Analysis, NEWS CURRENT EVENTS

Is Canada Becoming A Communist Country

I see a lot of discussion on Facebook about Canada and Trudeau and how he seems to be pushing ever more toward a communist-style leadership. And the question that often comes up is, “is Canada becoming a Communist country?”

Canada and Communism, from one reader’s view

I thought the point was made well, and so I will lob this out, pretty much as one of the people on Facebook said it recently. See what you think.

I really don’t want to have to keep talking about this but most people are totally sleepwalking through the most dangerous time in Canadian history. In case you haven’t figured it out yet, the people in the parties of our government are colluding to implement communism.

Here are just a few things that have happened recently that you probably have no idea about because the media is basically state propaganda and covers up for them:

-Bill C-10, the internet censorship bill was passed at 1:30am a couple days ago with the Bloc, NDP, Liberals and Green Party all colluding together to ram it through. (Still has to go through the senate)

-Bill C-36 is proposed which will see Canadians fined up to $70K and placed on house arrest for posting things online that the government deems hate speech. (Both of these bills are what China and North Korea do)

-The liberals are suing the House of Commons (unprecedented) to prevent documents from coming out about the firing of two scientists in the Winnipeg microbiology lab

-Our government is arresting the political opposition and the pastors of churches. (Another move that the Chinese Communist Party makes too)

-They are still pushing forward the gun ban and adding more to it behind the scenes

-In the beginning of the ‘pandemic’ Trudeau attempted to give himself unlimited power for 2 years to spend our money and raise taxes without having to run it by anyone. That was stopped but it hasn’t stopped him from giving away all our money which setting us up for a massive financial crisis that will destroy people’s lives in the near future, not to mention hyper-inflation.

These are just a few things as there is a lot more evidence that proves the people in our government do not care about the people they are supposed to serve. They are corrupt to the core and only care about enriching themselves and are doing everything they can to gain ultimate power and enslave us. It’s “in-your-face” obvious at this point.

Don’t let today’s ignorance become tomorrow’s nightmare. Start paying attention. Your future and your kids future has never been in more danger than right now.

P.S. this is the same government that raped, abused, tortured and murdered children in residential schools. They didn’t magically just get better.

If you want to see just how dysfunctional Trudeau has become in governing Canada, listen to this.

Michelle Remple Garner is a conservative member of federal parliament. She gives here a rundown on Trudeau’s antics of late and what this kind of behaviour means for the Canadian government if no one stands up to him.

Scripture commands us to pray for our leadership and all in authority. This man needs to be made aware of his responsibility to not destroy the very democracy that brought him to power.

In Jesus’ name. Amen.

Read More
Analysis, HEALTH WELLNESS

Did The World Health Organization Change The Definition Of Herd Immunity?

If you’ve read my posts here much before, you’ll know that I’ve documented elsewhere on this site their ties at the top with Communist ideology. And it is frightening where that could go. But I’ve seen many posts lately on some of my more favoured sites out there, asking the question, “did WHO change the definition of herd immunity,” and “did WHO change the definition of pandemic?”

Although I’m not a fan of the World Health Organization, I think this one isn’t as clear-cut as the conspiracy theorists believe it is.

First, the takeaway:

  • I think the World Health Organization is headed up by a communist sympathizer (which I’ve written about elsewhere).
  • I’m not surprised that “the powers that be” at the WHO are on the same track to get everyone in the world vaccinated as are Bill Gates, Fauci and all the newly-minted billionaires out of this crisis and the Covid vaccine as the only way out.
  • I don’t see that in this case, the WHO has done anything underhanded to “change the definition of herd immunity” in some clandestine way, hoping people won’t notice.
  • I think they are misguided at best and possibly somewhat malevolent in their approach to the best ways to deal with the covid issue (although I can’t prove this, though it sure seems like it).
  • As Christians we need to be very careful about saying “that is what they are doing” as opposed to what we maybe more often should be saying, such as “I believe that is what they are probably doing,” or, “I have to be open to the possibility that is what they are doing”
  • When we say “that’s it” as opposed to “that sure looks like it” we damage our credibility and our witness.
  • Real, careful thinking (the “cognitive man” approach) requires careful thought, the need to not jump to conclusions without knowing instead of suspecting and also, sometimes, having to say I don’t know.

Now, for “the rest of the story….”

Just because you’re paranoid, it doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you.

I see a lot of articles documenting (very well) the constantly changing landscape of recommendations from the WHO, the CDC, the AMA and various other governing bodies in different countries. Quite honestly, it seems there is a lot of story-changing and backtracking going on.

For instance, at the “The Liberty Daily” website, author J D Rucker writes about the shifting sands of recommendations from the WHO on whether or not children should be vaccinated.

Many of us, especially on “the right” see some rather sinister looking things happening with changing recommendations and silencing of competing views on the rightness or wrongness of pushing the vaccines as the only answer.

I think there are competing worldviews at work here in the different articles I read regarding this subject. For instance, from “my side” of the conspiratorial fence, I see a lot of mentions of a “change in definition of herd immunity” that supposedly happened on the World Health Organization website.

As an example, I’m going to take a “deep dive” into one article I came across over at Medium. It’s written by Tara, self-described as a “Resolute over-thinker, introvert, eternal optimist, recovering procrastinator, unashamed nerd.” (You can follow her at “All’s Write With The World.”)

Tara makes some interesting points. And I think her concerns that she raises resonate with me. I believe, as it seems she believes, that the Covid vaccines are now more dangerous than the virus. It seems that there is probably not much left anymore of the original Covid strain and all that are left are the many variants that have sprung up.

And I also believe that, as most of these things go, this would be better treated these days by an emphasis on vitamins C, D and zinc with the ability for doctors to freely prescribe ivermectin and hydroxichloroquine as needed. I’m not a doctor but I see many (and ever more recently) advocating for this choice in treating patients, yet often denied the right to do so by bureaucracies of all sorts.

But the specific question is, “did the WHO change their definition of herd immunity to push their agenda of global vaccination?”

Tara notes the following from the WHO website:

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the methods to obtain herd immunity used to be found on this web page. The page, titled Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19): Serology and dated 9 June, 2020, can be found on the Web Archive (Wayback Machine): https://web.archive.org/web/20201101161006/https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-serology

Now compare this with the explanation currently on the same page as of 13 November, 2020. (https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-serology)

And Tara asks, “What happened to that other part? You know, the part about herd immunity being developed through previous infection?” Furthermore, they state that “Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.”

Ok. I see the change. It is fair to question this.

Again, where’s the acknowledgement that herd immunity can be, and has been, established through previous infection? The WHO not only chooses to ignore one of the main methods of achieving herd immunity, it also asserts some deceitful claims, if not flat out lies. For example: “Vaccines train our immune systems to develop antibodies, just as might happen when we are exposed to a disease but — crucially — vaccines work without making us sick.”

She has several good points. The vaccines are apparently making A LOT of people sick. And according to some immunologists looking at the numbers, the risk of injury or death from the vaccine is now worse than the risks from getting covid.

Now here’s the jump….

In conclusion, the author asks, “Why would the WHO change the definition of herd immunity to completely ignore the other major half of it? Well, other than pushing the narrative that the experimental Covid-19 vaccine is the only way to save humankind from the Corona virus.”

I get the complaint. But here’s the problem. They didn’t actually “change” the definition of herd immunity.

As a matter of fact, I’m just going to copy a screenshot, right here, from the WHO website, right now, at June 24th, 2021. It is still there…..

Read it for yourself. “‘Herd Immunity,’ also known as ‘population immunity.’ is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infections.”

Their point, though (although I’m skeptical they have it right, for reasons that others note) is, “WHO supports achieving ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination, not by allowing a disease to spread through any segment of the population, as this would result in unnecessary cases and deaths.”

Questioning the wisdom of these vaccines is a fair thing to do, with all the injuries reported. But saying they are “changing the definition” to hit an agenda isn’t dealing fair with the facts.

They’re not changing the definition of herd immunity. They’re explaining why they think people are better off with the vaccine rather than the disease.

An ever-increasing number of immunologists think they are wrong. I get that, too, and from my limited perspective, I’d rather take my chances with Covid and zinc, D and ivermectin than I would ever want to have to take my chances with the vaccine.

But saying they are changing their definitions when they’re not is intellectually dishonest.

Look, I get the frustration. The American Institute for Economic Research posted an article expressing the frustrations we’ve all been dealing with on this issue.


Coronavirus lived on surfaces until it didn’t. Masks didn’t work until they did, then they did not. There is asymptomatic transmission, except there isn’t. Lockdowns work to control the virus except they do not. All these people are sick without symptoms until, whoops, PCR tests are wildly inaccurate because they were never intended to be diagnostic tools. Everyone is in danger of the virus except they aren’t. It spreads in schools except it doesn’t. 

On it goes. Daily. It’s no wonder that so many people have stopped believing anything that “public health authorities” say. In combination with governors and other autocrats doing their bidding, they set out to take away freedom and human rights and expected us to thank them for saving our lives. At some point this year (for me it was March 12) life began feeling like a dystopian novel of your choice. 

True. And so far, so good. But they, too, say this definition was removed from the WHO website, with conclusions as to why they did it….

But it wasn’t removed. And they even explain why they are making the change in emphasis – which is because, in the WHO’s mind, you’re better off with the vaccine than the disease.

So they’re not saying herd immunity doesn’t happen with people getting exposed to the disease, but only from the vaccine. They’ve not “changed the definition.” They’re only wanting people to see why they think the vaccine is wise.

And if we aren’t careful to see what is actually being said and instead jump on the memes that support our preconceptions, without proper homework, we just exchange one problem for another.

I fell for this, too. I saw this meme on facebook, and thought it sure fit the bill.

It is two different links, from two different pages, both still up there. And it’s an inaccurate meme to reinforce a presupposition that these people can’t be trusted.

But it’s based in disinformation. And the ends don’t justify the memes.

This particular attack on what they are doing doesn’t help our credibility in the end.

Can they be trusted? I’m not convinced. But does this way of glossing over the fact that these are two entries, still both on their website, on different pages, help us to get people to see it?

It only helps the preaching to the choir. But it isn’t going to do anything but destroy our credibility with the very people we still need to reach.

Pick your battles, do your homework, be humble and say “maybe” instead of jumping to conclusions all the time. We will all be better off for it.

Read More
HEALTH WELLNESS, NEWS CURRENT EVENTS, OpenLetters

My Body, My Choice and Covid Vaccines

An open letter to Brandon Harris regarding your letter to the editor of the Evansville Courier and Press.

Maybe it’s too much to expect the pro-choice, pro-vaccine crowd to see the irony in their stance.

Brandon:

You don’t know me. I’m sure we will never cross paths. But I am struck by the irony in your view of the irony from the other side of the street. You wrote a letter to the editor of the Evansville Courier and you said,

Watching the anti-vaccine protests at Indiana University, the prevalent sign is “My body my choice.” I just sit and wonder how many of those sign carriers are also anti-abortion and definitely don’t believe that expression.

– Brandon Harris

Evansville Courier and Press, June 17, 2021

I’m not picking on you, personally. Rather, I’m speaking to everyone you’ve represented by your letter to the editor – those of you who think a woman should be able to choose to terminate her pregnancy, but anti-vaxxers should not be able to choose to avoid the vaccine.

It’s called irony, Brandon. The pro-life, anti-vaxx side sees the irony in the stance people on your side take on these two issues. They’re jamming it back at you. And you don’t even see it.

The pro-life, anti-vax (PL-AV) side sees it glaring them in the face.

I can’t begin to tell you the number of times I’ve had people from my side of the discussion say to me, “so where are all the pro-choice people now with the ‘my body, my choice’ rhetoric when it comes to vaccines? Why can’t the see how ironic this is?”

I’ve had this discussion with pro-choice people who are anti-gun, anti-capital punishment, anti-seal hunting. Their response is always the same: “My body, my choice.”

It’s like hitting a wall of “non-think” when talking to people who think abortion is a valid choice for a woman with an unwanted pregnancy.

“So you think it’s wrong to hunt a baby seal. They’re so defenseless. But it’s ok to kill a baby in the womb?”

“Yes. Of course. It’s my body, my choice.”

Except it isn’t the woman’s body anymore. It might not be her fault the baby is in there (although, let’s face it, it sometimes is). But whether it’s her fault or not, It’s still her problem.

But it’s also a problem for the baby. It seems pretty intuitive that the baby probably wants to live.

A woman’s right to “choose” means she is making a choice for both herself and that unborn baby who will never see the light of day while alive.

“So you’re against capital punishment? That serial murderer or serial rapist has a right to live and society doesn’t have the right to take their life, huh?”

“That’s correct.”

“But a woman is killing a baby when she aborts it. She is taking an innocent human life.”

“Oh. But it’s her body, her choice.”

It’s hard to try to have a logical argument with people who don’t really want to determine what is right or wrong, but merely want to rearrange their prejudices so they don’t have to change their choices.

You’re missing the whole point, Brandon. I will bet against you a gazillion dollars that those people DO believe it is their body, their choice.

The difference is that when it comes to abortion, they don’t believe that is the woman’s body at all. They believe the woman’s body stops where the baby’s body starts. And her inconvenience, no matter how difficult, is no justification for killing an innocent life.

The irony. You just don’t see it.

We clash on worldview. The difference is our side sees your worldview and knows why we think it exists based on wrong premises.

Your side so often doesn’t even recognize this is a worldview, or what that means.

So let me explain it to you, Brandon, or at least try to explain it. Your worldview is your overall, sort of streamlined “alignment of the facts” approach to the world around you – your perceptions of why you are here, what the purpose of life is, if there is a heaven and hell after this life, and which one you’re probably going to end up in when you go.

Everybody has a worldview. Just not everybody has thought about why they believe what they believe about the world. In fact, some people avoid thinking about it because of what it might require them to do differently, were they ever to come to different conclusions about things.

So let me break this down for you, as I see it, from my side, and let’s see if I can help you (or others, on “your side” of this issue) understand the irony we feel as we, in desparation, try to throw your side’s slogan back at you in a desperate attempt to get your attention.

From my side, it looks this simple.

I think the vaccines are more harmful for people these days than the chance of contracting covid is. I’m not one of those who think Covid is “just a flu bug” or “was never really a thing.” That is a laughable position and people who hold that argument on “my side” are an embarrassment. They just are.

Can I just be honest here, Brandon, about what the difference is here between you and me?

Look. I’m not going to judge you. I don’t even know this is exactly how you feel. But it’s how I feel about how your side comes across.

Here goes. No offence intended. But I’m sure some will be offended. Yet, I have to say it anyway.

When you say regarding a pregnant woman, “my body, my choice,” it doesn’t cost you anything. When I say regarding being forced to get a covid vaccine, “my body, my choice,” that threatens YOU and YOUR health. That makes it personal to YOU.

If a woman wants to get an abortion, you’re not personally affected by that. But if I don’t want to get a vaccine, now you ARE potentially, anyway, personally affected by that. If she gets an abortion, you still get to live your life. If I don’t get the vaccine, and I spread Covid to you, YOU might not get to live the same as before.

Seems to me, plain and simple, that is the real issue. A woman’s right to choose abortion doesn’t negatively affect you. My choosing to not vaccinate might affect you personally. That is really the only thing that is different here.

At least, that is the way I see it. Convince me I’m wrong.

Look. Brandon, whether you can see it or not, my side thinks these vaccines are endangering ALL OF US. We are protesting it because even if your side drank the kool-aid, our side wants the chance to not have to drink it alongside you.

But if we could, we would like to get you to see the kool-aid for what it is, so you don’t drink it either.

We want you to have the right to choose, too. But we wish there wasn’t such an orchestrated effort on the part of mainstream media and big tech to squelch all the voices on the minority side of this issue. There are real doctors out there – real research scientists and immunologists – who think this stuff is going to harm a lot of people.

People on my side want you to be able to choose, too. But without half the information hidden from you. We are fighting for your rights and your health, whether or not you understand it.

Brandon, I’d just love to ask you a question here, in conclusion: if you thought that my not getting vaccinated wouldn’t be a threat to your health, would you really care if I got it or not?

If you knew it would only increase my chances of getting Covid but not yours, would you be at all concerned whether or not I got the vaccine?

Sorry buddy. Hate to have to say it. But it seems to me the other side is more consistent than yours. They’re concerned about their body, their choice; they’re concerned about your body and your choice. But (seemingly, anyway) unlike you, the other side is concerned about that baby’s body, and that baby’s choice. And you aren’t.

In one case that woman’s choice to abort doesn’t affect you. In the other case, that woman’s choice to not get vaccinated just might affect you. And if I can say so, it seems to me that that difference is really the only difference that concerns you.

It isn’t about my choice. It’s about whether my choices affect you. And we disagree on which choices affect who.

And if you can’t see the difference and the frustration that causes my side to try in desperation to use your side’s slogans against you, then we are going to have to keep trying to fight this battle for us and for you, too, in spite of your best efforts to stop it. Because this isn’t just about me. It’s about you too, whether you see it or not.

Read More
Analysis, NEWS CURRENT EVENTS

Is Trudeau Selling Canada Out To One World Government?

A year ago I would have said this was beyond unbelievable. But now, I really have to wonder.

Prime Minister Trudeau is either loved or hated in Canada, depending on your political predisposition. He seems to be applauded by many for his progressive views on the government taking care of everyone and his desire to accommodate the whims of many special interest groups.

He is greatly disliked by others for similar reasons. And those who don’t like him also often distrust him for what appears to be a lust for power.

And troubling to many, he seems to be fond of communist dictatorships.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqnmfNiaM-Y

Now, I saw a Facebook post recently that I found troubling, partly because it sounded creepy and partly because of friends that were writing to me on Messenger to get my thoughts about it – friends that I find to be rather “low-key” on these types of things, tending to not jump too quickly to conclusions.

Read it for yourself. I wasn’t sure what to do with it by itself. But when I put it together with some other things, it leaves me really wondering what he is up to.

Here is a letter as published in a Facebook post. You be the judge.

This needs to go VIRAL!!!!! Only each person can decide if this is real or not. It matches exactly what we have all read and researched will happen IF we don’t stop this. This is ALREADY happening in other countries…This is a leaker from the liberal party of canada. Please contact all levels of authorities and gov that we know the plan. The isolation centers we already know are bring built as shown on the gov website RFP program.

Fw: LPC Strategic Committee Leak

Inbox

LPC leaker <LPC_leaker@protonmail.com>

1:47 PM (7 hours ago)

‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Saturday, October 10, 2020 1:38 PM, REMOVED <REMOVED> wrote:

Dear REMOVED,

I want to provide you some very important information. I’m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning committee (which is steered by the PMO).

I need to start off by saying that I’m not happy doing this but I have to. As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children but for other children as well. The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals. They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes.

 The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows:

– Phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward. Expected by November 2020.

– Rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory. Expected by December 2020.

– Daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing, including increases in COVID related deaths following the same growth curves. Expected by end of November 2020.

– Complete and total secondary lock down (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions). Expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021

– Reform and expansion of the unemployment program to be transitioned into the universal basic income program. Expected by Q1 2021.

– Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection. Expected by February 2021.

– Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity. Expected Q1 – Q2 2021.

– Enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city). Expected Q2 2021.

– Transitioning of individuals into the universal basic income program. Expected mid Q2 2021.

– Projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability. Expected late Q2 2021.

– Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area. Expected by Q3 2021.

 Along with that provided road map the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet a unprecedented economic endeavor. One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians. What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale, that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada’s HealthPass) .

Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details”. Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely. And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities they would be given two options, participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized.

So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not. That it wont just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it.

All I know is that I don’t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future.

Now, if this letter existed in isolation, it might not bother me so much. But there are other things that link with it to give you chills.

Take this exchange with a member of the Ontario parliament with a speaker of the house, asking about internment camps and the Canadian government’s looking for contractors with interest in building them:

It’s very interesting that this above video used to be available on youtube. Now it’s been removed. You have to go to a “right-wing” site like Rumble or Bitchute to find it anymore. Wonder why?

It seems they’re not hiding the idea that they want to be able to detain people at will. The question has to be, “why?”

One has to wonder if part of this is jockeying for standing with Biden in case Trump loses the soon-coming election. (He won’t lose. But they seem to think he will, it seems.)

But there is a worldwide push from some elite to want to do a “global financial reset.” I’m not sure yet what that means.

But right now, it is scary to think about what it means.

Read More
Thoughts

What Is The Goal With The Perpetual Cycle Of Fear With Covid

You might want to watch this video. This doctor discusses what she believes the agenda is behind the perpetual cycle of fear and vaccination with the Covid “Crisis.”

I’m not sure she hits every point correctly. But she raises some interesting points.

What are the connections between the vaccines, population control and population containment?

Take a listen

Read More
HEALTH WELLNESS, SCIENCE AND TECH

How To Protect Yourself From Vaccinated People (And From The Vaccine)

Dr Bryan Ardis On How to Counteract the COVID Spike Protein and How To Protect Yourself From Vaccine Shedding

Please Note:

This post has become pretty popular, and for good reason. But I have to say it's a bit "outdated," because it was written primarily for those "prepping" because they knew they needed to get the vaccine.

If you've already gotten the shot, this post is still informative purposes.

But you'll want to go HERE to read about the best way to supplement if you've already had the shot and you're concerned about the best way to remove the spike proteins from your system.

How to detox from spike proteins.

Dr Bryan Ardis, CEO of Ardis Labs, discusses in this MAGA Institute podcast how, with natural vitamin and mineral supplements, we can protect ourselves from both SARS-CoV-2 itself and any spike proteins that may be transmitted by shedding from people who have taken the COVID-19 gene therapy injections.

This has never been about treating Covid. It's always been about the vaccine. Just look at how they've downplayed ivermectin and you'll see what I mean.

If you're here, it's probably because you see the value in natural approaches to health care.  If so, you might want to read this article on something called "chlorine dioxide" and "chlorine dioxide therapy."

Perhaps you've heard of "shedding."

So first of all, what is "shedding?"

According to Dr. Palevsky, in a video featured on "America's Frontline Doctors," there are some concerns regarding "viral shedding" and particularly more with this mRNA vaccine. In part, he says,

And so, what we’ve been seeing is a massive increase in those who’ve been given the injection of blood clotting problems, miscarriages, stillborns, infertility, stroke, heart attack, autoimmune diseases, and death, just to name a few, and that’s in those who been injected.  So certainly there should be a suspicion when you see people around the injected people who have not been injected getting the typical symptoms of COVID in addition to miscarriages, bleeding, irregular menstrual cycles; it should raise a very, very strong suspicion.

As featured in "Americas's Frontline Doctors"

Now, in all fairness, the typical response from the medical community is that "viral shedding" is impossible. But as many of us know, they seem to be lying to us about many things, such as the effectiveness of ivermectin, HCQ and the like, as well as underreporting the adverse reactions to the vaccine.

So you're going to have to decide who you are going to trust on this issue.

My experience to date, however, is that the "Florence NIghtengales" of the medical community keep raising red flags and expressing their reasons for concern with extreme detail and clarity; but the establishment seems to keep saying, "just shut up and ignore them."

The Florence Nightengales are always in the minority - at least in the beginning.

If you have to get the vaccine, this is how to protect yourself from its damaging effects, according to Dr. Ardis.

Dr. Ardis also discusses that we need to be kind, loving and understanding as we attempt to rescue people from the COVID-19 "cult."

You can visit Dr. Ardis' website here.

You can also download a report here from the MAGA Institute.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm into natural supplements. THIS ONE is high on my list.

THE RECIPE, according to Dr Bryan Ardis - vitamin C, magnesium and selenium

The report in the link above contains a whole bunch of documentation for these ingredients and how they are effective in dealing with the adverse effects of the virus and the vaccine.

But, in short, Dr Ardis recommends the following:

  • Selenium - supports the liver's ability to produce glutathione. You need 200 mcg (micrograms) per day.
  • Vitamin C - very specific dosing required. Work up to 10,000 mG of vitamin C per day. 5000 in the morning and 5000 in the evening. It is water soluble. Tests have proven that vitamin C can even protect animals in labs from contaminants like lead sulphate and radiation poisoning.
  • If you need to get the vaccine, take vitamin C 4 hours before you go. You need 500 mG per KG of body weight. (See my notes, below...)
  • You need magnesium - magnesium chloride, magnesium citrate or magnesium glycinate. 500 mG per day and work your way up to 1000 mG per day.
  • Magnesium stops calcium from saturating the cells and prevents disease.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go to flccc.net and americasfrontlinedoctors.org for information on how to protect yourself from potentially deadly results from being around people who have been injected with the Covid vaccines.

By the way, I've also written an article about pine needle tea and how it can apparently help protect you from "Covid shedding."

NOTE on the Vitamin C quantity

I did some calculating about the amount of vitamin C that Dr. Ardis recommends to take within 1 to 4 hours before you go for the vaccine. For a 200 pound man, that would be 45,000 mG of vitamin C!!!!!

That does sound really crazy to me. I will be honest. For instance, Dr. Axe, a doctor of chiropractic, certified doctor of natural medicine and clinical nutritionist suggests that taking more than 2,000 mG of vitamin C per day is overload.

However... As Dr. Axe himself says,

There’s some evidence that 200 milligrams per day is the maximum amount of vitamin C that human cells can absorb. However, according to the Linus Pauling Institute, “There is no reliable scientific evidence that doses of vitamin C up to 10 g/day (10,000 milligrams) in adults are toxic or detrimental to health.”

Dr. Axe regarding Vitamin C levels and toxicity

So, Does This Really Work?

I am not a doctor, nor am I a medical professional of any kind. And I want to be VERY careful here to state that I am NOT giving medical advice; I am merely passing along advice from certified medical professionals.

But, at the same time, I do want to share some anecdotal evidence and give you my personal feeling regarding what I myself would do if I find myself in a situation where I would need to be "V'd" with one of these things.

The Anectodal evidence

My wife and I were out at dinner in the summer. Our waitress felt the way we do about this vaccine. But she needed to get it for work - they were threatening that she would lose her job if not jabbed.

Her experience with the first one was typical - sore arm at the injection site, aches, mild fever and the like. She was fearful of the second shot as they tell you that the second one is the one that really kicks your butt.

So I told her about this article (I'm adding this part 4 months later) about 3 days before she went for the second shot. She started that night with the protocol - 10,000 per day vitamin C, the selenium and the magnesium chloride up until the vaccine. And she continued it for a few days after the vaccine. From what she told me, though, I don't believe she did the extra "kick" of that vitamin C overdose just before the shot.

Even without that quantum dose of C before the shot, it seems she did exceedingly well.

The first day after the vaccine, I asked her how she made out and she said,

"Thank you so much for the information the other night. I took all the vitamins starting that night and 24 hours after vaccine #2 I feel great! My arm isn't even sore this time!

I followed up with her two weeks later (which is how I know she continued it for a week after the shot) to see how she did. In part, what she said was,

"I'm doing amazing!!! I had NO side effects from the second shot. My arm didn't even hurt. I was able to pick up a shift at work the day after I got my shot. I can never thank you enough for the information you gave me from Dr. Ardis. I really believe that was the reason I did so well. I even shared the regimen with some friends and they did great as well!

What I plan to do if I ever have to get the poke

Anecdotal evidence is a funny thing, and we tend to put a lot of emphasis on it - more than the evidence of others, as it turns out.

Quite honestly, if I am ever in a situation where I have to get the thing stuck in me, I think I might bump it up a bit a couple hours before I am scheduled to get it - perhaps I will go with an extra 5,000 mG in addition to the 10,000 prep for the few days before and the week after.

Because, in all honesty, I think my reaction is much like many of my readers have commented: 90,000 mG sounds like a LOT of vitamin C - even for a lab rat.

But that's me. And I am neither a doctor nor the son of a doctor.

(But I am the father of a DARN GOOD nutrition counselor... though I'm probably biased.)

Anyway, you'll have to do some research regarding this quantum vitamin C dose and use your judgement and the advice of a professional.

Good luck. God speed. Avoid the jab. But if you can't, this formula is recommended by a doctor and it seems from the feedback I'm getting to be hitting the target!

CLICK HERE TO READ ABOUT CHLORINE DIOXIDE THERAPY

Enter your text here...

Read More
Covid-19

This Has Never Been About Treating Covid. It’s Always Been About The Vaccine

If you think the vaccine is about saving your life, I’m going to challenge that thought. There have been treatments known for many months now that are far more effective than the vaccine. This has never been about treating Covid. This has always been about the vaccine.

Don’t believe me?

Have you heard of Dr Kory?

This guy is in the top of his game. He is a board-certified internal medicine and lung specialist.

Listen to what he has to say about Ivermectin and how well it treats Covid.

And they still haven’t listened to these guys. This is about getting this shot into everyone’s arm.

He also makes a valuable point. This disease is hitting the black and the latino populations the hardest. Isn’t that what the globalists want to do?

Just a thought.

Read More