s mostly a junk-science, anti-technology screed.

Dave Goulson’s book expands on Silent Spring, Rachel Carson’s polemic against pesticides that helped rid Europe and the USA of deadly malaria, and now protect crops that require so much land, water, work, fertilizer and energy to grow and harvest that we dare not sacrifice them to hordes of hungry insects.
Carson falsely blamed DDT for her cancer – and launched the practice of using conjecture, poetic prose, hyperbole and even fraud, instead of evidence-based science, to advance environmentalist agendas. The Environmental Defense Fund used her book to drive its campaign to ban DDT and give environmentalists “a level of authority they never had before.”
The EPA ban led to the deaths of millions of Africans and Asians from malaria, which could have been reduced dramatically by using this powerful spatial repellant in conjunction with modern insecticides and anti-malarial drugs. (See here, here, here and here.)
Relying mostly on inventive speculation, Goulson claims a silent spring devoid of chirping birds could soon become a silent planet devoid of insects that pollinate flowers and crops, and feed birds, amphibians, reptiles, mammals and (if former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan has his way) billions of us humans.
It would take another book to address all the new book’s errors and problems, but here are a few.
Goulson transforms the supposed “bee-pocalypse” of a few years ago into a global apocalypse for all insects, and potentially all life on Earth. He blames modern agriculture, “greedy corporations,” free-market/personal-choice capitalism, too many humans who eat too much and live too well, urban light pollution and o course manmade climate change. Above all, he blames modern synthetic pesticides, though he does recognize that many “natural” “organic” chemicals are toxic to insects, wildlife and even humans.
Honeybee populations have been on a happy rebound for several years now, after being hit hard by Varroa destructor mites, Nosema, and other bee parasites and diseases. They were also harmed by beekeepers who tried to address these problems, but sometimes misused or overused mitacides. US Department of Agriculture surveys now show there are now over 150,000 more beehives than in 1995.
Studies in actual farmers’ fields have consistently shown no adverse effects on honeybees at the colony level from realistic exposures to neonicotinoid insecticides, one of Goulson’s primary scapegoats. In fact, bees thrive in and around neonic-treated canola, corn and other crops in the United States, Canada, Europe and elsewhere. As to wild bees, 98% don’t even pollinate agricultural crops – and the species that do are thriving, even though they have the greatest contact with neonics. That shouldn’t be surprising.
Neonicotinoids are used primarily to coat seeds. They are systemic pesticides that become part of the plant tissue and target only pests that actually feed on the crops, particularly during early growth stages. Sulfloxaflor is similar in that regard. Both are far safer for general insect populations than older pesticides or organic farming chemicals that are applied by air, hand or truck across entire fields – and often beyond.
Goulson ignores all this and advances his central claim that populations of all insects are in precipitous decline globally. He bases that largely on a 2017 study by him and several colleagues. They assert that insect populations plummeted by over 75% during a 25-year period in several German nature reserves – then extrapolate that and a few other studies to the entire planet.
But their study didn’t track the same areas from year to year and employed traps that capture insects only while they’re flying. That misses non-flying insects and is heavily dependent on rainfall and other weather.
There’s simply no reliable evidence of a general insect decline. Indeed, some 900,000 insect species have been identified around the world, though total estimates range from 2 million to 30 million species. That and extremely limited monitoring programs make it impossible to calculate global insect population trends. Moreover, an extensive insect population study published in 2020 found no overall decline in North America, with declines in some US areas offset by increases elsewhere. The verdict is still out.
Goulson also claims modern pesticides are vastly more toxic than their predecessors. However, an Agriculture Department analysis concluded that, between 1968 and 2008, overall US pesticide toxicity plunged by 98% – while the amount of pesticides (insecticides and herbicides) applied per acre declined by 60% and pesticide persistence in soils and waters was cut in half, as farmers used different, better, more-targeted pesticides more carefully and judiciously, and employed other measures to control pests.
He pillories glyphosate, the active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup, claiming the chemical is harmful to bees, has been linked to other insect and even bird declines, and causes cancer in humans. For evidence he cites the International Agency on Research and Cancer.
But as I explain in a medical journal paper, IARC has strong ties to American trial lawyers who have filed multiple lawsuits over glyphosate – and the agency’s claims have been roundly contradicted by a decades-long US National Cancer Institute Agricultural Health Study – and by more than 3,300 studies around the world that support glyphosate safety. Reliance on IARC puts Goulson on very thin ice.
He’s against synthetic fertilizers (and more CO2) that help us grow far more food from much less land – because they can allegedly reduce floral diversity, make other plants less palatable for insects, pollute aquatic systems and contribute to climate change. He wants children to learn more about ecology and nature in school (presumably only his lesson plans) – and applauds the UK’s Extinction Rebellion lunatics.
These errors, omissions, exaggerations, falsifications and biases shouldn’t be surprising. A widely published biology professor, Goulson is also a trustee for Pesticide Action Network, an ideologically driven anti-pesticide organization.
Goulson’s proffered solutions to his imagined insect Armageddon are equally fanciful. While acknowledging that organic farming uses nasty chemicals and produces 80-90 percent lower yields than conventional modern agriculture, he wants still more organic farms – even though plowing billions more acres for the same overall crop yields would have horrific impacts on insects and wildlife.
With millions of jobs disappearing, he says the newly unemployed could work on organic farms, in backyard plots and in urban community gardens (doing stoop labor, pulling weeds and picking bugs off vegetables). Ruling elites wouldn’t do such work, of course, but we commoners should.
Amid his concerns about climate change, the author likewise ignores how industrial-scale wind turbines would splatter birds and insects, solar panels would obliterate habitats, and converting forests into wood pellets for “biofuel” electricity generation would destroy still more habitats. Mining and processing for Green New Deal metals and minerals would drastically harm people, insects and planet.
Ultimately, Goulson concludes, we need fewer people, who eat less and “switch to a predominantly vegetable diet, supplemented by small amounts of sustainably-harvested fish and grass-fed meat” (and bugs). Ruling elites once again likely exempted.
It all looks lie part of the Green warriors’ mission to stamp out prosperity as we know it.
Silent Earth will undoubtedly get rave reviews from environmentalists, leftist journalists, Big Tech, teachers unions, and the rest of the Cancel Culture. The insanity will get foisted on our children. Parents and policymakers should be wary.
See more here:
Header image: Amazon
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 


Trackback from your site.

Canada: Epidemiology Expert Trashes Lockdowns & COVID Shots for Kids

Published on October 15, 2021Written by

Dr. Paul Alexander advocates for a complete change over of pandemic responders; to fire those who have failed us, stop shifting the blame to the public who have done their part, and elect qualified experts.

In this interview, I bring you a highly qualified, well-versed expert in the field of epidemiology, evidence-based medicine and research methodology,.Dr. Paul Elias Alexander.
Dr. Alexander has a lengthy resume. Some of his previous employers include Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada, where he worked for 12 years as an epidemiologist.
Some of Dr. Alexander’s other credentials: include spending a few years at the Infectious Diseases Society of America; working with the World Health Organization as Europe’s regional specialist/epidemiologist in Denmark; serving as COVID Pandemic evidence-synthesis consultant advisor to WHO-PAHO Washington, D.C.
That experience helped land him the role of senior advisor to COVID Pandemic policy in Health and Human Services for the Trump administration.
He is considered one of the top global research methodologists because of his training under Dr. Gordon Guyatt, to name one of many, and for his work establishing the GRADE approach — that is, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation — developed to address the shortcomings of grading systems in health care and uphold high standards of evidence-based recommendations and guidelines.
Dr. Alexander and I discuss the COVID-19 injection roll out being pushed heavily for children aged 5-11, the catastrophic harms that government-imposed pandemic responses have caused and touch on one of his recent opinion pieces, Twenty Steps to End the Madness.
He advocates for a complete change over of pandemic responders; to fire those who have failed us, stop shifting the blame to the public who have done their part, and elect qualified experts.
See more here:
Header image: American Institute for Economic Research
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 


Trackback from your site.

‘Fully Vaccinated’ Are COVID ‘Super-Spreaders,’ Says Inventor of mRNA Technology

Editor’s Note: Increasingly we are seeing vaxx-nannies pushing back on medical freedom by saying the unvaccinated are infringing on theirs. This is a lack of understanding on their part, which makes the article below and interview with Dr. Robert Malone extremely important to share with others. Here’s Jeremy’s article… On the latest episode of “The Hidden Gateway” […]
The post ‘Fully Vaccinated’ Are COVID ‘Super-Spreaders,’ Says Inventor of mRNA Technology appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes.

Fluvoxamine data for COVID-19 Treatment

Published on October 12, 2021Written by

Early research suggests that fluvoxamine, an FDA approved medication for depression and obsessive compulsive disorder, can be an effective early treatment for COVID-19.

Fluvoxamine, created 37 years ago, is an inexpensive and widely available generic drug. It’s in a class of drugs called Selective Serotonin-Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). SSRIs appear to activate a central nervous system protein that plays a role in regulating inflammatory responses.
Small clinical and observational studies show that repurposing fluvoxamine to treat coronavirus prevents some of the most serious complications related to inflammation, and keeps people from hospitalization.
Serendipity and Science
In March, as the coronavirus began to devastate the world, Dr. Nicolas Hoertel, associate professor of psychiatry at Paris University and a psychiatrist at a hospital in Paris, noticed that far fewer of his patients had symptomatic COVID-19 than did the caregivers in the unit.
After consulting with other hospital employees around Paris, Dr. Hoertel and his colleagues published a large COVID-19 and the drug with the greatest sigma-1 activation in the study (fluoxetine in that case) had the greatest protection. The study states that antidepressants “could be associated with lower risk of death or intubation in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.”
At the same time, Angela Reiersen, a psychiatrist at Washington University in St. Louis was exploring a similar theory. Recalling research published in 2019 suggesting fluvoxamine reduced damaging aspects of the inflammatory response during sepsis, Dr. Reiersen wondered if the drug could have similar effects on Covid-19 patients. She teamed up with colleague Dr. Eric Lenze and developed a study design.
With support from CETF, a randomized, double-blind and fully remote outpatient clinical trial was conducted. The trial included 152 people, all of whom were 18 years or older, symptomatic, and diagnosed with mild forms of COVID-19. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to take either Fluvoxamine or a placebo.
In this trial, of the 80 participants who received the drug, no patients hit the endpoint of clinical deterioration (defined as reaching blood oxygen saturation level of less than 92% and shortness of breath requiring supplemental oxygen), versus 6 people out of 72 who got the placebo and did reach the clinical endpoint.
In summary, all fluvoxamine-treated patients did not meet the study endpoint. The study appeared as the lead story in JAMA on November 12, 2020. The Editors noted that they chose this study from more than 10,000 COVID submissions received since February 2020.  The study was the third-most popular article on JAMA for the month of December 2020.
Intrigued by these results, CETF founder Steve Kirsch accepted an invitation to discuss the findings on a weekly virtual meeting of the Harvard Business School Association of Northern California, which was led by Dr. David Seftel, the physician at Golden Gate Fields horse-racing track in Berkeley, CA.
On November 21, 2020, within days of the virtual Harvard meeting, a mass COVID-19 outbreak occurred at the racetrack, initially infecting 200 employees. After doing his own research and weighing the potential risks, Dr. Seftel decided to offer patients the option to take fluvoxamine.
At first, only 35 percent of the employees opted to try the drug but after 2 weeks, 100 percent opted to take the drug. None of those 77 employees required hospitalization, compared with a 12.5 percent hospitalization rate for the 48 employees who declined the drug.  In addition, after two weeks, none of the treatment group had any COVID-19 symptoms while 60 percent of the group who declined the drug had one or more COVID-19 symptoms (p-value

POP Quiz, Merck Caught Covering Up Aborted Human Fetal Cells! EU Bans Vax For Youngsters!

The C-19 vaccine was banned in Scandinavian countries for some groups, China warned of imminent war against the world, and we have another situation update. It starts with Pop Quiz covering ten zones where people should be prepared.
You have to watch the 25-minute-long podcast, grade yourself with 10 points for every one of the ten preparedness areas you have covered. If you reach 70+, then you are well prepared.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here:
Mainstream media tries to trick the public with “new math” about vaccine-injured people in the hospitals.The mainstream media doesn’t want to stop reporting fake news. They moved on with statements like, “Nearly 13% of hospital patients with confirmed Covid were unvaccinated.” It means that 87% of the hospitalized are VACCINATED!
I guess they think people forgot how to do basic math.
Scandinavian nations ban the use of Moderna’s covid vaccine in younger people.There were reports of young people experiencing myocarditis, blood loss, and heart attack; Sweden and Denmark first, now Finland too, banned the Moderna covid vaccine for the young population, precisely for people under 30.

The US, UK, Canada are glad that they are killing people, especially youngsters. I guess they strive for global depopulation.
Energy and power grids are rapidly collapsing in Asia and Europe.
21 out of 30 provinces struggle with rolling blackouts in China as power generation bandwidth crumbles because of coal shortages. The South China Morning Post reported that some factories are operating only one day per week.
US coal production can’t follow the global demand. However, the natural gas shortage, price increase throughout the EU has fertilizer producers reeling. Some of them have shut down, and not so long ago, Germany’s largest ammonia plant slashed its output and warned about shuttering the entire operation.
The upshot is that energy prices will trust millions of people throughout the EU and China into poverty as manufacturing is affected. It is going to be a harsh winter.
The natural gas shortage affected good production across the EU. So, the EU will face food scarcity after the 2022 harvest.
Colorado’s healthcare system orders the woman to DIE from lack of a kidney transplant because she won’t take the spike protein injection.
It seems that if you want to remain alive, first you have to destroy your organism by taking the vaccine and then go to transplant surgery.
Additionally, the letter you are going to read below is sent to a patient by UCHealth admin Katherine Hamann, the Kidney Transplant Coordinator:

The bioweapon destroys the kidneys. So, the vaccine industry damages the kidneys, brings you to a transplant and orders you to get more injections to receive the transplant.
Everything happens for more profit for Big Pharma.
Hear all this and more in today’s Situation Update podcast!
Please, hear the podcast below, and you will understand the entire insanity happening in the world.
It’s unbelievable how some people are still supporting the vaccines and force others to take them:

Celebrities, Athletes Gagged on Criticising Lockdowns, Restrictions: Former NBA Star

Australian basketball legend and former NBA player Andrew Bogut says athletes and celebrities have told him secretly that while they disagree with government-mandated health restrictions, they are essentially muzzled from speaking out. Article by Daniel Y. Teng from our premium news partners at The Epoch Times. In an interview with The Epoch Times on Oct. 5, Bogut […]
The post Celebrities, Athletes Gagged on Criticising Lockdowns, Restrictions: Former NBA Star appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes.

BREAKING NEWS: Pfizer Uses Foetal Tissue In The Vax! Project Veritas Proves!

It’s breaking news!
There is only one reason for the people not to take the vaccine: they don’t want to!
No one should force you to do something that you don’t want. People should stick to what they have planned. The authority will find its way to implement its vaccines to the population, but they can’t harm us if we stick together.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here:
They will eliminate all the exemptions one at a time or together.
The authorities said that a singular belief isn’t enough. We know people that have to leave their job at the hospital because they refused a deeply held religious belief as a single belief, although in this case, it was legitimate in the sense that on top of the person’s medical expertise leading the person to think that the vaccine is a terrible idea, the person’s religious beliefs also exempt this person.

This item sells for $39.95 on Amazon. Today’s special promotion is offering a massive discount on this item. President Trump 2020 Coin (Gold & Silver Plated) – Claim 1 Free OR Claim a Discount + Free Shipping This coin is a symbol of President Trump’s victory and success. Get Coin HERE Or Click on the image below.

Let’s talk about the exceptions, and it’s like the private clubs, and the smoking ban is a con. They never planned to allow exceptions, except at a whim. The pro basketball players that go to Canada don’t have to take the vaccine because they give a national service.
However, we have to take the vaccine.
Take a look at the video below and see what else the Pfizer whistleblower will tell you:
[embedded content]

The Collision of Two Opposing Green Destinies

Published on October 6, 2021Written by Matthew Ehret

Where one system increases deserts by spreading solar panels across the face of the earth, the other actually greens deserts by careful reclamation, desalination and water diversion programs.

With the world gearing up for Mark Carney’s upcoming COP26 Climate Summit in the UK this October 31- September 12, 2021, it is worth asking: Will China and India collaborate with other nations of the multipolar alliance once more to save the world from a supranational world government?
You may be asking what I mean by “once more”?
The fact is that today’s efforts by an international financial elite to lock nation states into binding carbon reduction treaties is nothing new and was first attempted in December 2009. This was a period of profound instability as the world economy was trembling on a near meltdown of a $700 billion speculative bubble. We were also told that a new black plague was emerging with a novel influenza virus called H1N1.
Back then, the Belt and Road Initiative was still four years from coming online, and Presidents Qaddafi, Assad, Mubarak and Bashir still could not guess what horrors they would yet face under the new regime change operation then still in its planning phase.
But just like today, the goals behind COP14 were clear: Create new supranational mechanisms capable of penalizing nations from breaking CO2 reduction targets between 2009 and 2050.
This new order of governance would of course only function through the creation of 1) a new system of global technocratic controls to help nations adapt to the new era of scarcity and de-growth, and 2) a new post-nation state system enforcing a rules-based order which could trump the wishes of selfish sovereign nation states who might otherwise make decisions in defense of their people instead of “wise” computer models.
The 2009 summit was marketed as “historic”. World leaders walked into the event treating it like a gala of stars where Obama, Hollande, Brown, Merkel, Rudd and other trans Atlantic leaders hoped they would return to their home nations as heroic eco-warriors having saved the world.
But in the weeks before the summit signs of its inevitable failure were already visible. The name for this failure was “Climate-gate”.
Climate-Gate Derails a Dream
On November 17, 2009, a major scandal erupted when 61 MB of data comprising thousands of emails internally circulated among the directors and researchers at East Anglia University’s Climate Research Unit (CRU) were made public.
To this day, it has not been verified if the scandal occurred via an internal leak or a hack, but what was verified throughout the hundreds of emails between director Phil Jones and the teams of climatologists staffing the CRU was that vast scales of fraud were committed.
Jones himself was caught red handed demanding that data sets be ignored and massaged in order to justify the climate models (such as Michael Mann’s fraudulent “hockey stick” made famous by Al Gore) which had all been used to sell the idea that CO2 was the greatest threat to humanity.
Within the leaked emails, scientists were told to fudge data and cover up such problematic things as the medieval warming period which saw average temperatures far warmer than those seen in the 20th century, yet with far lower rates of human-made CO2.
East Anglia’s CRU is the world’s foremost center of data set centralization and climate model generation which feeds directly into the UN’s Independent Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and which in turn feeds into every major NGO, school, corporation and government.
The other central control point of data selection and model generation (for both climate change and covid-19 data sets) is an Oxford-based operation called “Our World In Data”, funded in large measure by the UK government and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
The results of Climate Gate sent shockwaves through the scientific community as even leading climate scientist and pro-COP14 supporter George Monbiot proclaimed:
“It’s no use pretending that this isn’t a major blow. The emails extracted by a hacker from the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia could scarcely be more damaging. I am now convinced that they are genuine, and I’m dismayed and deeply shaken by them.
Yes, the messages were obtained illegally. Yes, all of us say things in emails that would be excruciating if made public. Yes, some of the comments have been taken out of context. But there are some messages that require no spin to make them look bad. There appears to be evidence here of attempts to prevent scientific data from being released, and even to destroy material that was subject to a freedom of information request.
Worse still, some of the emails suggest efforts to prevent the publication of work by climate sceptics, or to keep it out of a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I believe that the head of the unit, Phil Jones, should now resign.”
The terrible publicity of Climate Gate essentially caused COP-14 to become a big goose egg, as Chinese and Indian delegates refused to play along, and ensured that all teeth were removed from any binding carbon caps.
China and India Break the Rules of the Game
London Guardian climate journalist Mark Lynas reported in horror:
“Copenhagen was a disaster. That much is agreed… China wrecked the talks, intentionally humiliated Barack Obama, and insisted on an awful “deal” so western leaders would walk away carrying the blame. How do I know this? Because I was in the room and saw it happen. China’s strategy was simple: block the open negotiations for two weeks, and then ensure that the closed-door deal made it look as if the west had failed the world’s poor once again.”
In case anyone was still uncertain about China’s role in derailing this event, Lynas wrote:
“To those who would blame Obama and rich countries in general, know this: it was China’s representative who insisted that industrialised country targets, previously agreed as an 80% cut by 2050, be taken out of the deal. “Why can’t we even mention our own targets?” demanded a furious Angela Merkel. Australia’s prime minister, Kevin Rudd, was annoyed enough to bang his microphone. Brazil’s representative too pointed out the illogicality of China’s position.
Why should rich countries not announce even this unilateral cut? The Chinese delegate said no, and I watched, aghast, as Merkel threw up her hands in despair and conceded the point… China, backed at times by India, then proceeded to take out all the numbers that mattered. A 2020 peaking year in global emissions, essential to restrain temperatures to 2C°, was removed and replaced by woolly language suggesting that emissions should peak “as soon as possible”.
Not only did Chinese and Indian delegates lock themselves in a room alongside other nations of the global south (notably including Sudan), refusing entry of Hillary Clinton and other western puppets attempting to “help” reach a consensus, but the leaders of both nations blocked all binding agreements from being set in stone.
In December 2009, a former chief economic advisor to Putin stated that Russia had sent data to East Anglia’s CRU from 476 meteorological stations covering over 20 percent of the globe’s surface hosting a wide range of data from as far back as 1865 to 2005. Dr. Illarionov explained that he was dismayed to see that Phil Jones and the CRU entirely ignored the data from all but 121 stations.
From those stations they did use, Jones and his team artificially cherry-picked data that gave off the false result that temperatures between 1860-1965 were 0.67 degrees colder than they truly were while temperatures from 1965-2005 were made artificially high. (1)
After being suspended for a few months, a UK review panel absolved Jones from his transgressions and re-installed him into his old position of carbon data gatekeeper at the CRU.
Twelve Years Later
Today, 12 years of propaganda have attempted to wipe Climate Gate from the internet and our collective memory as the same fallacious models and data sets have continued to be used to justify the sort of panicky fear-driven decisions to radically alter civilization forever.
Mark Carney has risen to great heights since his 2009 role steering Canada’s Central Bank through the storm of 2009 to become the head of the Bank of England (2013-2019), trustee of the World Economic Forum, co-founder of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures alongside Michael Bloomberg and leading technocratic manager of the Great Reset program for global governance.
His role as a high priest of green finance has been documented elsewhere, but the thing to keep in mind is that the Carney/WEF version of a green world differs drastically from the approach taken by China, India, Russia and the growing array of nations among the Multipolar alliance.
Two Opposing Paths to a Green Future
How do these approaches to green, sustainable policymaking differ?
Where one defines “sustainable development” as a euphemism for de-growth (and de-population) under a unipolar rules-based international order, the other looks towards “sustained development” as a driving force for long term growth, multipolarism and even population increases premised on large scale capital-intensive infrastructure building.
Where one system increases deserts by spreading solar panels across the face of the earth (and in turn increasing surface temperatures drastically), the other actually greens deserts by careful reclamation, desalination and water diversion programs such as China’s Move South Water North.
Yes, China and India are building a lot of green energy programs and they intend to lower their rates of CO2 output by 2060. However, unlike the post-modern basket cases in the west who are clamoring for a Fourth Industrial Revolution, Eurasian nations are not resting their entire development strategies on windmills and solar panels.
Instead what we find are competent programs for hydropower, oil, coal, natural gas, hydrogen power and importantly next generation nuclear power (with pioneering work on Molten Salt thorium as well as fusion power in the works.
Looking to NASA’s recent surprise discovery that the world’s biomass has increased by over five percent due in large measure to India and China’s economic activity, the fact is slowly emerging into the zeitgeist that the apparent conflict between humanity’s aspirations to grow vs the health of ecosystems is a chimera.
The obvious fact that carbon dioxide also happens to be considered by all chlorophyl-based life to be a delicious food should also not be lost in the rush to demonize CO2.
If we can simply break ourselves free from the imperial operating system attempting to herd the world into a slaughterhouse of a new technocratic feudalism and instead embrace our destiny as a species of creative reason capable of boundless self-perfectibility both on the earth and beyond into the cosmos, then not only could a war be averted in the short term, but a new multipolar cultural renaissance might even emerge.
See more here:
Header image: Youtube
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 


Trackback from your site.

J&J: Children Don’t Need the COVID Vaccine

Published on October 5, 2021Written by

Project Veritas released the third video of its COVID vaccine investigative series today exposing two Johnson & Johnson [J&J] officials, who argue children do not need to take the COVID vaccine, in part because of the potential long-term side effects.

One of the exposed J&J employees, a scientist by the name of Justin Durrant, laughs about inconveniencing unvaccinated adults if they refuse to comply with mandates being imposed upon them:
Justin Durrant, Johnson & Johnson Scientist: “Inconvenience [the unvaccinated] to the point where it’s like, ‘I might as well just f*cking do it [and take the COVID vaccine],’ you know what I’m saying? Like ‘I can’t go out of state,’ I can’t – ‘my grandma’s in Canada and I can’t visit her,’ you know what I’m saying?
You can’t go to France unless you’re vaccinated — you know you’ve just got to keep doing things like that where you’re almost like a second-grade citizen if you’re not vaccinated, but I know that’s awful.”
Veritas Journalist: “You’re almost what?”
Durrant: “Like a second-grade citizen, like you can’t do anything that a normal citizen can do.”
Veritas Journalist: “A second graded citizen?”
Durrant: “Yeah like top grade, like the ones that get it, and the ones that just like — then you can’t do sh*t.”
Veritas Journalist: “So then how do we punish [the unvaccinated]?”
Durrant: “I mean if you can’t work, I feel like that’s punishment enough.”
Veritas Journalist: “People what?”
Durrant: “Only way people really act and comply is if it affects their pockets, like if you’re working for a big company and you’re going to lose your job, best believe you’ll be the first one in line [to take the COVID vaccine].”
Veritas Journalist: “Right, so if you’re working for a big company and you’re about to lose your job, you’ll be the first one in line?”
Durrant: “Yeah.”
Veritas Journalist: “That’s so true. That’s smart, that’s what we need to do.”
Durrant: “That’s what we’re doing.”
Durrant said he does not recommend taking his own company’s vaccine. He asked the Veritas journalist to keep that information private.
“Don’t get the Johnson & Johnson [COVID vaccine], I didn’t tell you though,” he said.
Both Durrant and Brandon Schadt, J&J’s Regional Business Lead, said that applying the COVID vaccine on children would not move the needle in the battle against the pandemic.
“It wouldn’t make that much of a difference” if children are unvaccinated for COVID, Durrant said.
“It’s a kid, you just don’t do that, you know? Not something that’s so unknown in terms of repercussions down the road, you know?” Schadt said. “It’s a kid, it’s a fcking kid, you know? They shouldn’t have to get a fcking [COVID] vaccine, you know?”
Schadt compared J&J’s COVID vaccine efficacy to the other pharmaceutical companies.
“J&J is like stepping in the best smelling pile of sh*t you could step in,” he said.
More footage exposing Big Pharma will be released by Project Veritas imminently. To receive these upcoming videos directly into your email inbox, click here.
See more, and their video, here:
About Project Veritas
James O’Keefe established Project Veritas in 2010 as a non-profit journalism enterprise to continue his undercover reporting work.
Today, Project Veritas investigates and exposes corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions to achieve a more ethical and transparent society and to engage in litigation to: protect, defend and expand human and civil rights secured by law, specifically First Amendment rights including promoting the free exchange of ideas in a digital world; combat and defeat censorship of any ideology; promote truthful reporting; and defend freedom of speech and association issues including the right to anonymity.
O’Keefe serves as the CEO and Chairman of the Board so that he can continue to lead and teach his fellow journalists, as well as protect and nurture the Project Veritas culture. 
Header image: American Academy of Pediatrics
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 


Trackback from your site.