NEWS CURRENT EVENTS, Thoughts

Why Pastor Artur Pawlowski Was Arrested In The Middle Of A Calgary Highway

After having heard his testimony, I am infuriated to discover why Pastor Artur Pawlowski was arrested on a Calgary Highway. It’s despicable and cowardly on behalf of the Alberta law enforcement and they need to held accountable for this draconian overreach.

Now, if you’ve read my site for any time now, you know I’m rather strongly “anti-mask” and anti-lockdown.

If you know who I’m referring to, you can hear his side of the story in the video at the bottom of the post. But if you don’t know who he is, enjoy the first video and then when you see the second one, and wonder why pastor Artur was arrested in the middle of a Calgary highway, you can hear him describe the situation in his own words.

This man has been treated worse by the Calgary police than many people are treated in prison in some communist countries.

You probably know the guy I’m referring to, even if you don’t know his name. He’s the guy who has become somewhat of a Canadian Hero for demanding the police leave his church. If you haven’t seen this, please watch. It explains why he is a hero to many and also why he may be the target of the police.

https://youtu.be/XyzH6sLHLZw

Anyone following the news on Pastor Pawlowski knows that he has been getting his share of harassment from the Calgary Police department.

But THIS??? Arrested in THE MIDDLE OF A HIGHWAY?

Supposedly, the arrest was for “contempt of court.”

The real problem for the authorities is they KNOW they have no rights to do anything to stop this guy. And this is the burr under their saddle.

You see, Canada has been handing out fines right and left for these gatherings, for people refusing to quarantine when returning to Canada from abroad, for not limiting the sizes of social gatherings and all kinds of other stuff.

And this guy is really getting to them.

But WHY the arrest in the MIDDLE OF THE HIGHWAY?

Well, this is the most infuriating part. You can hear his testimony in his own words in the video below. But the quick answer is this.

One Sunday, pastor Pawlowski left his church doors open. The police came by, but have never been successful in issuing him tickets, or getting him to comply, or to get him to shut up.

So they come by on a Sunday, DROP A CITATION OFF ON THE PORCH that says he is supposed to appear in court. And then later, when he didn’t “comply” with this court order that HE NEVER ACTUALLY RECEIVED, they arrested him for “contempt of court.”

When the police are on the right side of the law, they don’t have to set up false pretenses to arrest people. This is so blatantly obvious it makes me want to scream.

Hear him, in his own words.,

If you’re Canadian, you need to write, call, protest, support the protestors and those who are opposing these unlawful lockdowns.

Not only was he arrested, he was left to lie on a concrete floor for 24 hours and denied access to his legal representation.

These people are underhanded and need to be reeled in.

This has to stop.

Read More
Covid-19, HEALTH WELLNESS, SCIENCE AND TECH

MIT Researchers Infiltrate Anti-Maskers And Are Stunned To Discover They Do SCIENCE

You can’t make this stuff up. You really can’t. Someone sent me a link from an article at “Life Site News” that left me not knowing whether to laugh, cry or both.

MIT researchers infiltrate ‘anti-maskers,’ but find they ‘practice a form of data literacy in spades’

‘Far from ignoring scientific evidence to argue for individual freedom,’ the researchers conceded, ‘anti-maskers often engage deeply with public datasets.’ The scientists went on to smear data-savvy people who question harsh lockdowns or the orders of public health officials, comparing them to January 6 Capitol rioters and warning about too much ‘critical thinking’ undermining trust in government institutions.

A group of scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has released a research paper examining the scientific justification behind groups which challenge the purportedly scientific basis of restrictions introduced on the back of COVID-19, admitting that such groups “value unmediated access to information and privilege personal research and direct reading over ‘expert’ interpretations.”

The paper, published in January and titled “How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online,” aimed to show how “activist networks of anti-mask users [a term used to describe lockdown protestors generally] leverage the rhetoric of scientific rigor in order to oppose public health measures like mask mandates or indoor dining bans.”

So as the story goes, a team of five – four academics from MIT and a mathematician from Wellesley College joined some Facebook and Twitter groups and “observed” them and their interactions.

Ok….

The group reportedly analyzed “close to half a million tweets that use data visualizations to talk about the pandemic,” as well as “over 41,000 images” of graphs and charts used by “anti-mask groups” to demonstrate the myriad statistics from COVID-related studies.

According to the study, the researchers acknowledged “a high level of scientific competency and literacy among critics of non-medical interventions against the Wuhan coronavirus.”

They also seemed a little annoyed by that. Listen to this curious quote from the article.

“Calling for increased media literacy can often backfire: the instruction to ‘question more’ can lead to a weaponization of critical thinking and increased distrust of media and government institutions.”

The authors of the report criticize the skeptics for capitalizing “on the skeptical impulse that the ‘science simply isn’t settled.’

The problem for these people is this causes people to ‘think for themselves,’ and this, apparently, has been leading to disastrous ends – which, I assume, are the ends that people don’t believe the narrative that contradicts the science?

Listen to these tidbits out of the report…

  • Their study “finds that anti-mask groups practice a form of data literacy in spades.”
  • “[w]ithin this constituency, unorthodox viewpoints do not result from a deficiency of data literacy” but that, in fact, “sophisticated practices of data literacy are a means of consolidating and promulgating views that fly in the face of scientific orthodoxy.

In addition, the study found that “anti-mask groups on Twitter often create polished counter-visualizations that would not be out of place in scientific papers, health department reports, and publications like the Financial Times.”

Counter-visualizations is a term used to describe graphical representations of COVID-related statistics which refute or otherwise challenge the data used by public health officials to justify civil restrictions.

In essence, the research team admitted that skeptical groups have relied on robust datasets in order to challenge the opposing assertions of medical elites, like the radically pro-mask Dr. Anthony Fauci.

The researchers ultimately commended skeptics as acknowledging “the subjectivity of how datasets are constructed” and their subsequent effort “to reconcile the data with lived experience,” thus ruling out F

“Far from ignoring scientific evidence to argue for individual freedom,” the researchers conceded, “anti-maskers often engage deeply with public datasets.”

“[T]hese groups seek to make the process of understanding data as transparent as possible in order to challenge the powers that be.”

AND THAT IS THE PROBLEM FOR THEM.

The study found that both pro-lockdown and anti-lockdown groups utilize public health data to bolster their claims for and against public health mandates, though drawing different conclusions. The researchers noted that lockdown skeptics in particular “are critical about the data sources used to make visualizations in data-driven stories.” This leads more skeptical groups to “engage in lengthy conversation about the limitations of imperfect data,” according to the study.

“These anti-mask activists therefore conclude that unreliable statistics cannot be the basis of policies that actively harm people by isolating them and leaving businesses to collapse en masse,” the authors wrote. Furthermore, “anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naive realism about the ‘objective’ truth of public health data.”

MIT researchers fret about ‘weaponization of critical thinking’ making more people distrust media, government institutions

Now, this next part would be funnier if it didn’t have such “disastrous implications.

From the article in LifeSite News:

The team compared lockdown skeptics to rioters at the U.S. Capitol building on January 6, an event that they said has “similarly illustrated that well-calibrated, well-funded systems of coordinated disinformation can be particularly dangerous when they are designed to appeal to skeptical people.” The researchers unqualifiedly claim that “the coup relied on a collective effort fanned by people questioning, interacting, and sharing these ideas with other people,” placing any person or group questioning of common assumptions into the category of criminal instigators.

The problem here is that their circular reasoning has turned into a logical circular firing squad. And they just don’t see it.

These people seem to be starting with the assumption that masks are good, and in spite of the data presented to them from the very people they are researching, they conclude the anti-maskers are still dangerous…. because, well, because…. science?

“Anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naive realism about the ‘objective’ truth of public health data.”

Catch this gem: “calling for increased media literacy can often backfire: the instruction to ‘question more’ can lead to a weaponization of critical thinking and increased distrust of media and government institutions.”

According to the authors, skeptical groups have capitalized “on the skeptical impulse that the ‘science simply isn’t settled,’ prompting people to simply ‘think for themselves,’” a danger that they say has already led “to horrifying ends.”

The study characterized the skepticism of mainstream media-touted COVID data as “an act of resistance against the stifling influence of central government, big business, and liberal academia.” Such groups, they said, are “highly reflexive about the inherently biased nature of any analysis, and resent what they view as the arrogant self-righteousness of scientific elites.”

EXACTLY.

“Most fundamentally, the groups we studied believe that science is a process, and not an institution.”

The fact is, most scientists believe that, too.

Accordingly, “[c]onvincing anti-maskers to support public health measures in the age of COVID-19 will require more than ‘better’ visualizations, data literacy campaigns, or increased public access to data,” the researchers concluded.

“For these anti-mask users, their approach to the pandemic is grounded in more scientific rigor, not less.”

So maybe they’ll have to resort to brute force? Seems like their game plan to me.

Read More