Principia Scientifica

The Rising Up Down Under: Wide-Scale Revolt Against COVID Tyranny

by

Published on January 11, 2022Written by rumble.com

Australia is burning, literally. Last week anti-lockdown protesters set fire to the Old Parliament building in the capital of Canberra.

Meanwhile in Melbourne, the nerve center of Covid panic, a man protested vaccine insanity by dousing himself with gasoline and setting himself on fire.
You can be forgiven if you didn’t hear about any of this, because our own media has done its best to avoid reporting the full truth of what’s happening in the newly-reborn prison colony of Australia.
We aren’t afraid, though.
We’re joined in the video beow by Maria Zee, our on-the-ground correspondent in Australia:

See more here: rumble.com
Header image: CNN
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

A Cruel, Sickening and Never-ending Witch Hunt

by

Published on January 11, 2022Written by Dr Vernon Coleman

The supporters of the covid fraud, and the fake jabbing programme, are now complaining that they have been getting a rough time at the hands of what they delight in referring to as the ‘anti-vaxxers’.

Allegedly, some have even had to put up with rude comments on social media.
They have no idea what abuse really looks like.
I’ve spent a lifetime being attacked and vilified and oppressed and I’ve never known anything as deadly and as destructive as the abuse I’ve been subjected to in the last two years.
Let me explain a little.
At the age of 18 I went to Kirkby, Liverpool to spend a year as a Community Service Volunteer.
I arrived as a schoolboy, in a school blazer, tie and flannels.
Nine months later I had seen more of life than I’d seen in the previous 18 years. I had become a professional rebel – fighting for freedom and human rights and against injustices of all kinds.
I spent much of the mid and late 1960s writing articles and columns which were critical of the establishment. (I was writing columns while I was still at medical school.)
To begin with the establishment was tolerant. Books such as ‘The Medicine Men’ and ‘Paper Doctors’, both published in the 1970s, were widely praised. The Guardian newspaper bought serial rights for the first and published a huge extract. The BBC made a programme about it.
During the 1970s and early 1980s I worked a good deal for both broadsheet and tabloid newspapers and for national TV stations. I wrote numerous columns and made several thousand TV and radio programmes. And I wrote a host of books which were mostly very well received and reviewed – appearing in the best-seller lists around the world.
I was sued, served with injunctions and fined by the NHS for insisting on maintaining patient confidentiality. (I resigned as a GP and my protest resulted in a change in the regulations.)
But then, at the end of the 1980s, there was a not very subtle change in the way the establishment treated original thinking: anyone who questioned the `official’ line was either actively suppressed or attacked. Any questioning of vaccination or vivisection, for example, drew violent attacks from the medical establishment and, in particular, from the pharmaceutical industry.
As a result of my campaigns, I was sued by a police force. (And I sued one back.) I had MI5, special branch and private detectives (hired by drug companies) chasing me and tracking me down. I was attacked by two judges. I received writs so thick that they could only be pushed through a cat flap. I had papers stolen from my home.
Overnight, I was banned in China where the Chinese Government was so annoyed by a weekly column I wrote for a big Chinese newspaper that they banned all my books in Chinese and also banned other ‘foreign’ authors. (I was a bestselling author in China and wrote a weekly column for a Chinese newspaper). The column which caused the fuss was one in which I criticised vaccination. I have no idea whether or not this global ban on western authors has yet been rescinded.
A serious death threat was investigated by Interpol. My mail was opened and my phone was tapped. Every time I spoke in public I was filmed. Two separate insiders told me that Special Branch had a growing file about me. I’ve been door stepped by journalists on more occasions than I like to remember.
When I travelled to South Africa to speak against vivisection, I was met by an agent of BOSS within hours of arriving in Johannesburg. He wasn’t terribly good at it (he turned up in a silk suit claiming to be an anti-vivisection activist) but he wanted to know everything about `my friend ALF’ (he didn’t realise ALF was an organisation not a person).
After I exposed the way the AIDS ‘crisis’ has been exaggerated, I found that I was no longer invited to contribute to TV or radio programmes. And publishers around the world suddenly let my books go out of print or remaindered them – and refused to consider new titles. My German publishers had been selling large amounts of my books but the books disappeared overnight and the following year I received nothing.
The publishers did not respond when I asked for royalty statements or sent them other titles. That cost me around £30,000 a year in royalties – and a lot of readers in Germany. Much the same sort of thing happened around the world. You can see how it works, can’t you?
And if you want to know why I never borrow money just read the book `Roche v Adams’ which describes Stanley Adams experiences with drug company Roche and the EU. The world is scarier and nastier than most people realise.
By the end of the 20th century, doctors were only allowed to read and hear what the drug industry wants them to read and hear.
So, for example, consider what happened 25 or so years ago when I was invited to speak at a high level conference in London aimed at medical professionals – particularly NHS staff.
The conference was, I was told, intended to tackle the subject of medication errors and adverse reactions to prescribed drugs. The company organising the conference asked me (whom they acknowledged as an expert on iatrogenesis) to help decide the programme for the conference – and to speak. They had asked me, they said, because my campaigns had resulted in more drugs being banned or controlled than anyone else’s.
And then the direction of the conference suddenly changed.
The aim became to discuss how patients could be educated to use drugs more sensibly. Doctors and drug companies were no longer to be regarded as having any responsibility. I was quietly fired (but paid because I had a contract) after complaints had been made by unnamed people. I was replaced by representatives of The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.
That sort of thing happened a good deal. Book contracts were suddenly withdrawn and TV companies cancelled invitations. Publishers suddenly decided that they didn’t want books they’d been keen to buy. By the late 1990s, nasty articles about me started to appear in the national press – a trend which was, I believe, initiated by drug companies.
And then came covid-19.
In February and March of 2020, I began by attacking the establishment, questioning the argument that the coronavirus was going to be a major plague. That proved deeply unpopular with the medical and political establishment. Overnight, without any evidence, I became a conspiracy theorist, a discredited doctor and a danger to mankind.
Twenty years previously I’d been allotted a Wikipedia page.
Suddenly it was changed.
All details of my books, TV series and columns were removed and replaced with lies and nonsense. The fact that I had resigned as a GP on point of principle was erased. The fact that I had resigned from my last national newspaper column because the editor wouldn’t print a column I had written criticising the Iraq War was erased. I was reported to be the highest paid columnist in Fleet Street at the time so it was a painful principle.
Wikipedia pages which had been put up about two of my book series (Mrs Caldicot and Bilbury) mysteriously disappeared. Google, which has a ‘relationship’ with Wikipedia, repeated the lies and general garbage about me. It was clear this was all designed to make sure that no one took any notice of what I had to say. It was pretty clearly also designed to destroy me personally and to wreck my book sales. (One or two people have, I think, tried to restore sense to the page. No one has succeeded.)
I was guilty of spreading misinformation because the truth I was telling was considered inconvenient. I was wrongly accused of having been struck off the medical register. I was even accused of falsely claiming to be a doctor. I was accused of making my videos (never monetised, remember) to make money before I die.
Within a few months of starting to make videos for YouTube I was getting millions of views. I acquired 200,000 subscribers in record time.
Suddenly YouTube started to take down videos. (They have so far removed about half. They took down two over the Christmas period – both were published over a year earlier. They did not break any of the channel’s absurd allegiance to the World Health Organisation.) Nothing in the videos I made was factually inaccurate. But YouTube doesn’t seem to care about freedom or truth.
Incidentally, I never monetised my videos because it seemed wrong to benefit financially from such a crisis. And, more important, I didn’t want adverts appearing on or next to my videos.) For around 18 months YouTube has, it seems to me, only accepted covid videos which promote the pro-vaxx, pro fraud line.
I moved to the excellent platform Brand New Tube and started making videos there.
My website had been hacked and attacked for decades but things got worse. For two years there have been at least 5,000 hacking attempts every month on the two main sites. Occasionally, one or other website has been taken down. I have been hacked by the Americans (including at least two of the various alphabet soup organisationss), the Russians and the South Koreans and an assortment of dangerous nutters.
During the last two years, half a century of hard work and campaigning has been trashed and my reputation has been steadily destroyed by lies and libels on the internet and in the mainstream media. The BBC and Sky TV both attacked me. The Daily Mail (for which I had once worked as a medical advisor) even claimed that I wrongly called myself a doctor.
Malignant armies of tweeters, claiming to be on the same side as me (and who had never done a darned thing in this war except whinge and promote themselves) lied and accused me of being a freemason, struck off the medical register and worse. All the network TV and radio stations ignored me – although I had previously appeared on many of them regularly. (I used to be a regular on TalkRadio for example.)
And I have, inevitably, been threatened with legal action – for absolutely no valid reason whatsoever.
Privately and professionally, exposing the covid hoax was the worst thing I ever did. It has brought me and my beloved, hard-working and constantly loyal wife nothing but personal and professional pain.
The aim of the attacks was not, of course, just to destroy me – it was to stop people listening to me. Before March 2020 I had many millions of readers around the world. I wonder how many I have left now. Precious few, I suspect. How do people know or care that the word ‘discredited’, plucked out of thin air and applied to my name by a crooked, fake encyclopaedia called Wikipedia, widely spread by that evil search engine Google, is just a libel and not a fact? (I have evidence showing that it is possible to change a Wikipedia entry by paying an editor.)
And this sort of defamation doesn’t just break and silence the individuals who are targeted – it also dissuades others from speaking out.
I was never allowed to join Facebook or Twitter. Facebook told me, before I did anything, that I was a threat to their community. And I was thrown off LinkedIn for daring to mention that it was owned by Microsoft – the source of the wealth of billionaire pro-vaxxer Bill Gates.
Four books I wrote about covid were banned. Publishers suddenly withdrew them from sale. They might as well reintroduce book burning globally. (The four banned books are available free on my websites.)
I was expelled from the Royal Society of Arts because of my views and my recent involvement in the BBC panorama programme. That’s what they said.
The Panorama programme was, of course, the unbalanced, biased programme where I was attacked for telling the truth but not invited into the studio to debate because the BBC boasts that it won’t ever give airtime to those questioning vaccination `whether they’re right or wrong’.
As far as the RSA is concerned, the words crushing freedom of speech and ignoring the principles of a fair trial came to mind.
Criticising me for being demonised on Panorama is like criticising someone for being struck by lightning or, more accurately, being mugged.
I don’t give a fig that they’ve expelled me but it’s a good example of how the truth is being suppressed, how the truth-tellers are being demonised and exiled and how old-fashioned stuff like facts and medical debate are being oppressed.
The RSA also complained that Fellows had been tweeting about me. And so on and so forth. Not unexpectedly, the heavy hand of the BBC appeared. One of the tweeters complaining about me appears to have been someone called Catrin Nye, whom I have never heard of. However, it appears that there is a BBC presenter called Catrin Nye whose photograph looks rather like the Twitter account holder who tweeted about me.
Maybe they are related. If so, that’s rather neat. The BBC attacks me for telling the truth and then a BBC person tweets about me and the RSA, instead of rallying round or looking for the truth, expels me for allowing this to happen. (What a coincidence it is that from the beginning of this fraud I have been attacking the BBC for its lack of journalistic integrity.)
You couldn’t make it up, could you? But it wasn’t the first time. Years earlier, I was invited to leave the Royal Society of Medicine where I was a Fellow.
And so on, and so on.
I’ve told you this sorry tale of unbridled persecution because it proves just how desperately dishonest the whole enterprise really is. If they were honest they would debate with me, believing they’d win. But they can’t debate because they’d lose so they try to win by spreading vicious lies.
This isn’t normal, unpleasant social media abuse. It is a campaign of suppression and oppression, decorated with malicious lies, invented and spread to cause doubt and to help keep the truth suppressed. The ruthlessness and cruelty and refusal to debate are evidence of the fundamental wickedness.
There are thousands of so-called fact checkers in the world and I suspect that most of them, supported by organisations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, have, by now, libelled me and falsely accused me of spreading misinformation. (I dealt with three fact checkers in a recent video.) No one cares that everything I have said or written has been meticulously checked and been accurate.
Even the Wikipedia site relating to the award winning movie of my novel Mrs Caldicot’s Cabbage War has been deliberately changed. The film had terrific reviews in the national press, it is regularly shown on TV and has over 1,000 reviews at nearly 5 stars on Amazon but Wikipedia now shows only a BBC one star review.
My name has been removed from the summary box so that I’m not included on other derivative sites and the only time I’m mentioned as the author, I’m described, inevitably, as a conspiracy theorist. The aim, yet again, is to destroy my reputation and income.
It just goes to show how terrified the establishment is of the truth – Wikipedia, which poses as an encyclopaedia, is, in my view, corrupt and a tool of the establishment; it is a disinformation site, spreading misinformation and manipulated by amateur `editors’. I still find it astonishing that Wikipedia editors will remove the lies from a page if you give them money. Then when it gets changed back they want more money to tidy it up again.
At least one of the editors named as responsible for altering my Wikipedia page has, according to Larry Sanger (Wikipedia’s co-founder), suspected links to the CIA.
And still the abuse continues – so much so that even many people on my side of this war no longer want to speak to me. Many admit that they won’t put my videos on their Twitter or Facebook channels lest they be punished. I’ve been made a dangerous pariah – attacked or ignored by both sides in this war.
In addition, I have, for reasons which puzzle me, been targeted by exosome supporters who believe that viruses don’t exist, that infections don’t exist and therefore cannot be spread, and that when four people in a family or an office develop a cold or the flu it is just a coincidence. I know darned well that even if I believed in this (and I’ve known about exosomes longer than some of the supporters of the theory have been able to tie their own shoelaces) I could never persuade the public to believe it.
The exosome supporters have done everything they can to damage my credibility – even though I was the first medical doctor to stick my neck out over what was originally the coronavirus hoax. They persecute me mercilessly, lie about me endlessly and do not seem to understand how their close-minded, bigotry is damaging our chances of winning the war. (Or do they?)
One recently claimed that I had said nothing about compulsory vaccination or social credit. But I was warning about mandatory vaccinations over a decade ago and I have repeatedly warned about it in the last two years.
I warned about it in my first video in March 2020. And I was warning about social credit when it was still an experiment in China years ago.
I was writing about the danger of lockdowns and masks and PCR tests over eighteen months ago. I was warning about the theft of DNA, digital passports, the end of cash, food and energy shortages in the early part of 2020.
Over a year ago, in December 2020, I accurately listed the side effects that would come with the mRNA jab. Everything I’ve written was accurate.
My predictions are correct time and time again. And yet the exosome supporters merely spew vitriol and lie after lie. If I defend myself they become ever more vicious. And when attached to my videos, the lies just sit there because if I remove them I’m accused of censorship.
So, if I make more videos I shall never again open the comments section.
Over Christmas I received a death threat from an anonymous exosome supporter and two people created fake Telegram channels in my name. Heaven knows what they are saying in my name – I’m not allowed on social media. I patented my name decades ago and so the thieves who have stolen my name and photograph are guilty of fraud, libel and patent infringement.
They have been reported to Telegram. But it’s more time and energy wasted. I realise that the channels could be harmless – but, given what has happened, how could I possibly believe that they are?
I have absolutely no accounts on social media and anything which appears under my name on Facebook, Twitter, Telegram or whatever is fraudulent, fake and libellous. (It can, by the way, be libellous to write something purporting to have been written by another person.)
Part of me wants desperately to carry on fighting this war. It is the most important war any of us will ever fight in. I still have a good deal of important information to share.
I honestly believe that if any of the pro-vaxxers have been subjected to a hundredth of the abuse I’ve described (much of it paid for or encouraged by governments or government agencies) I will be surprised. Most of them have, instead, been rewarded with wealth and honours.
Part of me just wants to pull up the drawbridge, draw the curtains and shut out the world – though I will keep writing articles for my websites.
I still believe we are winning this war. But, as I said in my last video, I feel just a little bit tired, shell shocked and battle weary.
I think I’m beginning to feel my age.
I’m beginning to feel I should buy some slippers and a pipe, light the log fire a few feet from my favourite chair and pick up a favourite book.
We’ll see…watch this space!
See more here: vernoncoleman.org
Header image: La Pense
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

Covid Vax Death Rate 21 Times Higher Than All Other Vaxxes!

by

Published on January 11, 2022Written by Pierre Gosselin

German site Transparenztest.de has compared the figures for adverse events of COVID mRNA vaccines with other vaccines. The results are nothing less than frightening

Citing the figures in the current safety report of Germany’s renowned Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) from December 23, 2021, Transparenztest.de found “frightening” results:
“In the last eleven months, four times as many suspected adverse reaction reports and four times as many deaths in absolute numbers were reported for COVID vaccines alone than in the last 20 years for the totality of all vaccines used in Germany.”
Using the PEI’s latest updated figures, a total of 123,347,849 doses of COVID mRNA vaccine had been administered in Germany up to November 30th, 2021. Correspondingly 196,974 adverse drug reactions (ADR) were reported, of which 1,919 were deaths.
Meanwhile during the period of 2000-2020, some 625,500,000 doses of all other vaccines were given, of which there were only 54,448 ADRs, of which 456 were deaths.
18 times more ADRs per million
When one compares the ADRs per million doses, there were 18 times more ADRs per million doses for COVID mRNA vaccines than for all the other vaccines:

Comparison of ADRs per million vaccine doses in Germany. Red = COVID mRNA vaccines up to November 30, 2021; blue = all other vaccines total 2000-2020. There’s an 18-fold more suspected cases with COVID vaccines compared to all other vaccines from 2000-2020. Chart: Transparenztest.de
Shocking ADR reports for deaths
When it comes to deaths from the mRNA vaccines, the results compared to all other vaccines are astonishingly shocking.
The following chart compares the COVID mRNA vaccine deaths per million doses in Germany to all other vaccines administered from 2000-2020:

Using the raw data from the December 23, 2021 PEI safety report, DB-UAW database, the above chart is a comparison of COVID mRNA vaccinations up to 30 Nov 2021 (black) vs all vaccines 2000-2020 (gray) in deaths per 1,000,000 vaccine doses. Chart: Transparenztest.de. 
In terms of presumed deaths per 1,000,000 vaccine doses, there are 21 times as many deaths with COVID vaccines as with all other vaccines vaccinated in Germany in the period 2000-2020. Expressed as a percentage, that is 2,200 percent.
Huge underreporting
A meta-study by Hazell et. al suggested that the average of “underreporting” in ADR databases was 94 percent. And according to a PEI report, the rate of reported suspected cases may be as low as five percent.
Moreover, according to the FDA and CDC-operated VAERS vaccination database, the rate of reported cases is only one percent. The number of unreported cases is thus estimated at 99 percent. Deaths and injuries are extremely likely far more widespread.
Using the 95 percent figure for underreporting, Germany’s deaths from COVID mRNA vaccines thus would be 38,380 deaths. Note: this figure is only an estimate and an extrapolation based on underreporting.

Every booster more potentially lethal

Also extremely worrisome is that data show how the rate of ADRs rises with each COVID booster shot. The more boosters a patient takes, the greater the risk of suffering an ADR becomes.

Transparenztest.de also produced a chart showing the higher risk after a triple vaccination (booster), depending on the vaccination dose. What follows is a comparison of ADR reports: Deaths per 1,000,000 vaccine doses after triple vaccination (booster)

Transparenztest.de, raw data PEI safety report December 23, 2021, DB-UAW database. Comparison COVID mRNA vaccination (black) vs all vaccines 2000-2020 (gray) in deaths per 1,000,000 vaccine doses after triple vaccination, (booster). Chart: Transparenztest.de
Transparenztest.de summarizes:
The results are frightening. The difference factor to the other vaccinations increases by a factor of 43. With each additional vaccination dose (booster 4 / 5), the ratio worsens accordingly, or the risk of side effects resulting in death increases. The same applies, of course, to all other side effects.”
See more here: notrickszone.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

The sinking ship that the Covid-crazy rats are fleeing

by

Published on January 11, 2022Written by Tom Woods

There’s a particular sinking ship from which the rats are ostentatiously fleeing; the “keep schools closed” ship.
Now before I get lectured to, let me note: I couldn’t possibly be a bigger opponent of soul-crushing schools that teach kids propaganda.
But I promise you: that’s not the reason all the blue checks have urged us to keep schools closed.
It was all fact-free hysteria, and I’m just flat-out against that no matter what the cause is.
I would never say: “Dr. Fauci is my ally because I don’t like the public school system and he favors closing it.” Dr. Fauci is never my ally, ever.
And the blue checks are reversing themselves on this faster than you can believe.
When the teachers’ unions have lost the blue checks, the polling on keeping schools closed must be horrendous.
I am no fan of Eric Adams, the new mayor of New York, since he favors the evil and useless vaccine passport system, which can never be excused.
But I find it politically interesting that he’s been saying things like this:
“I was a cook. I was a dishwasher. If nobody came to my restaurant when I was in college, I wouldn’t have been able to survive. When you talk about closing down our city, you’re talking about putting low-wage workers out of a job. I’m not letting that happen.”
And about schools specifically, in defiance of the teacher’s unions:
“We want to be extremely clear. The safest place for our children is in a school building. And we are going to keep our schools open….
“We’re not sending an unclear message of what is going to happen day to day. I’m going to tell you what’s going to happen day to day. We are staying open….
“I know there’s questions about staffing, I know there’s questions about testing — there’s a lot of questions. But we’re going to turn those question marks into an exclamation point. We are staying open.”
Let’s also take a look at Ashish Jha, who’s currently at Brown University. He’s been downright nasty through this whole ordeal — compare his conduct to that of the decent and civilized Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford, for instance — and has placed impossible obstacles in the way of school reopening: tying it to rates of “community spread,” demanding onerous measures to ensure “physical safety,” even while mountains of evidence piled up that schools were not unsafe places.
(Sweden’s 1.8 million children all managed to avoid death, and their teachers did better than other professions, while having open schools without masking.)
Then Jha demanded the masking of students, and even told Congress: “No expert that I know of doesn’t believe masking is helpful for kids.”
Sure, Ashish. I’m sure you’ve never, ever encountered an expert who advises against masking kids — even though I myself, not even a member of the medical community, can somehow name you a whole slate of them.
And now, just this week, watch the pivot.
Here’s Jha on Twitter on January 4:
At every turn during this pandemic we have deprioritized children and their well-being. The educational losses and mental health tolls will be felt for their lifetimes. Great @DLeonhardt thread on how American kids are in a crisis and many don’t fully grasp how bad it is
It’s one thing to offer a sincere and profound apology for your errors in the past. It’s quite another all of a sudden to claim to care about the well-being of children when you yourself have been part of the dystopia that has targeted them.
Now, this has been altogether too much discussion of schools without at least a nod to homeschooling, so let me say this:
The wackos are in charge, imposing crazy and useless so-called safety measures, and (as usual) teaching wacko propaganda.
But homeschooling seems too hard. I completely understand that.
Header image: BBC
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

Climate-Related Deaths Hit Record Low In 2021

by

Published on January 10, 2022Written by Bjorn Lomborg

Fewer and fewer people die from climate-related natural disasters. This is even true of 2021 — despite breathless climate reporting, almost 99 percent fewer people died that year than a hundred years ago.

Why is this consistently not reported?
Over the past hundred years, annual climate-related deaths have declined by more than 96 percent. In the 1920s, the death count from climate-related disasters was 485,000 on average every year. In the last full decade, 2010-2019, the average was 18,362 dead per year or 96.2 percent lower.
In the first year of the new decade, 2020, the number of dead was even lower at 14,885 — 97 perent lower than the 1920s average.
For 2021, which is now complete, we see an even lower total of 6,134 dead or a reduction since the 1920s of 98.7 percent.
You heard a lot about some deadly climate catastrophes in 2021 — the US/Canada heat dome, the floodings in Germany and Belgium, the US February winter storm. All of these deaths are included in the graph.
Possibly not surprising, most people never heard of the disastrous floods in India during the monsoon, killing more than a thousand people across India, two flash floods in Afghanistan killing 376 people, hurricanes hitting China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and India, killing 776 people, and more than 200 other catastrophes.
All of these catastrophes are measured by the most respected global database, the International Disaster Database.
There is some uncertainty about complete reporting from the early decades, which is why this graph starts in 1920, and if anything, this uncertainty means the graph underestimates the reduction in deaths.
Also, the database has big problems with heat and cold deaths, where there is much more reporting on heat deaths (which it includes), but globally, cold deaths outweigh heat deaths 9:1.
That climate deaths are becoming much rarer is the opposite of what you hear, but that is because we’re often just being told of one disaster after another – telling us how many events are happening.
The number of reported events is increasing but that is mainly due to better reporting, lower thresholds, better accessibility (the CNN effect), [and better technology]. For instance, for Denmark, the database only shows events starting from 1976.
Instead, look at the number of dead per year, which is much harder to fudge. Given that these numbers fluctuate enormously from year to year (especially in the past, with huge droughts and floods in China and elsewhere), they are here presented as averages of each decade (1920-29, 1930-39, etc.).
If we look at the absolute number of people dying from climate-related disasters, it is simply incontrovertible that these have declined dramatically. This is because richer and more resilient societies are much better able to protect their citizens.
Notice, this does not mean that there is no global warming or that possibly a climate signal could eventually lead to further deaths. Global warming is a real problem that we should fix smartly.
But panic from bad media reporting, scaring kids and adults alike, does not help us be smart.
The graph below shows us that our increased wealth and increased adaptive capacity has vastly overshadowed any potential negative impact from the climate when it comes to human-climate vulnerability.
This is an update of my graph in my 2020 peer-reviewed article which you can read for free here.

See more here: climatechangedispatch.com
Header image: BBC
Editor’s note: If this is mentioned in the mainstream media at all, which it probably won’t be, it will be to say Bjorn’s chart is incorrect. They will then go on to tell you climate-related deaths are increasing every year.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

Massive Surge in Number of New Satellites in Earth Orbit

by

Published on January 10, 2022Written by Arthur Firstenberg

While the attention of a terrified world has been rivetedon a virus, and while concern about radiation has been focused on 5G on the ground, the assault on the heavens has reached astronomical proportions.

During the past two years, the number of satellites circling the earth has increased from 2,000 to 4,800, and a flood of new projects has brought the number of operating, approved, and proposed satellites to at least 441,449. And that number only includes low-earth-orbit (LEO) satellites that will reside in the ionosphere.
The satellite projects include the ones listed below. The companies are based in the United States unless otherwise indicated.

17,270 satellites already approved by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission:

Amazon (Kuiper) – 3,236 satellites

Astro Digital – 30 satellites

Black Sky Global – 36 satellites

Boeing – 147 satellites

Capella Space Corp. – 7 satellites

Globalstar (operating since 2000) – 48 satellites

Hawkeye 360 – 80 satellites

ICEYE – 6 satellites (FINLAND)

Iridium (operating since 1998) – 66 satellites

Kepler Communications – 140 satellites (CANADA)

Loft Orbital – 11 satellites

OneWeb – 720 satellites (UNITED KINGDOM)

Planet Labs (operating) – 200 satellites

R2 Space, LLC – 8 satellites

Spire Global – 175 satellites

SpaceX – 11,943 satellites

Swarm – 150 satellites

Telesat – 117 satellites (CANADA)

Theia Holdings – 120 satellites

Umbra Lab – 6 satellites

Viasat – 24 satellites

Applications for 65,912 satellites pending before the FCC:

Amazon (Kuiper) – 4,538 additional satellites

AST & Science – 243 satellites

Astra Space – 13,620 satellites

Boeing – 5,789 additional satellites

Black Sky Global – 14 additional satellites

Fleet Space Technologies – 40 satellites (AUSTRALIA)

Hughes Network Systems – 1,440 satellites

Inmarsat – 198 satellites (UNITED KINGDOM)

Kepler Communications – two additional constellations of 360 satellites and 212 satellites (CANADA)

Lynk Global – 10 satellites (HONG KONG)

Maxar Technologies – 12 satellites

New Spectrum – 30 satellites (CANADA)

OneWeb – 6,368 additional satellites (UNITED KINGDOM)

Orbital Sidekick – 6 satellites

SN Space Systems – 1,190 satellites (UNITED KINGDOM)

SpaceX – 30,000 additional satellites

Telesat – 1,554 additional satellites (CANADA)

Terra Bella – 24 satellites (15 already operating)

Viasat – 264 additional satellites

Constellations totaling 14,872 satellites announced by governments:

Guowang – 12,992 satellites (CHINA)

Roscosmos – 264 satellites named Marathon (RUSSIA)

Roscosmos – 640 satellites named Sfera (RUSSIA)

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency – 20 satellites (U.S. MILITARY)

Space Development Agency – 500 satellites (U.S. MILITARY)

UN:IO – 400 satellites (EUROPEAN COMMISSION)

Yaogan – 76 satellites (already operating) (CHINESE MILITARY)

Other LEO constellations planned by U.S. and foreign companies, totaling more than 16,055 satellites:

4pi Lab – 16 satellites (CANADA)

ADA Space – 192 satellites (CHINA)

Aerospacelab – two constellations (unknown number of satellites) (BELGIUM)

Aistech – 20 satellites (SPAIN)

Albedo Space – 24 satellites

Alpha Insights – unknown number (CANADA)

Analytical Space – 36 satellites (under contract with U.S. SPACE FORCE)

Apogee Networks – 18 satellites (NEW ZEALAND)

Astrocast – 100 satellites (SWITZERLAND)

Astrome – 198 satellites (INDIA)

Aurora Insight – 12 satellites

Avant Space – 30 satellites (RUSSIA) equipped with lasers to serve as a billboard in space to display advertisements

Axelspace – 50 satellites (JAPAN)

BeetleSat – 80 satellites (ISRAEL)

Canon – 100 satellites (JAPAN)

Capella Space Corp. – 29 additional satellites

Carbon Mapper – 20 satellites

Care Weather – 50 satellites

Chang Guang – 138 satellites (CHINA)

China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation – 80 satellites (CHINA)

Climavision – 50 satellites

Commsat – 72 satellites (8 already operating) (CHINA)

ConstellR – 30 satellites (GERMANY)

Curvalux – 240 satellites (UNITED KINGDOM)

Earth Observant – 30 satellites

EarthDaily Analytics – 6 satellites (CANADA)

Earth-i – 15 satellites (UNITED KINGDOM)

EchoStar – 30 satellites (CANADA)

Elecnor Deimos – unknown number (SPAIN)

EOSAgriSat – 12 satellites

Eutelsat – 25 satellites (FRANCE)

ExactEarth (operating) – 68 satellites (CANADA)

Fleet Space – 60 additional satellites (AUSTRALIA)

Future Navigation – 120 satellites (CHINA)

GalaxEye – 15 satellites (INDIA)

Galaxy Space – 1,000 satellites (CHINA)

Geely – unknown number (CHINA)

GeoOptics – 50 satellites

GHG Sat – 10 satellites (CANADA)

GP Advanced Projects – 9 satellites (ITALY)

Guodian Gauke – 38 satellites (CHINA)

Hanwha Systems – 2,000 satellites (SOUTH KOREA)

HEAD Aerospace – 48 satellites (CHINA)

Hera Systems – 50 satellites

Horizon Technologies – 13 satellites (UNITED KINGDOM)

Hydrosat – 16 satellites

Hypersat – 6 satellites

ICEYE – has already launched 14 satellites and plans 18, for 12 more satellites than have been approved by the FCC (FINLAND)

Innova Space – 100 satellites (ARGENTINA)

iQPS – 36 satellites (JAPAN)

Kinéis – 25 satellites (FRANCE)

KLEO – 300 satellites – (GERMANY)

Kleos Space – 80 satellites (LUXEMBOURG)

Lacuna Space – 240 satellites (UNITED KINGDOM)

Launchspace – 124 satellites

LunaSonde – unknown number (UNITED KINGDOM)

Lynk Global – 4,990 additional satellites (HONG KONG)

LyteLoop – 6 satellites

MDA – unknown number

Mission Space – unknown number (LATVIA)

Modularity Space – 150 satellites

Muon Space – unknown number

Myriota – 50 satellites (AUSTRALIA)

NanoAvionics – 72 satellites (LITHUANIA)

Ningxia – 10 satellites (CHINA)

NorthStar – 52 satellites (CANADA)

OHB Italia – 20 satellites (ITALY)

Omnispace – 200 satellites

OQ Technology – 60 satellites (LUXEMBOURG)

Orbital Micro Systems – 40 satellites

OroraTech – 100 satellites (GERMANY)

PION Labs – unknown number (BRAZIL)

PIXXEL – 36 satellites (INDIA)

PlanetIQ – 20 satellites

PredaSAR – 48 satellites

Prométhée – unknown number (FRANCE)

QEYNet – unknown number (CANADA)

QianSheng – 20 satellites (CHINA)

Reaktor Space Lab – 36 satellites (FINLAND)

Rocket Lab – “Mega-constellation” of unknown number (NEW ZEALAND)

Rogue Space Systems – 40 satellites

Rovial – unknown number (FRANCE)

Saab – 100 satellites (SWEDEN)

SaraniaSat – unknown number

Sateliot – 100 satellites (SPAIN)

Satellogic – 90 satellites (ARGENTINA)

SatRevolution – 1500 satellites (POLAND)

Scanworld – 10 satellites (BELGIUM)

Scepter and ExxonMobil – 24 satellites

SCOUT – unknown number

Shanghai Lizheng – 90 satellites (CHINA)

Skykraft – 210 satellites (AUSTRALIA)

Space JLTZ – 200 satellites (MEXICO)

Space Union – 32 satellites (LITHUANIA)

SpaceBelt – 12 satellites

SpaceFab – unknown number

Spacety – 56 satellites (CHINA)

Stara Space – 120 satellites

Startical – 200 satellites (SPAIN)

Sternula – 50 satellites (DENMARK)

Synspective – 30 satellites (JAPAN)

Telnet – 30 satellites (TUNISIA)

Tomorrow.io – 36 satellites

Totum Labs – 24 satellites

Trion Space – 288 satellites (LIECHTENSTEIN)

Trustpoint – unknown number

Umbra Lab – 18 additional satellites

UnseenLabs – 50 satelites (FRANCE)

Vyoma Space – unknown number (GERMANY)

WiseSat Space – unknown number (SWITZERLAND)

Xona – 300 satellites

ZeroG Lab – 378 satellites (CHINA)

Zhuhai Orbita – 34 satellites (CHINA)

Rwanda, which wants to catapult Africa into world leadership in space, filed an application with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) on September 21, 2021 for 327,320 satellites. Its proposal includes 937 orbital planes, distributed in 27 orbital shells (layers of satellites at different altitudes), with 360 satellites in each plane.

TOTAL: 441,449 SATELLITES OPERATING, APPROVED AND PROPOSED (+18 constellations whose numbers are not yet known)

Most of the above list of satellites would orbit at altitudes between about 325 km (200 miles) and 1,100 km (680 miles), except that some of Rwanda’s proposed orbits go as low as 280 km (174 miles). The above list does not include applications for satellites in geostationary orbit (GEO), or for LEO constellations of fewer than 5 satellites, or constellations in medium earth orbit (MEO) such as:

Intelsat (at 8600 km) – 216 satellites (LUXEMBOURG)

Mangata Networks (at 6,400 km and 12,000 km) – 791 satellites

O3b (at 8,062 km) – 112 satellites (LUXEMBOURG)

BRIGHTENING THE NIGHT SKY
Scientists have already begun to publish papers analyzing the effect all these satellites will have, not only on astronomy, but on the appearance of the night sky and the visibility of the stars to everyone on earth. An article published online on March 29, 2021 in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society by scientists in Slovakia, Spain and the United States is titled “The proliferation of space objects is a rapidly increasing source of artificial night sky brightness.”
The scattering of sunlight from all of the objects in space, wrote the authors, is causing a “new skyglow” during the beginning and end of each night that has already brightened the natural night sky by about 10 percent. The authors are concerned that “the additional contribution of the new satellite mega-constellations” would ruin the night sky to a much greater extent.

A group of Canadian astronomers have an article in the January 2022 issue of The Astronomical Journal. “Megaconstellations of thousands to tens of thousands of artificial satellites (satcons) are rapidly being developed and launched,” they write. “These satcons will have negative consequences for observational astronomy research, and are poised to drastically interfere with naked-eye stargazing worldwide.”
They analyzed what the effect on astronomy will be if 65,000 new low-orbit satellites are launched. At 40 degrees latitude (mid-United States; Mediterranean; mid-China; Japan; Buenos Aires; New Zealand), say these authors, more than 1,000 of these satellites will be sunlit and visible in the sky in the summer even at midnight. At higher latitudes (northern U.S.; Canada; most of Europe; Russia), thousands of these satellites will be visible all night long.
Another paper, titled Report on Mega-Constellations to the Government of Canada and the Canadian Space Agency, was commissioned by the Canadian Astronomical Society and submitted to the Canadian government on March 31, 2021. It is a moving document. These astronomers write:“In ancient times, humans everywhere in the world had access to completely dark skies. In stark contrast, today 80 percent of North Americans cannot see the Milky Way from where they live because of light pollution. The lack of darkness that many people now experience due to urban light pollution has been linked to many physical and mental health issues, both in humans and wildlife.
But there are still pockets of darkness where urban-dwellers can escape the light pollution and experience skies nearly as dark as those seen by our ancestors. Unfortunately, light pollution from satellites will be a global phenomenon — there will be nowhere left on Earth to experience skies free from bright satellites in orbit.

“Anyone who has ever spent time in a truly dark place staring up at the stars understands the powerful feeling of connection and insignificance this act inspires. Our lives, our worries, even our entire planet seem so inconsequential on these scales — a feeling that has shaped literature, art, and culture around the globe. Seeing the night sky makes it immediately obvious that we are part of a vast and wondrous universe full of countless stars… Connecting to the sky is part of our humanity, and everyone in the world is in very real danger of losing that…
“With the naked eye, stargazing from a dark-sky location allows you to see about 4,500 stars… Once Starlink approaches 12,000 satellites in orbit, most people in Canada will see more satellites than stars in the sky.”

THE WORLD’S LARGEST GARBAGE PIT
And not only do thousands of whole satellites threaten the heavens, but a phenomenal amount of debris orbits the earth as a result of satellites colliding, or exploding, or otherwise being destroyed while in space. During the 64 years that humans have been launching rockets, the protective blankets of the ionosphere and magnetosphere have become the Earth’s largest garbage pit.

According to the European Space Agency there are, in orbit around the Earth today, 7,790 intact satellites, of which 4,800 are functioning. Since 1957, there have been more than 630 breakups, explosions, collisions, and other satellite-destroying events. This has resulted in the creation of more than 9,700 tons of space debris. There are, in orbit today:

36,500 objects larger than 10 cm in size

1,000,000 objects from 1 cm to 10 cm in size

330,000,000 objects from 1 mm to 1 cm in size

EFFECTS ON OZONE, EARTHQUAKES, AND THUNDERSTORMS

Ozone

In a 2020 paper titled “The environmental impact of emissions from space launches: A comprehensive review,” Jessica Dallas and her colleagues at the University of New South Wales wrote that “ozone depletion is one of the largest environmental concerns surrounding rocket launches from Earth.”
In 2021, there were 146 orbital rocket launches to put 1,800 satellites into space. At that rate, to maintain and continually replace 100,000 low-earth-orbit satellites, which have an average lifespan of five years, would require more than 1,600 rocket launches per year, or more than four every day, forever into the future.

2020 and 2021 witnessed two of the largest Antarctic ozone ‘holes’ since measurements began in 1979. The 2020 ‘hole’ was also the longest-lasting on record, and the 2021 ‘hole’ was only a few days shorter; larger than the continent of Antarctica, it began in late July 2021 and ended on December 28, 2021. Everyone is still blaming chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which were banned by the Montreal Protocol in 1978.
Nobody is looking at rocket launches, of which there were more in 2020 and 2021 than in any previous year. In addition to the 146 orbital launches in 2021, there were 143 sub-orbital launches of rockets to over 80 kilometers in altitude, for a total of 289 high-altitude launches for the year, or almost one every day.

Earthquakes and Thunderstorms
In 2012, Anatoly Guglielmi and Oleg Zotov reviewed evidence that the global use of electricity has an effect on both seismic activity and thunderstorms. In particular, global electric power consumption spikes every hour on the hour, and so does the average number of earthquakes in the world. In 2020, a group of Italian scientists supplied additional information: solar activity also correlates with earthquakes, and it appears to do so by raising the voltage of the ionosphere.
Since this must increase the current flow in the global electric circuit (see chapter 9 of my book, The Invisible Rainbow), it would increase the electric currents that flow through the earth’s crust at all times, which would increase the stress on earthquake faults and increase the frequency of earthquakes. The Italian paper’s title is “On the correlation between solar activity and large earthquakes worldwide.”

Whether 100,000 satellites, although emitting powerful radio waves, would raise the ionospheric voltage, is doubtful. However, the rocket exhaust from every launch emits tons of water vapor, which is more conductive than dry air. The stratosphere is dry and contains very little water, and any water humans put there remains there for years and accumulates.

Multiple daily rocket launches, in perpetuity, will fill the stratosphere with water vapor, increase its conductivity, and increase the current flowing in the global electric circuit. The current flowing through the earth’s crust will increase, possibly increasing the frequency of earthquakes.
I also speculate that this would increase the frequency and power of thunderstorms worldwide. Were it not for thunderstorms, the ionospheric voltage, which averages 300,000 volts, would discharge in about 15 minutes. About 100 lightning strokes per second, somewhere on Earth, continuously recharge it. Increasing the current flow in the global electric circuit would discharge the ionosphere more quickly, and since it is thunderstorms that recharge the Earth’s battery, the frequency and violence of thunderstorms would have to increase.

ALTERATION OF THE EARTH’S ELECTROMAGNETIC ENVIRONMENT

What everyone is completely blind to is the effect of all the radiation from satellites on the ionosphere, and consequently on the life force of every living thing. The relationship of electricity to qi and prana has escaped the notice of modern humans. Atmospheric physicists and Chinese physicians have yet to share their knowledge with one another. And at this time, such a sharing is crucial to the survival of life on Earth.
“The pure Yang forms the heaven, and the turbid Yin forms the earth. The Qi of the earth ascends and turns into clouds, while the Qi of the heaven descends and turns into rain.” So the Yellow Emperor’s Classic of Internal Medicine described the global electric circuit 2,400 years ago — the circuit that is generated by the ionosphere and that flows perpetually between the Yang (positive) heaven and the Yin (negative) earth.
The circuit that connects us to earth and sky and that flows through our meridians giving us life and health. A circuit that must not be polluted with frequencies emitted by a hundred thousand satellites, some of whose beams will have an effective power of up to ten million watts. That is sheer insanity, and so far no one is paying attention.
No one is even asking whether the satellites have anything to do with the profound and simultaneous decline, planetwide, in the number of insects and birds, and with the pandemic of sleep disorders and fatigue that so many are experiencing. Everyone is so focused on a virus, and on antennas on the ground, that no one is paying attention to the holocaust descending from space.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

Pfizer Admits Not Enough Study On Child Vax Effects

by

Published on January 10, 2022Written by libertyplanets.com

Pfizer has finally admitted that they needed to do more clinical trials, and what was conducted was too short to determine the long term effects of myocarditis risk in children, according to a report they submitted to the FDA.

Perhaps they could have made this admission known BEFORE “vaccines” were approved for use in children aged 5-11 years old.
Parents have already rushed out and had their children jabbed, which is confusing considering the large influx of negative information on the “vaccine.”
Maybe most parents just hate their kids and want them dead…
But I digress.
Anyways…
Perhaps the FDA should have also not issued emergency use authorization for the Pfizer “vaccine,” when only a month ago they had, at the same time, held back on issuing an EUA for the Moderna shot, which has had similar issues to Pfizer.
The admittance occurs on page 11 of their FDA advisory committee briefing, admitting the sample size of volunteers in their clinical trials was also too small to detect myocarditis in children under 12.
The briefing states:
“The number of participants in the current clinical development program is too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination,” Pfizer states in its Overall Risk-Benefit Conclusions.
“Long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccine in participants 5 to

Governments Admit Using ‘Mass Formation Psychosis’ For Population Control

by

Published on January 10, 2022Written by zerohedge.com

Dr. Robert Malone’s assertions about “mass formation psychosis” in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic are underscored by the fact that authorities in the UK admitted to using “totalitarian” methods of “mind control” to instill fear in the population.

In Canada, the military also admitted launching a psychological operations campaign against their own people in order to manipulate them into compliance with COVID-19 restrictions and mandates.
During his viral podcast with Joe Rogan after he was banned by Twitter, Malone explained how the global population was being manipulated into remaining in a constant state of hysterical anxiety via mass formation psychosis.
“What the heck happened to Germany in the 20s and 30s? Very intelligent, highly educated population, and they went barking mad. And how did that happen?” asked Malone.
“The answer is mass formation psychosis.”
“When you have a society that has become decoupled from each other and has free-floating anxiety in a sense that things don’t make sense, we can’t understand it, and then their attention gets focused by a leader or series of events on one small point just like hypnosis, they literally become hypnotized and can be led anywhere,” he added.
“And one of the aspects of that phenomenon is that the people that they identify as their leaders, the ones typically that come in and say you have this pain and I can solve it for you. I and I alone,” Malone further explained, “Then they will follow that person. It doesn’t matter whether they lied to them or whatever. The data is irrelevant.”
“We had all those conditions. If you remember back before 2019 everyone was complaining, the world doesn’t make sense and we are all isolated from each other.”
“Then this thing happened, and everyone focused on it,” stated Malone, noting,
“That is how mass formation psychosis happens and that is what has happened here.”
Malone’s summary of how health authorities seized on the unifying threat of the COVID-19 pandemic and exaggerated its thread to create mass hysteria is backed up by leaked details of how the UK government manipulated its population during the early days of the pandemic.
As first revealed by author and journalist Laura Dodsworth, scientists in the UK working as advisors for the government admitted using what they now admit to be “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods of instilling fear in the population in order to control behaviour during the pandemic.
The London Telegraph reported the comments made by Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B), a sub-committee of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) the government’s chief scientific advisory group.
The report quotes a briefing from March 2020, as the first lockdown was decreed, that stated the government should drastically increase “the perceived level of personal threat” that the virus poses because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened”.
One scientist with the SPI-B admits that “In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear.”
The unnamed scientist adds that “The way we have used fear is dystopian.”
The scientist further confessed that “The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable. It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.”
Another separate scientist on the subcommittee professed “You could call psychology ‘mind control’. That’s what we do… clearly we try and go about it in a positive way, but it has been used nefariously in the past.”
Another scientist warned that “We have to be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creeping in,” adding “people use the pandemic to grab power and drive through things that wouldn’t happen otherwise.”
According to the report, another researcher with the group acknowledged that “Without a vaccine, psychology is your main weapon,” adding that “Psychology has had a really good epidemic, actually.”
Yet another scientist on the subcommittee stated that they have been “stunned by the weaponisation of behavioural psychology” over the past year, and warned that “psychologists didn’t seem to notice when it stopped being altruistic and became manipulative.”
“They have too much power and it intoxicates them”, the scientist further warned.
In addition to the UK government’s response, it was also revealed that the Canadian military launched a psychological operations program against their own citizens in the early days of the pandemic order to amplify government messaging and “head off civil disobedience.”
“Canadian military leaders saw the pandemic as a unique opportunity to test out propaganda techniques on an unsuspecting public,” reported the Ottawa Citizen.
Meanwhile, following early efforts to bury the term altogether, Google is now desperately rigging its search results to return only negative articles about “mass formation psychosis” and Dr. Malone.
Google’s current top search result link for “mass formation psychosis” is a Forbes hit piece that recycles dubious claims Dr. Malone already debunked during his Rogan appearance.
See more here: zerohedge.com
Header image: Contagion Today
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

The winners and losers in FCC’s record-breaking 5G auction

by

Published on January 10, 2022Written by fortune.com

The Federal Communications Commission announced on Wednesday the complete list of winning bidders at its most recent auction of airwave licenses.

The segment of airwaves from 3.7 GHz to 4.2 GHz, known as the C-band, is useful for carrying new superfast 5G networks. The frequency is low enough to travel long distances but also offers enough bandwidth for super-speedy downloads.
Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile led a field of 21 winning bidders that spent a total of $81 billion on almost 6,000 individual licenses. It’s the most ever raised in a U.S. airwave auction. Winning bidders also have to pay about another $14 billion to help satellite companies that currently use the C-band to transition to other airwaves. Here’s a breakdown of who won and who lost:
Winner: T-Mobile
Out of the major carriers, T-Mobile came to the auction in the best position to build a 5G network. That’s because last year’s Sprint merger gave the carrier a bushel of licenses in the 2.5 GHz band, with quite similar characteristics to the C-band. Pressing its advantage, T-Mobile this week introduced new plans letting customers use more high-speed data. Since it didn’t need to buy as many C-band licenses, T-Mobile spent just $9 billion for 142 licenses in major cities where it had some holes.
Analyst Craig Moffett at MoffettNathanson Research calls T-Mobile the auction’s “true winner” since AT&T and Verizon had to spend so much more to win more licenses: “[T-Mobile emerges] from the auction with what is still the industry’s best spectrum position, but now with a balance sheet advantage as well. And [it faces] two competitors who are badly hobbled.”
Winner: U.S. taxpayers
Before the C-band auction started, analysts expected carriers would bid a total of $30 billion to $50 billion for the licenses, funds which go directly to the U.S. Treasury. Instead, as AT&T and Verizon fretted about their position in 5G, the total shot up to more than $80 billion.
The higher value implies that the Treasury may collect more from a few upcoming auctions of similar airwaves, too. The FCC is moving to auction spectrum in the 3.45 GHz band by the end of the year. Using the C-band bidding as a guide implies a value of $30 billion for the upcoming auction, analysts say.
Winner: Verizon
Verizon was literally the winner of the auction, as it spent the most—over $45 billion—and won more than half of all licenses for sale.
But Verizon was also a winner because it gained access to airwaves that it desperately needs to improve its 5G network. Until now, Verizon has split its 5G service in an unappealing way. On the one hand, a crowded airwave band provides nationwide 5G but doesn’t reliably provide fast downloads. A higher-frequency band service is superfast but doesn’t travel far and barely covers parts of 67 cities as of Feb. 25, 2021. The new C-band airwaves are a perfect middle ground for service that’s both widely available and speedy.
“After bidding aggressively, we believe Verizon will put to rest concerns about its spectrum position,” UBS analyst John Hodulik noted after the results came out.
Verizon also avoided giant acquisitions in recent years, meaning its balance sheet should be able to take on the new obligation without requiring slashing its spending to actually build its 5G network.
“Our mantra has been the winners are the carriers that get the most,” New Street Research analyst Jonathan Chaplin wrote after the results emerged. “Based on the C-band results, Verizon and AT&T are the big winners.”
Not everyone agrees. Longtime analyst Moffett at MoffettNathanson thinks Verizon and AT&T spent too much. “We think they emerge from the auction badly diminished,” he wrote. “Their balance sheets will force austerity, and an emphasis on cash flow over growth.”
Loser: AT&T
AT&T has had greater success rolling out 5G service nationwide than either Verizon or T-Mobile, with independent rating firms saying it is the fastest of the broadly available 5G networks. But AT&T has also struggled the most in deploying a truly superfast 5G network. In part that’s because the company’s balance sheet is weighed down with the huge costs of acquiring DirecTV and Time Warner over the past few years: almost $200 billion including debt.
Still, AT&T spent $23 billion at the auction to win over 1,600 licenses in the C-band. The licenses will bolster the carrier’s holdings for offering 5G service that is both widely available and super-speedy.
Analysts are worried about the financial implications, even as AT&T is moving to raise money by selling a majority stake in DirecTV. “If Verizon’s balance sheet problem is serious, AT&T’s is perhaps even more so, if only because their business mix is so much weaker,” analyst Moffett noted. AT&T can’t take advantage of the new licenses if it can’t afford to expand its network, he warns.
Loser: New wireless carriers
Cable giants Comcast and Charter Communications have been offering wireless service for a few years, mainly by leasing airwaves from Verizon. Some thought they would be big bidders at the C-band auction so they could build their own networks and not rely on a competitor. But the two didn’t win any C-band licenses. And Dish Network, which is building a brand-new 5G network with spectrum it already owns, barely won any new licenses.
That could be seen as a loss for all three. But analyst Walt Piecyk at LightShed Partners says the companies may have sat out the auction because they want to buy licenses in the upcoming 3.45 GHz auction. “This could be an interesting opportunity for Dish and the cable operators as AT&T and Verizon’s balance sheets might not be in the best position to compete so soon after the C-band auction,” he wrote.
See more here: fortune.com
Header image: Wikipedia
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

BoJo Rejects Energy Bill Tax Cuts To Help Struggling Families

by

Published on January 10, 2022Written by Climate Change Dispatch

Boris Johnson has indicated that he will NOT cut VAT on energy bills because it would help “a lot of people who perhaps don’t need the support” with rising living costs.

The Prime Minister on Tuesday night dismissed demands to enact the move to help struggling families, amid fears that residential energy bills could double to £2,000 in April when the price cap is set to rise.
His intervention sparked a backlash among Tory MPs, who have insisted that slashing VAT from energy bills should be a “Brexit dividend” now Britain has quit the European Union, which mandates the tax is levied at a minimum of five percent.
Speaking at a televised Downing Street press conference, Mr. Johnson was challenged about a vow he himself made in May 2016 to scrap VAT from energy bills if Britons voted Leave.
He denied having misled voters with his previous remarks but signaled that the Treasury would consider actions that were targeted only at the families most in need of support.
The Prime Minister said he was “not ruling out further measures” and acknowledged that the UK did now enjoy the “freedom to regulate our own VAT”, but set out his opposition to the proposal.
“The argument as you know is that it’s a bit of a blunt instrument and the difficulty is that you end up also cutting fuel bills for a lot of people who perhaps don’t need the support in quite the direct way that we need to give it. We need to help people who are in fuel poverty the most,” he said.
He said that the Government would listen to consumers and businesses, adding that Rishi Sunak, the Chancellor, was “very, very mindful of the increase in energy prices and the effect… on people up and down this country, and we are going to do all we can to help”.
His intervention came as the weather is about to get colder, with the first widespread frost of the winter expected this week, meaning families are likely to rely more heavily on central heating.
On Wednesday, Kwasi Kwarteng, the Business Secretary, will resume crisis talks with energy bosses about how to ease the pressure that soaring energy bills are also heaping on business, as a 25 percent spike in wholesale costs dampened hopes the market was stabilizing.
In April, energy bills are poised to rise 56 percent or more, following months of soaring wholesale costs that have been exacerbated by Russia restricting supply to the Continent.
The crisis has already caused a series of British energy suppliers to collapse and fuelled a growing cost of living squeeze.
‘VAT should be cut as a Brexit dividend’
Mr. Johnson’s comments came after 20 Tory MPs and peers wrote to The Telegraph last weekend demanding that he intervene to address the cost of living crisis.
Craig Mackinlay, the Tory MP who orchestrated the letter, declared on Tuesday night that VAT on energy bills was a “backdoor tax on the ‘just-about-managings’” and said he was “disappointed” that the Prime Minister seemed to be “robustly against” slashing it.
Mr. Mackinlay said: “VAT should be cut permanently as a Brexit dividend. Heating your home is as much of a right as buying children’s clothes. We don’t do it for fun. It’s a basic right and need.”
The MP, who chairs the Net Zero Scrutiny Group, also renewed calls for green levies to be suspended on energy bills, which analysts estimate could save households about £200 a year.
He warned that targeting support for poorer families through the welfare system would be “a disincentive to work, which is a very unconservative principle”.
Boris Johnson more ‘Heath than Thatcher’
Boris Johnson’s ‘big tax, big spend, big state’ government has been likened to that of Sir Edward Heath, the prime minister from 1970 to 1974
The news came as Liam Fox, a former Conservative Cabinet minister, accused Mr. Johnson of being more like Sir Edward Heath than Margaret Thatcher over tax and spending.
Writing for the ConservativeHome website, Dr. Fox said that he did not think that “all is well in the Boris Johnson premiership”.
He added: “For many Conservatives, including myself, the current government smacks too much of ‘big tax, big spend, big state’ – more reminiscent of Edward Heath than Margaret Thatcher.
See more here: climatechangedispatch.com
Header image: Reuters
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Related

Trackback from your site.

>
error: Content is protected !!