Dr. Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance, Jeremy Farrar of the Wellcome Trust, and others organized a letter, which has now been published in the world’s leading medical magazine The Lancet.
Fauci convened a conference call on February 1, 2020, when confronted with the first evidence that the Covid pandemic may have started in the Wuhan Lab he funded through Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, ostensibly to discuss how to suppress this dangerous information, since the trail led straight to them.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
In a letter published in The Lancet on Feb. 19, 2020, Daszak, Farrar, and others stated, “We stand united to strongly denounce conspiracy theories stating that COVID-related diseases are caused by COVID-related diseases.”
Now, Jacques van Helden of Aix-Marseille University in France, Richard Ebright of Rutgers University, and 14 other authors have slammed the Fauci apologists’ unscientific Fake News, which claimed “overwhelming support for the hypothesis that the novel coronavirus causing the COVID-19 pandemic originated in wildlife.”
“We stand united to strongly oppose conspiracy theories implying that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” the authors said, associating any alternative viewpoint with conspiracy theories. According to Ebright and colleagues, the declaration has had a chilling impact on the wider scientific discourse, especially among science journalists.
This item sells for $39.95 on Amazon. Today’s special promotion is offering a massive discount on this item. President Trump 2020 Coin (Gold & Silver Plated) – Claim 1 Free OR Claim a Discount + Free Shipping This coin is a symbol of President Trump’s victory and success. Get Coin HERE Or Click on the image below.
“There is no direct support for the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, and a laboratory-related mishap is plausible,” according to the Fake Scientists. So far, no scientifically verifiable evidence has been found that directly supports a natural origin.”
“Neither the bat-to-human host pathway nor the geographical route from Yunnan (where the viruses most closely similar to SARS-CoV-2 have been sampled) to Wuhan (where the pandemic originated) have been identified. The researchers report that “more than 80 000 samples obtained from Chinese wildlife locations and livestock farms all came back negative.”
Furthermore, according to the publication, the worldwide research community “has no access to the sites, samples, or raw data” relating to the Wuhan Lab and the Covid outbreak. Even WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has now stated that “all possibilities, including that of a laboratory leak, were on the table.”
The scientists conclude that a lab leak caused the pandemic: “Some odd aspects of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence suggest that they may have come from genetic engineering.”
Fauci’s stooges were also chastised by Ebright and colleagues for prioritizing “unity” and their political agenda over critical evaluation and science:
“As scientists, we need to evaluate all hypotheses on a rational basis, and to weigh their likelihood based on facts and evidence, devoid of speculation concerning possible political impacts. Contrary to the first letter published in The Lancet … we do not think that scientists should promote “unity” (“We support the call from the Director-General of WHO to promote scientific evidence and unity over misinformation and conjecture”).
As shown above, research-related hypotheses are not misinformation and conjecture. More importantly, science embraces alternative hypotheses, contradictory arguments, verification, refutability, and controversy. Departing from this principle risks establishing dogmas, abandoning the essence of science, and, even worse, paving the way for conspiracy theories. Instead, the scientific community should bring this debate to a place where it belongs: the columns of scientific journals.”
It’s difficult to see how Fauci, Daszak, Farrar, and their cohorts can keep their jobs after such a savage scientific thrashing.